从《档案学评论》看北美档案与档案管理的研究趋势

Heejin Park
{"title":"从《档案学评论》看北美档案与档案管理的研究趋势","authors":"Heejin Park","doi":"10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<ABSTRACT> The study aims to analyze the articles published in Archivaria to identify various trends and to explore the future research agenda in the area of records and archive management. The data used in this study include 75 articles published in Archivaria during the recent five years. In quantitative measurement, the study presents the current status of subject areas by year and author. In content analysis, the articles are categorized into the subject areas related to records and archive management, research topics, as well as the foci and research methodologies used. The results showed the differences between North American and Korean research trends in the area of records and archive management.","PeriodicalId":344902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management","volume":"254 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Research Trends of Records and Archive Management in North America through the Review of Archivaria\",\"authors\":\"Heejin Park\",\"doi\":\"10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<ABSTRACT> The study aims to analyze the articles published in Archivaria to identify various trends and to explore the future research agenda in the area of records and archive management. The data used in this study include 75 articles published in Archivaria during the recent five years. In quantitative measurement, the study presents the current status of subject areas by year and author. In content analysis, the articles are categorized into the subject areas related to records and archive management, research topics, as well as the foci and research methodologies used. The results showed the differences between North American and Korean research trends in the area of records and archive management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management\",\"volume\":\"254 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在分析《档案学》期刊上发表的文章,以确定档案与档案管理领域的各种趋势,并探讨未来的研究议程。本研究使用的数据包括近五年在Archivaria发表的75篇文章。在定量测量方面,本研究按年份和作者划分了各学科领域的现状。在内容分析方面,文章分为与档案管理相关的学科领域、研究课题、研究重点和研究方法。结果显示,北美和韩国在记录和档案管理领域的研究趋势存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study on the Research Trends of Records and Archive Management in North America through the Review of Archivaria
The study aims to analyze the articles published in Archivaria to identify various trends and to explore the future research agenda in the area of records and archive management. The data used in this study include 75 articles published in Archivaria during the recent five years. In quantitative measurement, the study presents the current status of subject areas by year and author. In content analysis, the articles are categorized into the subject areas related to records and archive management, research topics, as well as the foci and research methodologies used. The results showed the differences between North American and Korean research trends in the area of records and archive management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Ontology Modeling by Analyzing RiC-CM v0.2 차세대 전자기록관리 프로세스 재설계 연구 A Study on Managing Dataset Records in Government Information Systems A Study on the Development of Educational Programs Using the Presidential Archives for the Improvement of the Self-Esteem of Children from Multi-Cultural Families A Study on the Necessity of a Series of Charges in Information Disclosure for Work Improvement: Comparing the Cases of the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1