假设消费者是理性的合理吗?理性选择理论的消费者心理学视角

J. Jacoby
{"title":"假设消费者是理性的合理吗?理性选择理论的消费者心理学视角","authors":"J. Jacoby","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.239538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Law-and-economics,\" an influential perspective among some in law (and possibly a few in economics), seeks to apply the basic assumption of economics ? that people are \"rational maximizers\" (i.e., will try to get the most out of what they have) ? to law. Rational Choice Theory provides the conceptual core of Law-and-economics. After briefly discussing the intellectual heritage of Rational Choice Theory, we address three things. Operating from a consumer psychological perspective, first we examine fundamental assumptions underlying Rational Choice Theory and conclude that many either are, or approach being, untenable. Next, we comment upon arguments raised by Judge Richard Posner (one of the leading proponents of this theory) in defense and elucidation of Rational Choice Theory. We conclude by offering some suggestions which, if adopted, we believe will advance the empirical assessment of Rational Choice Theory.","PeriodicalId":300536,"journal":{"name":"Roger Williams university law review","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it Rational to Assume Consumer Rationality? Some Consumer Psychological Perspectives on Rational Choice Theory\",\"authors\":\"J. Jacoby\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.239538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Law-and-economics,\\\" an influential perspective among some in law (and possibly a few in economics), seeks to apply the basic assumption of economics ? that people are \\\"rational maximizers\\\" (i.e., will try to get the most out of what they have) ? to law. Rational Choice Theory provides the conceptual core of Law-and-economics. After briefly discussing the intellectual heritage of Rational Choice Theory, we address three things. Operating from a consumer psychological perspective, first we examine fundamental assumptions underlying Rational Choice Theory and conclude that many either are, or approach being, untenable. Next, we comment upon arguments raised by Judge Richard Posner (one of the leading proponents of this theory) in defense and elucidation of Rational Choice Theory. We conclude by offering some suggestions which, if adopted, we believe will advance the empirical assessment of Rational Choice Theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roger Williams university law review\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roger Williams university law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.239538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roger Williams university law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.239538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

“法律与经济学”是一些法律界人士(可能还有一些经济学人士)颇具影响力的观点,它试图应用经济学的基本假设。人们是“理性的最大化者”(即,会尽量从他们所拥有的东西中得到最多)?法律。理性选择理论提供了法律经济学的概念核心。在简短地讨论了理性选择理论的知识遗产之后,我们要讨论三件事。从消费者心理学的角度出发,我们首先考察了理性选择理论的基本假设,并得出结论,许多假设要么是站不住脚的,要么是接近站不住脚的。接下来,我们将评论理查德·波斯纳法官(该理论的主要支持者之一)为理性选择理论辩护和阐明的论点。最后,我们提出了一些建议,如果这些建议被采纳,我们相信将推进理性选择理论的实证评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is it Rational to Assume Consumer Rationality? Some Consumer Psychological Perspectives on Rational Choice Theory
"Law-and-economics," an influential perspective among some in law (and possibly a few in economics), seeks to apply the basic assumption of economics ? that people are "rational maximizers" (i.e., will try to get the most out of what they have) ? to law. Rational Choice Theory provides the conceptual core of Law-and-economics. After briefly discussing the intellectual heritage of Rational Choice Theory, we address three things. Operating from a consumer psychological perspective, first we examine fundamental assumptions underlying Rational Choice Theory and conclude that many either are, or approach being, untenable. Next, we comment upon arguments raised by Judge Richard Posner (one of the leading proponents of this theory) in defense and elucidation of Rational Choice Theory. We conclude by offering some suggestions which, if adopted, we believe will advance the empirical assessment of Rational Choice Theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Labor Law Illiteracy: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis and Janus v. AFSCME Taking Justice Kennedy Seriously: Why Windsor Was Decided "quite apart from principles of federalism Comparative Law Methodology & American Legal Culture: Obstacles and Opportunities The Tenuous Case for Conscience Product-Related Risk and Cognitive Biases: The Shortcomings of Enterprise Liability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1