印度的“利润办公室”概念

S. Swain
{"title":"印度的“利润办公室”概念","authors":"S. Swain","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2181796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In democratic systems across the world, there are constitutional provisions and legislations, putting a certain bar on elected representatives from holding ‘Office of Profit’. The inherent idea is to ensure that personal and pecuniary interests will not come in the way of the objective and effective discharge by the legislators of their onerous responsibilities. At the same time, it has to be borne in mind that in democratic politics, parliamentarians and legislators, besides their varied role as elected representatives, are also expected to aid and advise public institutions and trusts so as to help these institutions function efficiently for the welfare and well-being of the people and the country at large. The rationale and the raison d’etre behind the concept of ‘Office of Profit’ is that the holder of a public office should not get influenced by any consideration whatsoever while discharging his various responsibilities. An elected representative is the repository of the confidence and trust of his constituents. That being so it is imperative that they do not corrode public confidence by any act of omission or commission while performing their varied roles. It is but natural, therefore, that members are expected to act according to the highest standards of probity, accountability, honesty and integrity in the exercise of their public duties.","PeriodicalId":251521,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of 'Office of Profit' in India\",\"authors\":\"S. Swain\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2181796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In democratic systems across the world, there are constitutional provisions and legislations, putting a certain bar on elected representatives from holding ‘Office of Profit’. The inherent idea is to ensure that personal and pecuniary interests will not come in the way of the objective and effective discharge by the legislators of their onerous responsibilities. At the same time, it has to be borne in mind that in democratic politics, parliamentarians and legislators, besides their varied role as elected representatives, are also expected to aid and advise public institutions and trusts so as to help these institutions function efficiently for the welfare and well-being of the people and the country at large. The rationale and the raison d’etre behind the concept of ‘Office of Profit’ is that the holder of a public office should not get influenced by any consideration whatsoever while discharging his various responsibilities. An elected representative is the repository of the confidence and trust of his constituents. That being so it is imperative that they do not corrode public confidence by any act of omission or commission while performing their varied roles. It is but natural, therefore, that members are expected to act according to the highest standards of probity, accountability, honesty and integrity in the exercise of their public duties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2181796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Legislative & Political Process (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2181796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在世界各地的民主制度中,都有宪法条款和立法,对当选代表担任“利润办公室”设置了一定的限制。其内在理念是确保个人和金钱利益不会妨碍立法者客观有效地履行其繁重的责任。与此同时,必须记住,在民主政治中,议员和立法者除了作为当选代表的各种作用外,还应协助和建议公共机构和信托机构,以帮助这些机构有效地为人民和整个国家的福利和福祉发挥作用。“利益办公室”概念背后的基本原理和存在理由是,公职人员在履行各种职责时不应受到任何考虑的影响。当选的代表是选民信心和信任的源泉。既然如此,他们在履行其各种职责时,就必须不以任何疏忽或委托的行为损害公众的信心。因此,很自然地期望各成员在履行其公共职责时按照廉洁、负责、诚实和正直的最高标准行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Concept of 'Office of Profit' in India
In democratic systems across the world, there are constitutional provisions and legislations, putting a certain bar on elected representatives from holding ‘Office of Profit’. The inherent idea is to ensure that personal and pecuniary interests will not come in the way of the objective and effective discharge by the legislators of their onerous responsibilities. At the same time, it has to be borne in mind that in democratic politics, parliamentarians and legislators, besides their varied role as elected representatives, are also expected to aid and advise public institutions and trusts so as to help these institutions function efficiently for the welfare and well-being of the people and the country at large. The rationale and the raison d’etre behind the concept of ‘Office of Profit’ is that the holder of a public office should not get influenced by any consideration whatsoever while discharging his various responsibilities. An elected representative is the repository of the confidence and trust of his constituents. That being so it is imperative that they do not corrode public confidence by any act of omission or commission while performing their varied roles. It is but natural, therefore, that members are expected to act according to the highest standards of probity, accountability, honesty and integrity in the exercise of their public duties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Govern Conduct RegData: Australia An Assessment of Factors Important to Legislators in Budget Decisions; How Much Impact Can Agencies Have? Statutory Design as Policy Analysis Political Corruption and Legislative Complexity: A Macroeconomic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1