灾难时代的大屠杀研究

Atina Grossmann
{"title":"灾难时代的大屠杀研究","authors":"Atina Grossmann","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2021.1911133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Written and revised in stages, from the “BC,” pre-COVID “Age of Trump” era to an uncertain current transitional moment in February 2021, the article considers questions about shifting approaches to research, teaching, and public engagement in Holocaust Studies and the history of National Socialism. It argues that, precisely in order to deepen and focus understanding of the Nazi legacy in the “Age of Trump,” especially among diverse politically attuned students, we can no longer think the Holocaust outside of a more comparative history of genocide, war, displacement, and extreme violence across time and place. The article suggests two specific arenas of inquiry that seem especially suitable for this ongoing rethinking and repositioning of Nazism and the Holocaust in comparative studies of trauma and resistance. First, a focus on expanding the chronological and geographical parameters to highlight the global dimensions of flight and rescue, especially in non-Western colonial or semi-colonial regions. Secondly, recent scholarship on gender—a “Holocaust #MeToo” moment—revealing still mostly untold stories about sexual violence and coercion as well as instrumental sexuality, desire, and even love during the Holocaust, opens up questions that can both integrate and differentiate histories of Nazism and the Holocaust in comparative studies and contemporary experience.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holocaust Studies in Our Age of Catastrophe\",\"authors\":\"Atina Grossmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785648.2021.1911133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Written and revised in stages, from the “BC,” pre-COVID “Age of Trump” era to an uncertain current transitional moment in February 2021, the article considers questions about shifting approaches to research, teaching, and public engagement in Holocaust Studies and the history of National Socialism. It argues that, precisely in order to deepen and focus understanding of the Nazi legacy in the “Age of Trump,” especially among diverse politically attuned students, we can no longer think the Holocaust outside of a more comparative history of genocide, war, displacement, and extreme violence across time and place. The article suggests two specific arenas of inquiry that seem especially suitable for this ongoing rethinking and repositioning of Nazism and the Holocaust in comparative studies of trauma and resistance. First, a focus on expanding the chronological and geographical parameters to highlight the global dimensions of flight and rescue, especially in non-Western colonial or semi-colonial regions. Secondly, recent scholarship on gender—a “Holocaust #MeToo” moment—revealing still mostly untold stories about sexual violence and coercion as well as instrumental sexuality, desire, and even love during the Holocaust, opens up questions that can both integrate and differentiate histories of Nazism and the Holocaust in comparative studies and contemporary experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Holocaust Research\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Holocaust Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.1911133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.1911133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分阶段撰写和修改,从“BC”,前covid“特朗普时代”时代到2021年2月不确定的当前过渡时刻,本文考虑了有关大屠杀研究和国家社会主义历史的研究,教学和公众参与方法转变的问题。它认为,正是为了加深和集中理解“特朗普时代”的纳粹遗产,特别是在不同的政治敏感的学生中,我们不能再把大屠杀放在种族灭绝、战争、流离失所和跨时间和地点的极端暴力的比较历史之外。这篇文章提出了两个具体的调查领域,它们似乎特别适合在创伤和抵抗的比较研究中对纳粹主义和大屠杀进行重新思考和重新定位。首先,重点是扩大时间和地理参数,以突出飞行和救援的全球层面,特别是在非西方殖民地或半殖民地地区。其次,最近关于性别的学术研究——“大屠杀#我也是”(Holocaust #MeToo)的时刻——揭示了大屠杀期间性暴力和强迫以及工具性行为、欲望甚至爱情的大部分仍未为人知的故事,提出了一些问题,这些问题可以在比较研究和当代经验中整合和区分纳粹主义和大屠杀的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Holocaust Studies in Our Age of Catastrophe
ABSTRACT Written and revised in stages, from the “BC,” pre-COVID “Age of Trump” era to an uncertain current transitional moment in February 2021, the article considers questions about shifting approaches to research, teaching, and public engagement in Holocaust Studies and the history of National Socialism. It argues that, precisely in order to deepen and focus understanding of the Nazi legacy in the “Age of Trump,” especially among diverse politically attuned students, we can no longer think the Holocaust outside of a more comparative history of genocide, war, displacement, and extreme violence across time and place. The article suggests two specific arenas of inquiry that seem especially suitable for this ongoing rethinking and repositioning of Nazism and the Holocaust in comparative studies of trauma and resistance. First, a focus on expanding the chronological and geographical parameters to highlight the global dimensions of flight and rescue, especially in non-Western colonial or semi-colonial regions. Secondly, recent scholarship on gender—a “Holocaust #MeToo” moment—revealing still mostly untold stories about sexual violence and coercion as well as instrumental sexuality, desire, and even love during the Holocaust, opens up questions that can both integrate and differentiate histories of Nazism and the Holocaust in comparative studies and contemporary experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Art Met History: Holocaust Exhibitions in Early Postwar Hungary ‘Because They Were Jews!’ The Postwar Artworks of David Friedmann as Eyewitness Testimonies Whose Barbarianism? Exhibiting Antifascism, the Resistance, and the Holocaust in Postwar Italy and Now “Lest We Forget”: Bringing Atrocity Home Through Large Photomurals Artists Behind Barbed Wire: Art Exhibitions in the Detention Camps in Cyprus, 1947–1948
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1