所有的目光都盯着我:第三方追踪器从医疗保健提供商的在线系统中窃取PHI的内幕

Mingjia Huo, M. Bland, Kirill Levchenko
{"title":"所有的目光都盯着我:第三方追踪器从医疗保健提供商的在线系统中窃取PHI的内幕","authors":"Mingjia Huo, M. Bland, Kirill Levchenko","doi":"10.1145/3559613.3563190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, sensitive health information is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). This act limits the disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) without the patient's consent or knowledge. However, as medical care becomes web-integrated, many providers have chosen to use third-party web trackers for measurement and marketing purposes. This presents a security concern: third-party JavaScript requested by an online healthcare system can read the website's contents, and ensuring PHI is not unintentionally or maliciously leaked becomes difficult. In this paper, we investigate health information breaches in online medical records, focusing on 459 online patient portals and 4 telehealth websites. We find 14% of patient portals include Google Analytics, which reveals (at a minimum) the fact that the user visited the health provider website, while 5 portals and 4 telehealth websites contained JavaScript-based services disclosing PHI, including medications and lab results, to third parties. The most significant PHI breaches were on behalf of Google and Facebook trackers. In the latter case, an estimated 4.5 million site visitors per month were potentially exposed to leaks of personal information (names, phone numbers) and medical information (test results, medications). We notified healthcare providers of the PHI breaches and found only 15.7% took action to correct leaks. Healthcare operators lacked the technical expertise to identify PHI breaches caused by third-party trackers. After notifying Epic, a healthcare portal vendor, of the PHI leaks, we received a prompt response and observed extensive mitigation across providers, suggesting vendor notification is an effective intervention against PHI disclosures.","PeriodicalId":416548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All Eyes On Me: Inside Third Party Trackers' Exfiltration of PHI from Healthcare Providers' Online Systems\",\"authors\":\"Mingjia Huo, M. Bland, Kirill Levchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3559613.3563190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, sensitive health information is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). This act limits the disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) without the patient's consent or knowledge. However, as medical care becomes web-integrated, many providers have chosen to use third-party web trackers for measurement and marketing purposes. This presents a security concern: third-party JavaScript requested by an online healthcare system can read the website's contents, and ensuring PHI is not unintentionally or maliciously leaked becomes difficult. In this paper, we investigate health information breaches in online medical records, focusing on 459 online patient portals and 4 telehealth websites. We find 14% of patient portals include Google Analytics, which reveals (at a minimum) the fact that the user visited the health provider website, while 5 portals and 4 telehealth websites contained JavaScript-based services disclosing PHI, including medications and lab results, to third parties. The most significant PHI breaches were on behalf of Google and Facebook trackers. In the latter case, an estimated 4.5 million site visitors per month were potentially exposed to leaks of personal information (names, phone numbers) and medical information (test results, medications). We notified healthcare providers of the PHI breaches and found only 15.7% took action to correct leaks. Healthcare operators lacked the technical expertise to identify PHI breaches caused by third-party trackers. After notifying Epic, a healthcare portal vendor, of the PHI leaks, we received a prompt response and observed extensive mitigation across providers, suggesting vendor notification is an effective intervention against PHI disclosures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3559613.3563190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3559613.3563190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在美国,敏感的健康信息受到《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的保护。该法案限制在未经患者同意或知情的情况下披露受保护的健康信息(PHI)。然而,随着医疗服务与网络的整合,许多供应商选择使用第三方网络追踪器来进行测量和营销。这带来了一个安全问题:在线医疗保健系统请求的第三方JavaScript可以读取网站的内容,并且确保PHI不会无意或恶意泄露变得困难。本文以459个在线患者门户网站和4个远程医疗网站为研究对象,对在线医疗记录中的健康信息泄露进行了调查。我们发现14%的患者门户网站包括Google Analytics(谷歌分析),它(至少)揭示了用户访问过医疗服务提供者网站的事实,而5个门户网站和4个远程医疗网站包含基于javascript的服务,向第三方披露PHI,包括药物和实验室结果。最严重的PHI泄露是代表谷歌和Facebook的跟踪器。在后一种情况下,估计每月有450万网站访问者可能面临个人信息(姓名、电话号码)和医疗信息(检查结果、药物)泄露的风险。我们将PHI泄露通知了医疗保健提供者,发现只有15.7%的人采取了纠正泄漏的行动。医疗保健运营商缺乏技术专长,无法识别第三方跟踪器造成的PHI泄露。在向医疗保健门户供应商Epic通报PHI泄漏后,我们收到了迅速的响应,并观察到供应商之间的广泛缓解,这表明供应商通知是针对PHI泄露的有效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
All Eyes On Me: Inside Third Party Trackers' Exfiltration of PHI from Healthcare Providers' Online Systems
In the United States, sensitive health information is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). This act limits the disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) without the patient's consent or knowledge. However, as medical care becomes web-integrated, many providers have chosen to use third-party web trackers for measurement and marketing purposes. This presents a security concern: third-party JavaScript requested by an online healthcare system can read the website's contents, and ensuring PHI is not unintentionally or maliciously leaked becomes difficult. In this paper, we investigate health information breaches in online medical records, focusing on 459 online patient portals and 4 telehealth websites. We find 14% of patient portals include Google Analytics, which reveals (at a minimum) the fact that the user visited the health provider website, while 5 portals and 4 telehealth websites contained JavaScript-based services disclosing PHI, including medications and lab results, to third parties. The most significant PHI breaches were on behalf of Google and Facebook trackers. In the latter case, an estimated 4.5 million site visitors per month were potentially exposed to leaks of personal information (names, phone numbers) and medical information (test results, medications). We notified healthcare providers of the PHI breaches and found only 15.7% took action to correct leaks. Healthcare operators lacked the technical expertise to identify PHI breaches caused by third-party trackers. After notifying Epic, a healthcare portal vendor, of the PHI leaks, we received a prompt response and observed extensive mitigation across providers, suggesting vendor notification is an effective intervention against PHI disclosures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Darwin's Theory of Censorship: Analysing the Evolution of Censored Topics with Dynamic Topic Models PRSONA Tracking the Evolution of Cookie-based Tracking on Facebook Fingerprinting and Personal Information Leakage from Touchscreen Interactions Privacy and Security Evaluation of Mobile Payment Applications Through User-Generated Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1