S. Biswas, R. Joarder, K. Choudhury, S. Adhikary, S. Acharyya, C. Dasgupta
{"title":"以蒽环类药物为基础的方案和以铂为基础的方案在三阴性乳腺癌新辅助治疗中的比较分析:一项单一机构回顾性研究","authors":"S. Biswas, R. Joarder, K. Choudhury, S. Adhikary, S. Acharyya, C. Dasgupta","doi":"10.9734/JCTI/2018/46585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to comparatively analyse the response and survival between Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel (TP) vs. 5FU plus Epirubicin plus Cyclophosphamide (FEC) in ER, PR and HER-2 neu negative Breast Cancer patients of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), large operable breast cancer (LOBC) and selected early breast cancer (EBC) patients as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: In this single institutional retrospective study total 73, AJCC 7th Stage group IIB ∼ IIIB, TNBC patients were included. Patients received 6 cycles of either Inj. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m IV plus Inj. Carboplatin at an AUC 5 IV on day1, every 21 days or Inj. 5FU 500 mg/m IV plus Inj. Epirubicin100 mg/m 2 IV plus Inj. Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2 IV on day1, every 21 days. Original Research Article Biswas et al.; JCTI, 8(2): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JCTI.46585 2 Response was assessed after 6 cycles using RECIST v1.1. Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) and adjuvant Post Mastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) were done as and when indicated. Survival benefit was comparatively analysed in terms of median progression free survival (mPFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Results: Out of total 73 Triple-negative Breast Cancer(TNBC) patients 37 (3 EBC, 11 LOBC and 23 LABC) received FEC and 36 (2 EBC, 13 LOBC and 21 LABC) received TP. Age, menopausal status and number of first/second degree relatives affected, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) were closely comparable for both arms. MRM could be done in 62.2% (FEC) and 86.1% (TP) patients (p value 0.020). PostNACT pathological T0 (ypT0) was achieved in 13.5% & 41.7% patients of FEC and TP arms, respectively (p value 0.007). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were achieved in 13.5% and 43.2% (FEC arm) vs. 33.3% and 63.9% (TP arm); p value 0.001. mPFS was 13 months(FEC) vs. 17 months(TP) (p value 0.001). No significant difference in terms of severe hematological toxicities was found (21.6% Vs 22.2%, p=0.61) though neurological toxicities were slightly more common in TP arm. Conclusion: Platin-taxane combination chemotherapy was proven promising over anthracyclinebased combination chemotherapy in neo-adjuvant setting while treating TNBC of various stages in terms of efficacy considering tolerable toxicity profile.","PeriodicalId":161223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer and Tumor International","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis between an Anthracycline Based Regimen and a Platin Based Regimen in Neoadjuvant Setting for Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Biswas, R. Joarder, K. Choudhury, S. Adhikary, S. Acharyya, C. Dasgupta\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/JCTI/2018/46585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study was designed to comparatively analyse the response and survival between Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel (TP) vs. 5FU plus Epirubicin plus Cyclophosphamide (FEC) in ER, PR and HER-2 neu negative Breast Cancer patients of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), large operable breast cancer (LOBC) and selected early breast cancer (EBC) patients as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: In this single institutional retrospective study total 73, AJCC 7th Stage group IIB ∼ IIIB, TNBC patients were included. Patients received 6 cycles of either Inj. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m IV plus Inj. Carboplatin at an AUC 5 IV on day1, every 21 days or Inj. 5FU 500 mg/m IV plus Inj. Epirubicin100 mg/m 2 IV plus Inj. Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2 IV on day1, every 21 days. Original Research Article Biswas et al.; JCTI, 8(2): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JCTI.46585 2 Response was assessed after 6 cycles using RECIST v1.1. Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) and adjuvant Post Mastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) were done as and when indicated. Survival benefit was comparatively analysed in terms of median progression free survival (mPFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Results: Out of total 73 Triple-negative Breast Cancer(TNBC) patients 37 (3 EBC, 11 LOBC and 23 LABC) received FEC and 36 (2 EBC, 13 LOBC and 21 LABC) received TP. Age, menopausal status and number of first/second degree relatives affected, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) were closely comparable for both arms. MRM could be done in 62.2% (FEC) and 86.1% (TP) patients (p value 0.020). PostNACT pathological T0 (ypT0) was achieved in 13.5% & 41.7% patients of FEC and TP arms, respectively (p value 0.007). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were achieved in 13.5% and 43.2% (FEC arm) vs. 33.3% and 63.9% (TP arm); p value 0.001. mPFS was 13 months(FEC) vs. 17 months(TP) (p value 0.001). No significant difference in terms of severe hematological toxicities was found (21.6% Vs 22.2%, p=0.61) though neurological toxicities were slightly more common in TP arm. Conclusion: Platin-taxane combination chemotherapy was proven promising over anthracyclinebased combination chemotherapy in neo-adjuvant setting while treating TNBC of various stages in terms of efficacy considering tolerable toxicity profile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer and Tumor International\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer and Tumor International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/JCTI/2018/46585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer and Tumor International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/JCTI/2018/46585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较分析卡铂+紫杉醇(TP)与5FU +表柔比星+环磷酰胺(FEC)在ER、PR和HER-2新阴性乳腺癌局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)、大可手术乳腺癌(LOBC)及部分早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者新辅助化疗(NACT)中的疗效和生存期。方法:在这项单机构回顾性研究中,共纳入73例AJCC 7期IIB ~ IIIB组TNBC患者。患者分别接受6个周期的注射。紫杉醇175 mg/m IV + Inj。卡铂在第1天AUC 5 IV,每21天或注射5FU 500 mg/m IV + Inj。表柔比星100 mg/m 2 IV + Inj。环磷酰胺500 mg/m 2 IV,第1天,每21天。Biswas et al.;生物工程学报,8(2):1-7,2018;文章no.JCTI。使用RECIST v1.1评估6个周期后的疗效。改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)和辅助乳房切除术后放射治疗(PMRT)在指征时进行。生存获益根据中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和总生存期(OS)进行比较分析。结果:73例三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者中,37例(EBC 3例,LOBC 11例,LABC 23例)接受FEC治疗,36例(EBC 2例,LOBC 13例,LABC 21例)接受TP治疗。年龄、绝经状态和受影响的一/二度亲属数量、诺丁汉预后指数(NPI)在两组中具有密切的可比性。62.2% (FEC)和86.1% (TP)的患者可以进行MRM检查(p值0.020)。FEC组和TP组术后病理T0 (ypT0)分别达到13.5%和41.7% (p值0.007)。完全缓解(CR)和部分缓解(PR)分别为13.5%和43.2% (FEC组)和33.3%和63.9% (TP组);P值0.001。mPFS分别为13个月(FEC)和17个月(TP) (p值0.001)。在严重的血液学毒性方面没有发现显著差异(21.6% Vs 22.2%, p=0.61),尽管神经毒性在TP组中略常见。结论:在新辅助治疗中,铂紫杉烷联合化疗在治疗不同分期TNBC的疗效方面优于蒽环类联合化疗。
Comparative Analysis between an Anthracycline Based Regimen and a Platin Based Regimen in Neoadjuvant Setting for Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Retrospective Study
Objective: This study was designed to comparatively analyse the response and survival between Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel (TP) vs. 5FU plus Epirubicin plus Cyclophosphamide (FEC) in ER, PR and HER-2 neu negative Breast Cancer patients of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), large operable breast cancer (LOBC) and selected early breast cancer (EBC) patients as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: In this single institutional retrospective study total 73, AJCC 7th Stage group IIB ∼ IIIB, TNBC patients were included. Patients received 6 cycles of either Inj. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m IV plus Inj. Carboplatin at an AUC 5 IV on day1, every 21 days or Inj. 5FU 500 mg/m IV plus Inj. Epirubicin100 mg/m 2 IV plus Inj. Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2 IV on day1, every 21 days. Original Research Article Biswas et al.; JCTI, 8(2): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JCTI.46585 2 Response was assessed after 6 cycles using RECIST v1.1. Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) and adjuvant Post Mastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) were done as and when indicated. Survival benefit was comparatively analysed in terms of median progression free survival (mPFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Results: Out of total 73 Triple-negative Breast Cancer(TNBC) patients 37 (3 EBC, 11 LOBC and 23 LABC) received FEC and 36 (2 EBC, 13 LOBC and 21 LABC) received TP. Age, menopausal status and number of first/second degree relatives affected, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) were closely comparable for both arms. MRM could be done in 62.2% (FEC) and 86.1% (TP) patients (p value 0.020). PostNACT pathological T0 (ypT0) was achieved in 13.5% & 41.7% patients of FEC and TP arms, respectively (p value 0.007). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were achieved in 13.5% and 43.2% (FEC arm) vs. 33.3% and 63.9% (TP arm); p value 0.001. mPFS was 13 months(FEC) vs. 17 months(TP) (p value 0.001). No significant difference in terms of severe hematological toxicities was found (21.6% Vs 22.2%, p=0.61) though neurological toxicities were slightly more common in TP arm. Conclusion: Platin-taxane combination chemotherapy was proven promising over anthracyclinebased combination chemotherapy in neo-adjuvant setting while treating TNBC of various stages in terms of efficacy considering tolerable toxicity profile.