{"title":"先天认知能力:刺激论证的贫乏vs.咖喱论证","authors":"I. Bulov","doi":"10.31079/1992-2868-2020-17-3-99-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the popular argument among nativists, who use it against the empiricist approach. We analyze the strongest objection against the poverty of the stimulus argument which is the curry argument. As a result of the critical consideration of the poverty of the stimulus discussion, we conclude that the curry argument is quite sound.","PeriodicalId":107715,"journal":{"name":"The Humanities And Social Studies In The Far East","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INNATE COGNITIVE CAPACITIES: THE POVERTY OF THE STIMULUS ARGUMENT VS. THE CURRY ARGUMENT\",\"authors\":\"I. Bulov\",\"doi\":\"10.31079/1992-2868-2020-17-3-99-103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is dedicated to the popular argument among nativists, who use it against the empiricist approach. We analyze the strongest objection against the poverty of the stimulus argument which is the curry argument. As a result of the critical consideration of the poverty of the stimulus discussion, we conclude that the curry argument is quite sound.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Humanities And Social Studies In The Far East\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Humanities And Social Studies In The Far East\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31079/1992-2868-2020-17-3-99-103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Humanities And Social Studies In The Far East","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31079/1992-2868-2020-17-3-99-103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
INNATE COGNITIVE CAPACITIES: THE POVERTY OF THE STIMULUS ARGUMENT VS. THE CURRY ARGUMENT
The article is dedicated to the popular argument among nativists, who use it against the empiricist approach. We analyze the strongest objection against the poverty of the stimulus argument which is the curry argument. As a result of the critical consideration of the poverty of the stimulus discussion, we conclude that the curry argument is quite sound.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
