{"title":"基于Levenberg-Marquardt方法和人工蜂群算法的无线胶囊内窥镜5D磁定位","authors":"Memduh Suveren, M. Kanaan","doi":"10.1109/PIMRCW.2019.8880830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, magnetic positioning process is performed by WCE method which is mostly preferred in recent years. In order to make 5D magnetic positioning possible, two different algorithms were used to solve nonlinear mathematical dipole equations; Artificial Bee Colony algorithm and Levenberg-Marquardt method. In case of using both algorithms separately and hybrid, performance comparison was made and the effect of noise on positioning error was investigated. As a result, we obtained a position error of less than 0.65 mm and orientation error of less than 0.8° in the absence of noise and in case of noise addition, we had an average position error of 6.45 mm and a 9% angle error.","PeriodicalId":158659,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC Workshops)","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5D Magnetic Localization for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy Using the Levenberg-Marquardt Method and Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Memduh Suveren, M. Kanaan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PIMRCW.2019.8880830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, magnetic positioning process is performed by WCE method which is mostly preferred in recent years. In order to make 5D magnetic positioning possible, two different algorithms were used to solve nonlinear mathematical dipole equations; Artificial Bee Colony algorithm and Levenberg-Marquardt method. In case of using both algorithms separately and hybrid, performance comparison was made and the effect of noise on positioning error was investigated. As a result, we obtained a position error of less than 0.65 mm and orientation error of less than 0.8° in the absence of noise and in case of noise addition, we had an average position error of 6.45 mm and a 9% angle error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC Workshops)\",\"volume\":\"207 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC Workshops)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRCW.2019.8880830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC Workshops)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRCW.2019.8880830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
5D Magnetic Localization for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy Using the Levenberg-Marquardt Method and Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm
In this study, magnetic positioning process is performed by WCE method which is mostly preferred in recent years. In order to make 5D magnetic positioning possible, two different algorithms were used to solve nonlinear mathematical dipole equations; Artificial Bee Colony algorithm and Levenberg-Marquardt method. In case of using both algorithms separately and hybrid, performance comparison was made and the effect of noise on positioning error was investigated. As a result, we obtained a position error of less than 0.65 mm and orientation error of less than 0.8° in the absence of noise and in case of noise addition, we had an average position error of 6.45 mm and a 9% angle error.