希望泉?和平、进步与多元主义

M. Beeson
{"title":"希望泉?和平、进步与多元主义","authors":"M. Beeson","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529209389.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the influence of liberal and constructivist international theories. Despite liberalism’s normative appeal and the pacifying affect of economic interdependence, it looks increasingly unsustainable. Likewise, while constructivists usefully highlight the possible importance of ideas, it is not clear that ‘good’ ideas about environmental security will necessarily prevail.","PeriodicalId":255067,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Anarchy?","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hope Springs? Peace, Progress and Pluralism\",\"authors\":\"M. Beeson\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/policypress/9781529209389.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter looks at the influence of liberal and constructivist international theories. Despite liberalism’s normative appeal and the pacifying affect of economic interdependence, it looks increasingly unsustainable. Likewise, while constructivists usefully highlight the possible importance of ideas, it is not clear that ‘good’ ideas about environmental security will necessarily prevail.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Anarchy?\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Anarchy?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529209389.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Anarchy?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529209389.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章着眼于自由主义和建构主义国际理论的影响。尽管自由主义具有规范的吸引力和经济相互依赖的安抚作用,但它看起来越来越难以为继。同样,虽然建构主义者有用地强调了思想的可能重要性,但并不清楚关于环境安全的“好”思想是否一定会占上风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hope Springs? Peace, Progress and Pluralism
This chapter looks at the influence of liberal and constructivist international theories. Despite liberalism’s normative appeal and the pacifying affect of economic interdependence, it looks increasingly unsustainable. Likewise, while constructivists usefully highlight the possible importance of ideas, it is not clear that ‘good’ ideas about environmental security will necessarily prevail.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental Security Hope Springs? Peace, Progress and Pluralism Getting Real: The Way the World Works? Unequal Security The Psychological and Cultural Dimensions of Security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1