{"title":"工人权利的执行","authors":"","doi":"10.13169/instemplrighj.3.1.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principal focus of our proposals in the Manifesto for Labour Law is to deliver decent standards at work via collective bargaining. An important role nonetheless remains for the law in setting minimum standards on wages, working time, equality, health and safety, dismissal and so on. A large body of evidence indicates that the system at present is failing to deliver the rights it ostensibly guarantees. Although fees for bringing employment tribunal (ET) claims have, for the moment, been abolished in the wake of the UNISON judgment of the Supreme Court,54 much more needs to be done to ensure that legal standards are not mere statements of legal theory but are realised in practice for all workers – and that employers who abuse workers’ rights do not gain an advantage over those who respect them.","PeriodicalId":247208,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Employment Rights Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enforcement of workers' rights\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/instemplrighj.3.1.0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principal focus of our proposals in the Manifesto for Labour Law is to deliver decent standards at work via collective bargaining. An important role nonetheless remains for the law in setting minimum standards on wages, working time, equality, health and safety, dismissal and so on. A large body of evidence indicates that the system at present is failing to deliver the rights it ostensibly guarantees. Although fees for bringing employment tribunal (ET) claims have, for the moment, been abolished in the wake of the UNISON judgment of the Supreme Court,54 much more needs to be done to ensure that legal standards are not mere statements of legal theory but are realised in practice for all workers – and that employers who abuse workers’ rights do not gain an advantage over those who respect them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institute of Employment Rights Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institute of Employment Rights Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/instemplrighj.3.1.0107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Employment Rights Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/instemplrighj.3.1.0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在《劳动法宣言》中提出的建议的主要重点是通过集体谈判在工作中提供体面的标准。尽管如此,法律在确定工资、工作时间、平等、健康和安全、解雇等方面的最低标准方面仍然发挥着重要作用。大量证据表明,目前的司法体系未能实现其表面上所保障的权利。尽管在最高法院的UNISON判决之后,提交就业法庭(ET)索赔的费用目前已被取消,54但要确保法律标准不仅仅是法律理论的陈述,而是在所有工人的实践中实现,还要做更多的工作,而且那些滥用工人权利的雇主不会比那些尊重工人权利的雇主获得优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enforcement of workers' rights
The principal focus of our proposals in the Manifesto for Labour Law is to deliver decent standards at work via collective bargaining. An important role nonetheless remains for the law in setting minimum standards on wages, working time, equality, health and safety, dismissal and so on. A large body of evidence indicates that the system at present is failing to deliver the rights it ostensibly guarantees. Although fees for bringing employment tribunal (ET) claims have, for the moment, been abolished in the wake of the UNISON judgment of the Supreme Court,54 much more needs to be done to ensure that legal standards are not mere statements of legal theory but are realised in practice for all workers – and that employers who abuse workers’ rights do not gain an advantage over those who respect them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
8 good reasons why adult social care needs sectoral collective bargaining Enterprise democracy and worker voice The employment relationship International health and safety standards after Brexit Brexit and workers' rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1