曾经犯过错误吗?航空式错误管理在医疗保健中的作用

Niall Downey
{"title":"曾经犯过错误吗?航空式错误管理在医疗保健中的作用","authors":"Niall Downey","doi":"10.1102/2051-7726.2019.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human error is inevitable in all walks of life. It generally has little effect, unless you work in a safety-critical industry. Aviation and healthcare are two such industries although they have very different approaches to managing error. They also have very different outcomes regarding mortality/morbidity related to error. This paper discusses how aviation achieves these results and how they could be transferred to healthcare. Aviation has a three-stage approach to managing error. First, we have a “Just Culture” which means we can own up to genuine mistakes without fear of disciplinary action or sanctions as long as we cooperate with investigating how the error occurred. It is not a “No-Blame” culture; we are still expected to take responsibility for our actions. Second, we investigate each event to find why the error occurred. We usually identify a “tripwire” which led to the individual making the error. We assess whether we can re-engineer the system to remove the tripwire and, if possible, add a safety net to reduce the chance of recurrence. Third, we train staff in error management as part of both initial training and recurrent training. Aviation globally is now focussing on introducing evidence-based training to better meet the needs of the crew and make most effective use of expensive training time. These principles are relevant and transferable to healthcare and could potentially be equally successful there. Success, however, relies on a change in culture by both staff and patients. Error needs to be accepted as inevitable in healthcare, as it is in aviation, and that the outcome is determined by how it is managed. We need to focus on “what went wrong” as opposed to “who went wrong” and accept that attributing blame and demanding retribution is not a sustainable approach.","PeriodicalId":202461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ever made a mistake? The role of aviation-style error management in healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Niall Downey\",\"doi\":\"10.1102/2051-7726.2019.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human error is inevitable in all walks of life. It generally has little effect, unless you work in a safety-critical industry. Aviation and healthcare are two such industries although they have very different approaches to managing error. They also have very different outcomes regarding mortality/morbidity related to error. This paper discusses how aviation achieves these results and how they could be transferred to healthcare. Aviation has a three-stage approach to managing error. First, we have a “Just Culture” which means we can own up to genuine mistakes without fear of disciplinary action or sanctions as long as we cooperate with investigating how the error occurred. It is not a “No-Blame” culture; we are still expected to take responsibility for our actions. Second, we investigate each event to find why the error occurred. We usually identify a “tripwire” which led to the individual making the error. We assess whether we can re-engineer the system to remove the tripwire and, if possible, add a safety net to reduce the chance of recurrence. Third, we train staff in error management as part of both initial training and recurrent training. Aviation globally is now focussing on introducing evidence-based training to better meet the needs of the crew and make most effective use of expensive training time. These principles are relevant and transferable to healthcare and could potentially be equally successful there. Success, however, relies on a change in culture by both staff and patients. Error needs to be accepted as inevitable in healthcare, as it is in aviation, and that the outcome is determined by how it is managed. We need to focus on “what went wrong” as opposed to “who went wrong” and accept that attributing blame and demanding retribution is not a sustainable approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2019.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2019.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人的错误在各行各业都是不可避免的。它通常没有什么效果,除非你在一个安全关键的行业工作。航空和医疗保健就是两个这样的行业,尽管它们管理错误的方法非常不同。他们在与错误相关的死亡率/发病率方面也有非常不同的结果。本文讨论了航空如何取得这些成果以及如何将其转移到医疗保健领域。航空管理错误的方法分为三个阶段。首先,我们有一个“公正的文化”,这意味着我们可以承认真正的错误,而不必担心纪律处分或制裁,只要我们配合调查错误是如何发生的。这不是一种“不责备”的文化;我们仍然要为自己的行为负责。其次,我们调查每个事件,找出错误发生的原因。我们通常会识别出导致个人犯错的“绊线”。我们会评估是否可以重新设计系统,移除“绊线”,并在可能的情况下增加安全网,以减少再次发生的机会。第三,我们对员工进行错误管理培训,作为初始培训和经常性培训的一部分。全球航空业目前正专注于引入循证培训,以更好地满足机组人员的需求,并最有效地利用昂贵的培训时间。这些原则与医疗保健相关且可转移,可能在医疗保健领域取得同样的成功。然而,成功依赖于工作人员和患者文化的改变。我们需要承认,在医疗保健领域,错误是不可避免的,就像在航空业一样,错误的结果取决于管理方式。我们需要关注“是什么出了问题”,而不是“谁出了问题”,并承认归咎责任和要求报复不是一种可持续的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ever made a mistake? The role of aviation-style error management in healthcare
Human error is inevitable in all walks of life. It generally has little effect, unless you work in a safety-critical industry. Aviation and healthcare are two such industries although they have very different approaches to managing error. They also have very different outcomes regarding mortality/morbidity related to error. This paper discusses how aviation achieves these results and how they could be transferred to healthcare. Aviation has a three-stage approach to managing error. First, we have a “Just Culture” which means we can own up to genuine mistakes without fear of disciplinary action or sanctions as long as we cooperate with investigating how the error occurred. It is not a “No-Blame” culture; we are still expected to take responsibility for our actions. Second, we investigate each event to find why the error occurred. We usually identify a “tripwire” which led to the individual making the error. We assess whether we can re-engineer the system to remove the tripwire and, if possible, add a safety net to reduce the chance of recurrence. Third, we train staff in error management as part of both initial training and recurrent training. Aviation globally is now focussing on introducing evidence-based training to better meet the needs of the crew and make most effective use of expensive training time. These principles are relevant and transferable to healthcare and could potentially be equally successful there. Success, however, relies on a change in culture by both staff and patients. Error needs to be accepted as inevitable in healthcare, as it is in aviation, and that the outcome is determined by how it is managed. We need to focus on “what went wrong” as opposed to “who went wrong” and accept that attributing blame and demanding retribution is not a sustainable approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for assessing and improving quality of surgical performance: the current status and future Simulation training: a novel and effective way to improve knowledge and attitudes towards coroner’s court attendance Conflicting intra-departmental views on the importance of simulation in general surgery Occult metastatic axillary carcinoma masked underlying primary accessory breast carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1