新的定性方法部分

Colin Elman, D. Collier, Henry E. Brady
{"title":"新的定性方法部分","authors":"Colin Elman, D. Collier, Henry E. Brady","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2905408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fall of 2002, over 1,000 members of the American Political Science Association—including 28 former Association Presidents and seven former APSR editors—signed a petition to launch a new APSA Organized Section for Qualitative Methods. The proposed section would sponsor training and research focused on the several branches of methodology associated with the qualitative tradition. The goal will be to promote an integrated understanding of these methods and their relationship to other branches of methodology, including the quantitative tradition. The new section would complement the activities of the existing Political Methodology Section, seeking to develop productive avenues of cooperation.","PeriodicalId":275625,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Quasi-Experiment (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Qualitative Methods Section\",\"authors\":\"Colin Elman, D. Collier, Henry E. Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2905408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the fall of 2002, over 1,000 members of the American Political Science Association—including 28 former Association Presidents and seven former APSR editors—signed a petition to launch a new APSA Organized Section for Qualitative Methods. The proposed section would sponsor training and research focused on the several branches of methodology associated with the qualitative tradition. The goal will be to promote an integrated understanding of these methods and their relationship to other branches of methodology, including the quantitative tradition. The new section would complement the activities of the existing Political Methodology Section, seeking to develop productive avenues of cooperation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Quasi-Experiment (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Quasi-Experiment (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2905408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Quasi-Experiment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2905408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2002年秋天,超过1000名美国政治科学协会的成员——包括28名前协会主席和7名前APSR编辑——签署了一份请愿书,要求成立一个新的APSA定性方法组织部门。拟议的章节将赞助培训和研究,重点是与定性传统有关的几个方法论分支。目标将是促进对这些方法及其与方法论其他分支,包括定量传统的关系的综合理解。新的科将补充现有的政治方法科的活动,力求发展富有成效的合作途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Qualitative Methods Section
In the fall of 2002, over 1,000 members of the American Political Science Association—including 28 former Association Presidents and seven former APSR editors—signed a petition to launch a new APSA Organized Section for Qualitative Methods. The proposed section would sponsor training and research focused on the several branches of methodology associated with the qualitative tradition. The goal will be to promote an integrated understanding of these methods and their relationship to other branches of methodology, including the quantitative tradition. The new section would complement the activities of the existing Political Methodology Section, seeking to develop productive avenues of cooperation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mobility Restrictions and Risk-Related Agency Conflicts Identification Using Border Approaches and IVs Non-Linear Incentives, Worker Productivity, and Firm Profits: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment Covariate Distribution Balance via Propensity Scores Time Distance and Mutual Fund Holding Horizon: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment Setting of High-Speed Railway Opening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1