科技活动的成果:法律保护的可能性

A. Serebriakov
{"title":"科技活动的成果:法律保护的可能性","authors":"A. Serebriakov","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal regulation of science in Russia today is imperfect. This is especially noticeable in the example of the legal regimes of the results of scientific and technological activities. Neither domestic legislation nor scientific doctrine offers a detailed classification of such results. At the same time, the solution of the issue of effective protection of the rights of scientists to the results of their intellectual activity depends on this. The purpose of this work is to highlight and analyze the existing types of results of scientific and research activities from the point of view of the prospects for their legal protection. To achieve this goal, different methods were used. The comparative analysis made it possible to show the differences between different types of results of scientific and scientific and technical activities. The formal legal method made it possible to assess the state of Russian legislation in terms of regulating relations regarding the creation of the results of scientific and technical activities. As well as a comparative legal method, the application of which made it possible to evaluate international and foreign experience in regulating issues related to the legal regimes of scientific research results. The author proposes several classifications of the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities, using such criteria as the form of expression and content of such a result (results that are intellectual property and results that cannot be granted the intellectual property regime), as well as the sequence of creating the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities (primary and secondary results). The question is raised about the expediency of fixing provisions in domestic law that reflect the content of the concept of open science. In addition, proposals were formulated to improve Russian legislation in terms of introducing measures to increase the effectiveness of protecting the rights of subjects of scientific and scientific and technical activities to the results of research and development.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Results of Scientific and Technological Activities: Possibility of Legal Protection\",\"authors\":\"A. Serebriakov\",\"doi\":\"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The legal regulation of science in Russia today is imperfect. This is especially noticeable in the example of the legal regimes of the results of scientific and technological activities. Neither domestic legislation nor scientific doctrine offers a detailed classification of such results. At the same time, the solution of the issue of effective protection of the rights of scientists to the results of their intellectual activity depends on this. The purpose of this work is to highlight and analyze the existing types of results of scientific and research activities from the point of view of the prospects for their legal protection. To achieve this goal, different methods were used. The comparative analysis made it possible to show the differences between different types of results of scientific and scientific and technical activities. The formal legal method made it possible to assess the state of Russian legislation in terms of regulating relations regarding the creation of the results of scientific and technical activities. As well as a comparative legal method, the application of which made it possible to evaluate international and foreign experience in regulating issues related to the legal regimes of scientific research results. The author proposes several classifications of the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities, using such criteria as the form of expression and content of such a result (results that are intellectual property and results that cannot be granted the intellectual property regime), as well as the sequence of creating the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities (primary and secondary results). The question is raised about the expediency of fixing provisions in domestic law that reflect the content of the concept of open science. In addition, proposals were formulated to improve Russian legislation in terms of introducing measures to increase the effectiveness of protecting the rights of subjects of scientific and scientific and technical activities to the results of research and development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前俄罗斯对科学的法律规制并不完善。这一点在关于科学和技术活动成果的法律制度的例子中尤其明显。国内立法和科学理论都没有对这些结果进行详细的分类。同时,有效保护科学家对其智力活动成果的权利这一问题的解决也有赖于此。这项工作的目的是从法律保护前景的角度,突出和分析现有的科研活动成果类型。为了实现这一目标,使用了不同的方法。比较分析可以显示不同类型的科学和科学技术活动的结果之间的差异。通过正式的法律方法,可以评估俄罗斯在规范与创造科学和技术活动成果有关的关系方面的立法状况。以及一种比较法律方法,这种方法的应用使人们能够评价国际和外国在管理与科学研究成果的法律制度有关的问题方面的经验。作者对科学和科技活动的成果提出了几种分类,使用的标准包括成果的表达形式和内容(属于知识产权的成果和不能授予知识产权制度的成果),以及创造科学和科技活动成果的顺序(主要成果和次要成果)。提出了在国内法中修改反映开放科学概念内容的规定的权宜之计问题。此外,还拟订了建议,以改进俄罗斯立法,采取措施,提高保护科学和科学技术活动主体对研究和发展成果的权利的效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Results of Scientific and Technological Activities: Possibility of Legal Protection
The legal regulation of science in Russia today is imperfect. This is especially noticeable in the example of the legal regimes of the results of scientific and technological activities. Neither domestic legislation nor scientific doctrine offers a detailed classification of such results. At the same time, the solution of the issue of effective protection of the rights of scientists to the results of their intellectual activity depends on this. The purpose of this work is to highlight and analyze the existing types of results of scientific and research activities from the point of view of the prospects for their legal protection. To achieve this goal, different methods were used. The comparative analysis made it possible to show the differences between different types of results of scientific and scientific and technical activities. The formal legal method made it possible to assess the state of Russian legislation in terms of regulating relations regarding the creation of the results of scientific and technical activities. As well as a comparative legal method, the application of which made it possible to evaluate international and foreign experience in regulating issues related to the legal regimes of scientific research results. The author proposes several classifications of the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities, using such criteria as the form of expression and content of such a result (results that are intellectual property and results that cannot be granted the intellectual property regime), as well as the sequence of creating the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities (primary and secondary results). The question is raised about the expediency of fixing provisions in domestic law that reflect the content of the concept of open science. In addition, proposals were formulated to improve Russian legislation in terms of introducing measures to increase the effectiveness of protecting the rights of subjects of scientific and scientific and technical activities to the results of research and development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1