沙特英语写作中最大化者的语义韵律和语义偏好

Mashael Alrajhi
{"title":"沙特英语写作中最大化者的语义韵律和语义偏好","authors":"Mashael Alrajhi","doi":"10.30845/ijll.v6n3p5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semantic prosody is the co-occurrence of words with other words that belong to a particular semantic set. A related concept is semantic preference, which is the relation, not between individual words, but between a lemma or word-form and a set of semantically related words. Previous interlinguistic studies on semantic prosody show that EFL learners often make semantic prosodic errors in communication as they rarely notice the semantic prosody of the items they learn. The study investigates the semantic prosody and semantic preference found in EFL Saudi students’ writings in relation to the use of four maximizers: completely, entirely, totally, and utterly.The results are compared to findings obtained from a study by Partington (2004) in which the same maximizers were investigated utilizing data obtained from the Cobuild corpus. Results regarding semantic prosody show a significant difference. In Partington’s study, utterly had an unfavorable implication whereas the other three maximizers appeared to have an even balance between favorable and unfavorable items. All the four maximizers used in the students’ writings had a favorable prosody. In relation to semantic preference, many items found in the students’ writings belong to a semantic set related to emotions and states of mind, which is not the case with the results in Partington’s study. Another difference is that all the four maximizers exhibited a tendency to occur in the corpus with words related to absence, whereas the data collected from students’ writings shows that students barely used words that relate to absence with maximizers. The similarities in collocational behavior include using the maximizers with collocations related to change, dependency and independency.","PeriodicalId":409958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference of Maximizers in Saudi EFL Writings\",\"authors\":\"Mashael Alrajhi\",\"doi\":\"10.30845/ijll.v6n3p5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Semantic prosody is the co-occurrence of words with other words that belong to a particular semantic set. A related concept is semantic preference, which is the relation, not between individual words, but between a lemma or word-form and a set of semantically related words. Previous interlinguistic studies on semantic prosody show that EFL learners often make semantic prosodic errors in communication as they rarely notice the semantic prosody of the items they learn. The study investigates the semantic prosody and semantic preference found in EFL Saudi students’ writings in relation to the use of four maximizers: completely, entirely, totally, and utterly.The results are compared to findings obtained from a study by Partington (2004) in which the same maximizers were investigated utilizing data obtained from the Cobuild corpus. Results regarding semantic prosody show a significant difference. In Partington’s study, utterly had an unfavorable implication whereas the other three maximizers appeared to have an even balance between favorable and unfavorable items. All the four maximizers used in the students’ writings had a favorable prosody. In relation to semantic preference, many items found in the students’ writings belong to a semantic set related to emotions and states of mind, which is not the case with the results in Partington’s study. Another difference is that all the four maximizers exhibited a tendency to occur in the corpus with words related to absence, whereas the data collected from students’ writings shows that students barely used words that relate to absence with maximizers. The similarities in collocational behavior include using the maximizers with collocations related to change, dependency and independency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v6n3p5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v6n3p5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

语义韵律是指属于特定语义集的词与其他词的共现。一个相关的概念是语义偏好,它不是单个词之间的关系,而是引理或词形与一组语义相关的词之间的关系。以往关于语义韵律的语际研究表明,英语学习者在交际中往往会出现语义韵律错误,因为他们很少注意到所学词汇的语义韵律。本研究调查了沙特英语学生写作中的语义韵律和语义偏好与四个最大化词:complete, totally, totally和totally的使用之间的关系。结果与Partington(2004)的一项研究结果进行了比较,该研究利用从Cobuild语料库获得的数据调查了相同的最大化者。语义韵律方面的结果存在显著差异。在帕廷顿的研究中,完全具有不利的含义而其他三个最大化者在有利和不利的事物之间似乎有平衡。学生写作中使用的所有四个最大化词都有良好的韵律。在语义偏好方面,学生写作中的许多项目都属于与情绪和心理状态相关的语义集,而Partington的研究结果并非如此。另一个不同之处在于,所有四个最大化词都倾向于在语料库中出现与缺席相关的词,而从学生写作中收集的数据显示,学生很少使用与缺席相关的词和最大化词。搭配行为的相似之处包括在与变化、依赖和独立相关的搭配中使用最大化者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference of Maximizers in Saudi EFL Writings
Semantic prosody is the co-occurrence of words with other words that belong to a particular semantic set. A related concept is semantic preference, which is the relation, not between individual words, but between a lemma or word-form and a set of semantically related words. Previous interlinguistic studies on semantic prosody show that EFL learners often make semantic prosodic errors in communication as they rarely notice the semantic prosody of the items they learn. The study investigates the semantic prosody and semantic preference found in EFL Saudi students’ writings in relation to the use of four maximizers: completely, entirely, totally, and utterly.The results are compared to findings obtained from a study by Partington (2004) in which the same maximizers were investigated utilizing data obtained from the Cobuild corpus. Results regarding semantic prosody show a significant difference. In Partington’s study, utterly had an unfavorable implication whereas the other three maximizers appeared to have an even balance between favorable and unfavorable items. All the four maximizers used in the students’ writings had a favorable prosody. In relation to semantic preference, many items found in the students’ writings belong to a semantic set related to emotions and states of mind, which is not the case with the results in Partington’s study. Another difference is that all the four maximizers exhibited a tendency to occur in the corpus with words related to absence, whereas the data collected from students’ writings shows that students barely used words that relate to absence with maximizers. The similarities in collocational behavior include using the maximizers with collocations related to change, dependency and independency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Word Association Responses in L1 and L2 to the Chinese Word Yueliang (Moon): Implications for L2 Vocabulary Instruction Language Maintenance among Minority Languages with Special Reference to Leya Language of Chief Mukuni, Southern Province Kenya Airways Dominant Image Restoration Strategies during the 2015/16 Financial Crisis Students' Grammatical Errors as Corrected by English Teachers at Secondary Schools in Sudan Teacher Supervision Program to Enhance Teacher’s Learning to Teach Glocal Englishes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1