{"title":"孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交","authors":"B. Mostofi","doi":"10.5860/choice.49-6537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A SINGLE ROLL OF THE DICE: OBAMA'S DIPLOMACY WITH IRAN by Trita Parsi New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012 (ix + 240 pages, notes, index) $27.50 (cloth), $17.00 (paper)With the election of Barack Hussein Obama to the White House in 2008, expectations ran high for a major shi in US-Iranian relations from the stando of the Bush era to a new period of diplomacy. Trita Parsi's A Single Roll of the Dice details what became of those expectations for a foreign policy reboot. Relying primarily on interviews with negotiators and diplomats- from the United States, the European Union, and Iran, as well as Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Brazil, and Turkey-and secondarily on news media coverage and leaked classied documents, Parsi oers an exhaustive account of the Obama administration's Iran policy that reads at times like an investigative journalist's thriller, a la All The President's Men.Parsi heralds Obama's arrival to the scene as wiping the slate clean: he contests the dominant Western media narrative that the United States and Iran are headed inevitably toward military confrontation. Such fatalism, he argues, is a false premise if the political will for a diplomatic solution truly exists. In contrast to the supercial coverage in the US mainstream media, Parsi delivers a substantive play-by-play account of the Obama administration's policy toward Iran that begins with the possibilities for a peaceful resolution to the current crisis. His analysis of events during the rst two years of Obama's presidency asks whether the potential for real diplomacy between these two states existed. He discusses the circumstances that led to diplomatic failure and provides a framework for what he believes is necessary for meaningful diplomacy to occur.Unlike others writing on US-Iranian relations, and specically the nuclear issue, Parsi does not undertake a serious discussion of Iran's nuclear history, its cooperation or lack thereof with the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA), or its compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Nor does he spend much time weighing the likely consequences of war- or continued sanctions-for Iran's nuclear program. Instead, he focuses his research on policy decisions. It could be argued that in choosing this approach Parsi presents a dangerous framework, whereby the facts have little to no relevance to policy-making. Yet with this framing Parsi is able to show how the substance of the issues falls prey to the politics of each state, thus placing negotiations in constant peril.The book begins with the negotiations that started in the fall of 2009. Parsi describes the US political climate in which Obama's policy was formed, introduces the political actors (both domestic and international), and plumbs the three-decade-long abyss that has dened US-Iranian rela- tions. He concludes that Obama's push toward diplomacy was sincere and suitable for the political moment in which he came to oce, when it was obvious that Bush-era threats and belligerence had failed to slow down Iran's nuclear program, let alone broker a nuclear deal. But though he takes Obama's stated intention to pursue diplomacy at face value, Parsi contends that what awaited the new president was a series of obstacles that would render diplomacy nearly impossible.In the following chapters, Parsi lays out the various interests that overshadowed Obama's will to diplomacy, adding a new dimension to the story that previous accounts have failed to capture. First, he describes the European Union's, and particularly France's, inammatory rhetoric toward Iran, as well as EU support for harsher sanctions as a precursor to negotiations. Second, he demonstrates the lack of support for diplomacy from Iran's Arab neighbors, like Saudi Arabia, in part due to their fears of growing Iranian power in the region. He also describes at length the inu- ence of Israel and Israeli advocacy groups, which staunchly opposed Iran attaining any nuclear know-how and insisted on keeping the military option on the table. …","PeriodicalId":184252,"journal":{"name":"Arab Studies Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama's Diplomacy with Iran\",\"authors\":\"B. Mostofi\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.49-6537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A SINGLE ROLL OF THE DICE: OBAMA'S DIPLOMACY WITH IRAN by Trita Parsi New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012 (ix + 240 pages, notes, index) $27.50 (cloth), $17.00 (paper)With the election of Barack Hussein Obama to the White House in 2008, expectations ran high for a major shi in US-Iranian relations from the stando of the Bush era to a new period of diplomacy. Trita Parsi's A Single Roll of the Dice details what became of those expectations for a foreign policy reboot. Relying primarily on interviews with negotiators and diplomats- from the United States, the European Union, and Iran, as well as Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Brazil, and Turkey-and secondarily on news media coverage and leaked classied documents, Parsi oers an exhaustive account of the Obama administration's Iran policy that reads at times like an investigative journalist's thriller, a la All The President's Men.Parsi heralds Obama's arrival to the scene as wiping the slate clean: he contests the dominant Western media narrative that the United States and Iran are headed inevitably toward military confrontation. Such fatalism, he argues, is a false premise if the political will for a diplomatic solution truly exists. In contrast to the supercial coverage in the US mainstream media, Parsi delivers a substantive play-by-play account of the Obama administration's policy toward Iran that begins with the possibilities for a peaceful resolution to the current crisis. His analysis of events during the rst two years of Obama's presidency asks whether the potential for real diplomacy between these two states existed. He discusses the circumstances that led to diplomatic failure and provides a framework for what he believes is necessary for meaningful diplomacy to occur.Unlike others writing on US-Iranian relations, and specically the nuclear issue, Parsi does not undertake a serious discussion of Iran's nuclear history, its cooperation or lack thereof with the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA), or its compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Nor does he spend much time weighing the likely consequences of war- or continued sanctions-for Iran's nuclear program. Instead, he focuses his research on policy decisions. It could be argued that in choosing this approach Parsi presents a dangerous framework, whereby the facts have little to no relevance to policy-making. Yet with this framing Parsi is able to show how the substance of the issues falls prey to the politics of each state, thus placing negotiations in constant peril.The book begins with the negotiations that started in the fall of 2009. Parsi describes the US political climate in which Obama's policy was formed, introduces the political actors (both domestic and international), and plumbs the three-decade-long abyss that has dened US-Iranian rela- tions. He concludes that Obama's push toward diplomacy was sincere and suitable for the political moment in which he came to oce, when it was obvious that Bush-era threats and belligerence had failed to slow down Iran's nuclear program, let alone broker a nuclear deal. But though he takes Obama's stated intention to pursue diplomacy at face value, Parsi contends that what awaited the new president was a series of obstacles that would render diplomacy nearly impossible.In the following chapters, Parsi lays out the various interests that overshadowed Obama's will to diplomacy, adding a new dimension to the story that previous accounts have failed to capture. First, he describes the European Union's, and particularly France's, inammatory rhetoric toward Iran, as well as EU support for harsher sanctions as a precursor to negotiations. Second, he demonstrates the lack of support for diplomacy from Iran's Arab neighbors, like Saudi Arabia, in part due to their fears of growing Iranian power in the region. He also describes at length the inu- ence of Israel and Israeli advocacy groups, which staunchly opposed Iran attaining any nuclear know-how and insisted on keeping the military option on the table. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":184252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34
摘要
《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》作者:Trita Parsi《孤注一掷:奥巴马与伊朗的外交》特里塔·帕西(Trita Parsi)的《掷一次骰子》(A Single Roll of the Dice)详细描述了人们对外交政策重启的期望。主要依靠对谈判代表和外交官的采访——来自美国、欧盟和伊朗,以及俄罗斯、以色列、沙特阿拉伯、日本、巴西和土耳其——其次是新闻媒体报道和泄露的机密文件,帕西详尽地描述了奥巴马政府的伊朗政策,有时读起来像调查记者的惊悚片,就像《总统的男人》(All the President’s Men)。帕西预言奥巴马的到来将把过去一笔勾销:他反驳了西方主流媒体关于美国和伊朗不可避免地走向军事对抗的说法。他认为,如果外交解决方案的政治意愿真的存在,那么这种宿命论就是一个错误的前提。与美国主流媒体的肤浅报道相反,帕西对奥巴马政府的伊朗政策进行了实质性的详细描述,从和平解决当前危机的可能性开始。他对奥巴马总统任期后两年发生的事件进行了分析,问这两个国家之间是否存在真正的外交潜力。他讨论了导致外交失败的情况,并提供了一个框架,他认为有意义的外交是必要的。与其他关于美伊关系,特别是核问题的文章不同,帕西并没有认真讨论伊朗的核历史,伊朗与国际原子能协会(IAEA)的合作或缺乏合作,以及伊朗对《核不扩散条约》的遵守情况。他也没有花太多时间权衡战争或持续制裁对伊朗核计划可能造成的后果。相反,他把研究重点放在政策决策上。可以认为,帕西在选择这种方法时提出了一个危险的框架,在这个框架中,事实与决策几乎没有关系。然而,通过这种框架,帕西能够展示问题的实质如何成为每个国家政治的牺牲品,从而使谈判处于持续的危险之中。这本书从2009年秋天开始的谈判开始。帕西描述了奥巴马政策形成的美国政治气候,介绍了政治角色(国内和国际),并探究了三十年来削弱美伊关系的深渊。他的结论是,奥巴马对外交的推动是真诚的,适合他所处的政治时刻,当时布什时代的威胁和好战显然未能减缓伊朗的核计划,更不用说促成核协议了。但是,尽管他从表面上理解了奥巴马寻求外交途径的意图,帕西认为,等待新总统的是一系列障碍,这些障碍将使外交手段几乎不可能实现。在接下来的章节中,帕西列出了遮蔽奥巴马外交意愿的各种利益,为之前的叙述未能捕捉到的故事增加了一个新的维度。首先,他描述了欧盟,尤其是法国对伊朗的煽动性言论,以及欧盟支持将更严厉的制裁作为谈判的前兆。其次,他表明沙特阿拉伯等伊朗的阿拉伯邻国缺乏对外交手段的支持,部分原因是他们担心伊朗在该地区的实力日益增强。他还详细描述了以色列和以色列支持团体的影响,这些团体坚决反对伊朗获得任何核技术,并坚持将军事选项保留在谈判桌上。…
A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama's Diplomacy with Iran
A SINGLE ROLL OF THE DICE: OBAMA'S DIPLOMACY WITH IRAN by Trita Parsi New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012 (ix + 240 pages, notes, index) $27.50 (cloth), $17.00 (paper)With the election of Barack Hussein Obama to the White House in 2008, expectations ran high for a major shi in US-Iranian relations from the stando of the Bush era to a new period of diplomacy. Trita Parsi's A Single Roll of the Dice details what became of those expectations for a foreign policy reboot. Relying primarily on interviews with negotiators and diplomats- from the United States, the European Union, and Iran, as well as Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Brazil, and Turkey-and secondarily on news media coverage and leaked classied documents, Parsi oers an exhaustive account of the Obama administration's Iran policy that reads at times like an investigative journalist's thriller, a la All The President's Men.Parsi heralds Obama's arrival to the scene as wiping the slate clean: he contests the dominant Western media narrative that the United States and Iran are headed inevitably toward military confrontation. Such fatalism, he argues, is a false premise if the political will for a diplomatic solution truly exists. In contrast to the supercial coverage in the US mainstream media, Parsi delivers a substantive play-by-play account of the Obama administration's policy toward Iran that begins with the possibilities for a peaceful resolution to the current crisis. His analysis of events during the rst two years of Obama's presidency asks whether the potential for real diplomacy between these two states existed. He discusses the circumstances that led to diplomatic failure and provides a framework for what he believes is necessary for meaningful diplomacy to occur.Unlike others writing on US-Iranian relations, and specically the nuclear issue, Parsi does not undertake a serious discussion of Iran's nuclear history, its cooperation or lack thereof with the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA), or its compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Nor does he spend much time weighing the likely consequences of war- or continued sanctions-for Iran's nuclear program. Instead, he focuses his research on policy decisions. It could be argued that in choosing this approach Parsi presents a dangerous framework, whereby the facts have little to no relevance to policy-making. Yet with this framing Parsi is able to show how the substance of the issues falls prey to the politics of each state, thus placing negotiations in constant peril.The book begins with the negotiations that started in the fall of 2009. Parsi describes the US political climate in which Obama's policy was formed, introduces the political actors (both domestic and international), and plumbs the three-decade-long abyss that has dened US-Iranian rela- tions. He concludes that Obama's push toward diplomacy was sincere and suitable for the political moment in which he came to oce, when it was obvious that Bush-era threats and belligerence had failed to slow down Iran's nuclear program, let alone broker a nuclear deal. But though he takes Obama's stated intention to pursue diplomacy at face value, Parsi contends that what awaited the new president was a series of obstacles that would render diplomacy nearly impossible.In the following chapters, Parsi lays out the various interests that overshadowed Obama's will to diplomacy, adding a new dimension to the story that previous accounts have failed to capture. First, he describes the European Union's, and particularly France's, inammatory rhetoric toward Iran, as well as EU support for harsher sanctions as a precursor to negotiations. Second, he demonstrates the lack of support for diplomacy from Iran's Arab neighbors, like Saudi Arabia, in part due to their fears of growing Iranian power in the region. He also describes at length the inu- ence of Israel and Israeli advocacy groups, which staunchly opposed Iran attaining any nuclear know-how and insisted on keeping the military option on the table. …