P. Schuddinck, F. M. Bufler, Y. Xiang, A. Farokhnejad, G. Mirabelli, A. Vandooren, B. Chehab, A. Gupta, C. Neve, G. Hellings, J. Ryckaert
{"title":"PPAC基于薄片的cfeet配置,采用16nm金属间距的4轨设计","authors":"P. Schuddinck, F. M. Bufler, Y. Xiang, A. Farokhnejad, G. Mirabelli, A. Vandooren, B. Chehab, A. Gupta, C. Neve, G. Hellings, J. Ryckaert","doi":"10.1109/vlsitechnologyandcir46769.2022.9830492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate Power-Performance-Area & Cost (PPAC) for nanosheet (NS), forksheet (FS), monolithic & sequential Complementary FET (CFET) at 5 & 4 track (T) designs with tight gate pitch (CPP) & metal pitch (MP). While NS & FS prove unsuitable for 4T designs, CFETs provide a performant & cost-effective 4T solution.","PeriodicalId":332454,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PPAC of sheet-based CFET configurations for 4 track design with 16nm metal pitch\",\"authors\":\"P. Schuddinck, F. M. Bufler, Y. Xiang, A. Farokhnejad, G. Mirabelli, A. Vandooren, B. Chehab, A. Gupta, C. Neve, G. Hellings, J. Ryckaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/vlsitechnologyandcir46769.2022.9830492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluate Power-Performance-Area & Cost (PPAC) for nanosheet (NS), forksheet (FS), monolithic & sequential Complementary FET (CFET) at 5 & 4 track (T) designs with tight gate pitch (CPP) & metal pitch (MP). While NS & FS prove unsuitable for 4T designs, CFETs provide a performant & cost-effective 4T solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/vlsitechnologyandcir46769.2022.9830492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/vlsitechnologyandcir46769.2022.9830492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
PPAC of sheet-based CFET configurations for 4 track design with 16nm metal pitch
We evaluate Power-Performance-Area & Cost (PPAC) for nanosheet (NS), forksheet (FS), monolithic & sequential Complementary FET (CFET) at 5 & 4 track (T) designs with tight gate pitch (CPP) & metal pitch (MP). While NS & FS prove unsuitable for 4T designs, CFETs provide a performant & cost-effective 4T solution.