E. Perfecto, Kang-Wook Lee, H. Hamel, T. Wassick, C. Cline, M. Oonk, C. Feger, D. Mcherron
{"title":"聚酰亚胺-Cu MCM-D的Cu盖帽选择评价","authors":"E. Perfecto, Kang-Wook Lee, H. Hamel, T. Wassick, C. Cline, M. Oonk, C. Feger, D. Mcherron","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2001.927977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the 3 types of polyimide (PI) systems, pre-imidized, polyamic ester and polyamic acid, the latter has been shown to react with Cu surfaces when it is spun coated. This paper reviews Cu-polyimide adhesion and diffusion data and present various wet process alternatives to minimize Cu diffusion into poly(biphenyl dianhydride-p-phenylene diamine) (BPDA-PDA) polyamic acid precursor. Two different process options were investigated: a precoat or adhesion promoters (A1100, AP420 and benzotriazole) prior to the polyamic acid apply, and an additive (Tetrazole or BTA) formulated in the PAA solution. The 5 processes were compared with respect to adhesion, capacitance, dielectric constant and reliability. Only the BTA formulation had adhesion problems which were attributed to the A1100 precoat used. A1100 as a precoat was further evaluated on various copper surfaces and curing environments. All proposed solutions performed well when used on a MCM-D/C module which was used to extract electrical parametrics and was further subjected to reliability testing.","PeriodicalId":340217,"journal":{"name":"2001 Proceedings. 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.01CH37220)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Cu capping alternatives for polyimide-Cu MCM-D\",\"authors\":\"E. Perfecto, Kang-Wook Lee, H. Hamel, T. Wassick, C. Cline, M. Oonk, C. Feger, D. Mcherron\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.2001.927977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the 3 types of polyimide (PI) systems, pre-imidized, polyamic ester and polyamic acid, the latter has been shown to react with Cu surfaces when it is spun coated. This paper reviews Cu-polyimide adhesion and diffusion data and present various wet process alternatives to minimize Cu diffusion into poly(biphenyl dianhydride-p-phenylene diamine) (BPDA-PDA) polyamic acid precursor. Two different process options were investigated: a precoat or adhesion promoters (A1100, AP420 and benzotriazole) prior to the polyamic acid apply, and an additive (Tetrazole or BTA) formulated in the PAA solution. The 5 processes were compared with respect to adhesion, capacitance, dielectric constant and reliability. Only the BTA formulation had adhesion problems which were attributed to the A1100 precoat used. A1100 as a precoat was further evaluated on various copper surfaces and curing environments. All proposed solutions performed well when used on a MCM-D/C module which was used to extract electrical parametrics and was further subjected to reliability testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2001 Proceedings. 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.01CH37220)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2001 Proceedings. 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.01CH37220)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2001.927977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 Proceedings. 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.01CH37220)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2001.927977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Cu capping alternatives for polyimide-Cu MCM-D
Among the 3 types of polyimide (PI) systems, pre-imidized, polyamic ester and polyamic acid, the latter has been shown to react with Cu surfaces when it is spun coated. This paper reviews Cu-polyimide adhesion and diffusion data and present various wet process alternatives to minimize Cu diffusion into poly(biphenyl dianhydride-p-phenylene diamine) (BPDA-PDA) polyamic acid precursor. Two different process options were investigated: a precoat or adhesion promoters (A1100, AP420 and benzotriazole) prior to the polyamic acid apply, and an additive (Tetrazole or BTA) formulated in the PAA solution. The 5 processes were compared with respect to adhesion, capacitance, dielectric constant and reliability. Only the BTA formulation had adhesion problems which were attributed to the A1100 precoat used. A1100 as a precoat was further evaluated on various copper surfaces and curing environments. All proposed solutions performed well when used on a MCM-D/C module which was used to extract electrical parametrics and was further subjected to reliability testing.