{"title":"软件测试方法的比较","authors":"C. Smidts, D. Sova","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental aim of this study is to better understand the software testing process within the Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL) to be able to continually improve the software development process. In particular we compare three testing methodologies employed within the SEL. The software development life cycle process, the testing methodologies and their comparison, and the software application are discussed.","PeriodicalId":143102,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of software-testing methodologies\",\"authors\":\"C. Smidts, D. Sova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fundamental aim of this study is to better understand the software testing process within the Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL) to be able to continually improve the software development process. In particular we compare three testing methodologies employed within the SEL. The software development life cycle process, the testing methodologies and their comparison, and the software application are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The fundamental aim of this study is to better understand the software testing process within the Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL) to be able to continually improve the software development process. In particular we compare three testing methodologies employed within the SEL. The software development life cycle process, the testing methodologies and their comparison, and the software application are discussed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
