{"title":"Latviešu mācībvalodas un mazākumtautību izglītības iestāžu vidusskolēnu latviešu valodas kompetence: salīdzinošais pētījums","authors":"Zenta Anspoka","doi":"10.37384/lva.2021.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topicality of the research is related to the State policy of education to strengthen the role of the Latvian language as a national language by enabling the integration of society and intercultural dialogue. The aim of the study is to analyse the level of language competence of Grade 12 students of Latvian language of instruction in comparison with minority schools. The results of the empirical research are obtained from 468 texts written by students with the Latvian language of instruction and minority secondary education institutions in different regions of Latvia. The texts used are systematised in the balanced corpus of modern Latvian language. The research was conducted within the framework of the National Research Programme “Latvian Language” (No VPP-IZM-2018/2-0002). An analysis of essays’ content, sentences, contextual binding of their sets, language style, orthography, and punctuation has been carried out. Data from the study shows no significant difference between the skills of Latvian language of instruction and minority secondary education institutions’ students to form text according to the topic. Approximately 57% of respondents follow the proportions among different parts of the text, the binding of sentences to create the text as a whole, the principle of completion of the text; 29% of respondents use language features exactly according to language style. The most common language errors in the self-created texts of students from both types of schools are punctuation errors, the spelling of short and long vowels and consonants in words, words written together and separately, and the spelling of foreign names. Students from minority secondary schools make simpler sentence syntactic structures and by 9% fewer punctuation errors. Still, they have 32% more errors in spelling words and the use of words in sentences. In the didactic of the Latvian language, we have to think more about learning of language based on discourse, in which the text has a social context at first, only then a linguistic form. We have to develop a sense of language for students, improve a methodology for learning linguistics terminology, cooperation between teachers of all subjects, and the attitude of each teacher to their own language and speech in the learning and teaching process.","PeriodicalId":231190,"journal":{"name":"Latviešu valodas apguve. XIII Starptautiskais baltistu kongress : rakstu krājums","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latviešu valodas apguve. XIII Starptautiskais baltistu kongress : rakstu krājums","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37384/lva.2021.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的主题性与国家教育政策有关,即通过促进社会一体化和文化间对话来加强拉脱维亚语作为国家语言的作用。本研究的目的是分析拉脱维亚语教学的12年级学生的语言能力水平与少数民族学校的比较。实证研究的结果来自拉脱维亚不同地区以拉脱维亚语为教学语言的学生和少数民族中等教育机构编写的468篇文本。使用的文本在平衡的现代拉脱维亚语语料库中系统化。这项研究是在“拉脱维亚语”国家研究计划(编号VPP-IZM-2018/2-0002)的框架内进行的。文章的内容,句子,上下文绑定的集合,语言风格,正字法和标点符号的分析进行了。研究数据显示,拉脱维亚语教学技能与少数民族中等教育机构学生根据主题形成文本的技能没有显著差异。约57%的被调查者遵循语篇各部分的比例、句子的结合构成语篇的整体、完成语篇的原则;29%的受访者完全按照语言风格使用语言特征。两类学校学生自编文本中最常见的语言错误是标点符号错误、单词中长短元音和辅音的拼写错误、单词拼在一起和分开写的错误以及外国名字的拼写错误。少数民族中学学生的句子句法结构更简单,标点错误减少了9%。尽管如此,他们在拼写单词和在句子中使用单词方面的错误还是高出32%。在拉脱维亚语的教学中,我们必须更多地考虑基于话语的语言学习,其中文本首先具有社会背景,然后才具有语言形式。我们必须培养学生的语感,改进学习语言学术语的方法,各学科教师之间的合作,以及每个教师在学习和教学过程中对自己的语言和言语的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Latviešu mācībvalodas un mazākumtautību izglītības iestāžu vidusskolēnu latviešu valodas kompetence: salīdzinošais pētījums
The topicality of the research is related to the State policy of education to strengthen the role of the Latvian language as a national language by enabling the integration of society and intercultural dialogue. The aim of the study is to analyse the level of language competence of Grade 12 students of Latvian language of instruction in comparison with minority schools. The results of the empirical research are obtained from 468 texts written by students with the Latvian language of instruction and minority secondary education institutions in different regions of Latvia. The texts used are systematised in the balanced corpus of modern Latvian language. The research was conducted within the framework of the National Research Programme “Latvian Language” (No VPP-IZM-2018/2-0002). An analysis of essays’ content, sentences, contextual binding of their sets, language style, orthography, and punctuation has been carried out. Data from the study shows no significant difference between the skills of Latvian language of instruction and minority secondary education institutions’ students to form text according to the topic. Approximately 57% of respondents follow the proportions among different parts of the text, the binding of sentences to create the text as a whole, the principle of completion of the text; 29% of respondents use language features exactly according to language style. The most common language errors in the self-created texts of students from both types of schools are punctuation errors, the spelling of short and long vowels and consonants in words, words written together and separately, and the spelling of foreign names. Students from minority secondary schools make simpler sentence syntactic structures and by 9% fewer punctuation errors. Still, they have 32% more errors in spelling words and the use of words in sentences. In the didactic of the Latvian language, we have to think more about learning of language based on discourse, in which the text has a social context at first, only then a linguistic form. We have to develop a sense of language for students, improve a methodology for learning linguistics terminology, cooperation between teachers of all subjects, and the attitude of each teacher to their own language and speech in the learning and teaching process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Latviešu mācībvalodas izglītības iestādes izvēle saviem bērniem: kādi ir krievu valodā runājošo ģimeņu iemesli? Skolēnu pārspriedumu korpusa izveide Latviešu valodas apguvēju korpuss lietojumā: teorētisks un metodoloģisks ieskats Dzimtās un otrās latviešu valodas prasme pirmsskolas vecumā: vārdu krājums A note on native and non-native accentedness judgements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1