制度逻辑与银行业转型:从传统逻辑到金融科技

Alana Bauer Lacerda, Felipe Robaski, Fernando Dias Lopes
{"title":"制度逻辑与银行业转型:从传统逻辑到金融科技","authors":"Alana Bauer Lacerda, Felipe Robaski, Fernando Dias Lopes","doi":"10.33965/ama2020_202003l010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banking institutions are faced with profound changes coming from the development of technology and the consequent entry of a new player in the field: fintech companies, startups focused on financial services, with strong adherence to the digitally native public, as well as those underserved by traditional banks. From the approach of institutional logic, and the combination of document analysis and in-depth interviews, we contribute with the knowledge of how banks are being able to combine the previously dominant traditional logic and fintech logic into a hybrid model. The analysis shows how traditional banks absorb fintech practices and how the introduction of fintechs in the field promotes changes not only in the banking sector, but also in other spheres. The interaction of the logics that shape this change emphasizes a unidirectional dynamic, in which only the logic of fintechs influencing the traditional banking logic was observed.","PeriodicalId":263215,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC AND THE TRANSFORMATION IN THE BANKING SECTOR: FROM TRADITIONAL LOGIC TO FINTECH\",\"authors\":\"Alana Bauer Lacerda, Felipe Robaski, Fernando Dias Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/ama2020_202003l010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Banking institutions are faced with profound changes coming from the development of technology and the consequent entry of a new player in the field: fintech companies, startups focused on financial services, with strong adherence to the digitally native public, as well as those underserved by traditional banks. From the approach of institutional logic, and the combination of document analysis and in-depth interviews, we contribute with the knowledge of how banks are being able to combine the previously dominant traditional logic and fintech logic into a hybrid model. The analysis shows how traditional banks absorb fintech practices and how the introduction of fintechs in the field promotes changes not only in the banking sector, but also in other spheres. The interaction of the logics that shape this change emphasizes a unidirectional dynamic, in which only the logic of fintechs influencing the traditional banking logic was observed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/ama2020_202003l010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/ama2020_202003l010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

银行机构正面临着技术发展带来的深刻变化,随之而来的是该领域新参与者的进入:金融科技公司、专注于金融服务的初创公司,以及那些传统银行服务不足的人。从制度逻辑的方法,以及文献分析和深度访谈的结合,我们贡献了银行如何能够将以前占主导地位的传统逻辑和金融科技逻辑结合为混合模型的知识。分析显示了传统银行如何吸收金融科技实践,以及金融科技在该领域的引入如何促进不仅在银行业,而且在其他领域的变化。形成这种变化的逻辑之间的相互作用强调了一种单向动态,在这种动态中,只有金融科技的逻辑影响了传统的银行逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC AND THE TRANSFORMATION IN THE BANKING SECTOR: FROM TRADITIONAL LOGIC TO FINTECH
Banking institutions are faced with profound changes coming from the development of technology and the consequent entry of a new player in the field: fintech companies, startups focused on financial services, with strong adherence to the digitally native public, as well as those underserved by traditional banks. From the approach of institutional logic, and the combination of document analysis and in-depth interviews, we contribute with the knowledge of how banks are being able to combine the previously dominant traditional logic and fintech logic into a hybrid model. The analysis shows how traditional banks absorb fintech practices and how the introduction of fintechs in the field promotes changes not only in the banking sector, but also in other spheres. The interaction of the logics that shape this change emphasizes a unidirectional dynamic, in which only the logic of fintechs influencing the traditional banking logic was observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND INNOVATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY IN BRAZILIAN COMPANIES ARE CRYPTOCURRENCIES UNBIASED? THE CASE OF BITCOIN IN BRAZIL INNOVATION PRACTICES THROUGH KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS: PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION IN THE BRAZILIAN NAVY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES: ANALYSIS OF CONTEXT AND THE IMPLICATION IN THE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS THE INFLUENCE OF A POSTGRADUATE COURSE IN UNDERTAKING AS A CAREER OPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1