目的基于BP神经网络的汽车驾驶舒适性评价

Shuai Zhang, Guidong Yang, Yafei Wang, Qinghui Ji, Huimin Zhang
{"title":"目的基于BP神经网络的汽车驾驶舒适性评价","authors":"Shuai Zhang, Guidong Yang, Yafei Wang, Qinghui Ji, Huimin Zhang","doi":"10.1109/CVCI51460.2020.9338661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driving comfort, which is mainly influenced by vibration and shock, is an essential factor to evaluate the performance of intelligent vehicles. The evaluation methods of driving comfort mainly contain subjective and objective evaluation. Subjective evaluation is time-consuming, expensive and sensitive to personal feelings. And objective evaluation is difficult to exactly define the relationship between objective parameters and driving comfort. In order to combine the advantages of subjective and objective evaluation, a neural network that adopt objective indicators as input and subjective ratings as output was established for evaluating driving comfort. First, a road test with about 9000 km was conducted and key parameters of vehicle status were recorded, as well as subjective ratings. Secondly, 25,165 segments were extracted from the naturalistic driving data. Then, total weighted root-mean-square accelerations of all segments were computed according to ISO 2631–1997 Standard. And the result shows that the comfort levels calculated by weighted root-mean-square accelerations cannot match the subjective ratings given by professional evaluators very well. Finally, a 20-128-256-256-128-6 BP neural network was established and trained. And the accuracy of evaluation based on neural network is better than evaluation based on weighted root-mean-square value. The result reveals that it is feasible to establish a neural network model based on collected naturalistic driving data to evaluate the driving comfort of vehicles.","PeriodicalId":119721,"journal":{"name":"2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective Evaluation for the Driving Comfort of Vehicles Based on BP Neural Network\",\"authors\":\"Shuai Zhang, Guidong Yang, Yafei Wang, Qinghui Ji, Huimin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CVCI51460.2020.9338661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Driving comfort, which is mainly influenced by vibration and shock, is an essential factor to evaluate the performance of intelligent vehicles. The evaluation methods of driving comfort mainly contain subjective and objective evaluation. Subjective evaluation is time-consuming, expensive and sensitive to personal feelings. And objective evaluation is difficult to exactly define the relationship between objective parameters and driving comfort. In order to combine the advantages of subjective and objective evaluation, a neural network that adopt objective indicators as input and subjective ratings as output was established for evaluating driving comfort. First, a road test with about 9000 km was conducted and key parameters of vehicle status were recorded, as well as subjective ratings. Secondly, 25,165 segments were extracted from the naturalistic driving data. Then, total weighted root-mean-square accelerations of all segments were computed according to ISO 2631–1997 Standard. And the result shows that the comfort levels calculated by weighted root-mean-square accelerations cannot match the subjective ratings given by professional evaluators very well. Finally, a 20-128-256-256-128-6 BP neural network was established and trained. And the accuracy of evaluation based on neural network is better than evaluation based on weighted root-mean-square value. The result reveals that it is feasible to establish a neural network model based on collected naturalistic driving data to evaluate the driving comfort of vehicles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVCI51460.2020.9338661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVCI51460.2020.9338661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驾驶舒适性是评价智能汽车性能的重要因素,主要受振动和冲击的影响。驾驶舒适性的评价方法主要包括主观评价和客观评价。主观评价耗时、昂贵且对个人感情敏感。客观评价难以准确界定客观参数与驾驶舒适性之间的关系。为了结合主观评价和客观评价的优点,建立了以客观指标为输入,主观评分为输出的神经网络对驾驶舒适性进行评价。首先,进行了约9000公里的道路测试,记录了车辆状态的关键参数,并进行了主观评分。其次,从自然驾驶数据中提取25,165段;然后,根据ISO 2631-1997标准计算所有路段的加权均方根加速度总和。结果表明,加权均方根加速度计算的舒适性水平不能很好地与专业评估人员给出的主观评分相匹配。最后,建立并训练了一个20-128-256-256-128-6 BP神经网络。基于神经网络的评价精度优于基于加权均方根值的评价。结果表明,基于采集到的自然驾驶数据,建立神经网络模型来评价车辆的驾驶舒适性是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Objective Evaluation for the Driving Comfort of Vehicles Based on BP Neural Network
Driving comfort, which is mainly influenced by vibration and shock, is an essential factor to evaluate the performance of intelligent vehicles. The evaluation methods of driving comfort mainly contain subjective and objective evaluation. Subjective evaluation is time-consuming, expensive and sensitive to personal feelings. And objective evaluation is difficult to exactly define the relationship between objective parameters and driving comfort. In order to combine the advantages of subjective and objective evaluation, a neural network that adopt objective indicators as input and subjective ratings as output was established for evaluating driving comfort. First, a road test with about 9000 km was conducted and key parameters of vehicle status were recorded, as well as subjective ratings. Secondly, 25,165 segments were extracted from the naturalistic driving data. Then, total weighted root-mean-square accelerations of all segments were computed according to ISO 2631–1997 Standard. And the result shows that the comfort levels calculated by weighted root-mean-square accelerations cannot match the subjective ratings given by professional evaluators very well. Finally, a 20-128-256-256-128-6 BP neural network was established and trained. And the accuracy of evaluation based on neural network is better than evaluation based on weighted root-mean-square value. The result reveals that it is feasible to establish a neural network model based on collected naturalistic driving data to evaluate the driving comfort of vehicles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Sensor Fusion of Camera, GNSS and IMU for Autonomous Driving Navigation Collision-avoidance steering control for autonomous vehicles using fast non-singular terminal sliding mode Energy management strategy based on velocity prediction for parallel plug-in hybrid electric bus Constrained Containment Control of Agents Network with Switching Topologies Multi-parameter driver intention recognition based on neural network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1