危重病人血液感染的抗生素治疗持续时间:科威特传染病和危重护理专家的全国调查

Buskandar Fahad, Alalayet Abdulrahman, D. Nick, Fowler Robert
{"title":"危重病人血液感染的抗生素治疗持续时间:科威特传染病和危重护理专家的全国调查","authors":"Buskandar Fahad, Alalayet Abdulrahman, D. Nick, Fowler Robert","doi":"10.4103/sccj.sccj_10_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections (BSIs) is an area of controversy and uncertainty. Aims: Our objective was to assess antibiotic treatment duration practices for critically ill patients with BSIs in Kuwait. Subjects and Methods: A survey consisting of clinical scenarios followed by questions about recommended antibiotic treatment duration for each scenario was sent to Kuwaiti infectious diseases, critical care specialists, and anesthetists with critical care experience. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive analysis (medians and interquartile ranges) and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The survey response rate was 68% (112/164). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) ranges for antibiotic duration recommendations were similar for each bacteremic syndrome: central line-associated BSIs, 10 days (7–14); pneumonia, 10 days (7–14); urinary tract infection, 10 days (7–14); intra-abdominal infection, 10 days (7–14); and skin and soft-tissue infection, 10 days (7–14). The median (IQR) antibiotic durations for the following bacteria were as follows: Staphylococcus aureus, 14 days (10–14); extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli, 10 days (7–14); multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 14 days (10–14); MDR Acinetobacter baumannii, 14 days (10–14); vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, 14 days (10–14); carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, 14 days (10–14); and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, 7 days (7–10). For all infectious syndromes and individual organisms, duration responses often followed discrete choices of 5, 7, 10, and 14 days. Prolonging antibiotic therapy for immunocompromised patients was favored among 70% of respondents. Conclusions: This survey demonstrates practice variation in treating BSIs and supports the need for adequately powered randomized controlled trials assessing optimal antibiotic duration for various bacteremic syndromes, pathogens, and resistance patterns.","PeriodicalId":345799,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: A national survey of Kuwaiti infectious diseases and critical care specialists\",\"authors\":\"Buskandar Fahad, Alalayet Abdulrahman, D. Nick, Fowler Robert\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sccj.sccj_10_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections (BSIs) is an area of controversy and uncertainty. Aims: Our objective was to assess antibiotic treatment duration practices for critically ill patients with BSIs in Kuwait. Subjects and Methods: A survey consisting of clinical scenarios followed by questions about recommended antibiotic treatment duration for each scenario was sent to Kuwaiti infectious diseases, critical care specialists, and anesthetists with critical care experience. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive analysis (medians and interquartile ranges) and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The survey response rate was 68% (112/164). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) ranges for antibiotic duration recommendations were similar for each bacteremic syndrome: central line-associated BSIs, 10 days (7–14); pneumonia, 10 days (7–14); urinary tract infection, 10 days (7–14); intra-abdominal infection, 10 days (7–14); and skin and soft-tissue infection, 10 days (7–14). The median (IQR) antibiotic durations for the following bacteria were as follows: Staphylococcus aureus, 14 days (10–14); extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli, 10 days (7–14); multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 14 days (10–14); MDR Acinetobacter baumannii, 14 days (10–14); vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, 14 days (10–14); carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, 14 days (10–14); and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, 7 days (7–10). For all infectious syndromes and individual organisms, duration responses often followed discrete choices of 5, 7, 10, and 14 days. Prolonging antibiotic therapy for immunocompromised patients was favored among 70% of respondents. Conclusions: This survey demonstrates practice variation in treating BSIs and supports the need for adequately powered randomized controlled trials assessing optimal antibiotic duration for various bacteremic syndromes, pathogens, and resistance patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Critical Care Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Critical Care Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sccj.sccj_10_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sccj.sccj_10_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血流感染(bsi)的抗生素治疗持续时间是一个有争议和不确定的领域。目的:我们的目的是评估科威特患有bsi的危重患者的抗生素治疗持续时间。研究对象和方法:一份由临床场景组成的调查,然后是关于每种场景推荐的抗生素治疗时间的问题,该调查被发送给科威特传染病、重症监护专家和具有重症监护经验的麻醉师。统计学分析方法:采用描述性分析(中位数和四分位间距)和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析。结果:调查回复率为68%(112/164)。推荐抗生素使用时间的中位数(四分位间距[IQR])范围对于每种菌血症综合征是相似的:中心线相关性bsi, 10天(7-14天);肺炎,10天(7-14天);尿路感染,10天(7-14);腹腔感染,10天(7-14);皮肤及软组织感染,10天(7 ~ 14天)。以下细菌的抗生素使用时间中位数(IQR)如下:金黄色葡萄球菌,14天(10-14天);广谱β -内酰胺酶大肠杆菌,10天(7-14);耐多药铜绿假单胞菌,14天(10-14);耐多药鲍曼不动杆菌,14天(10-14);耐万古霉素粪肠球菌,14天(10-14);耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌,14天(10-14);凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,7天(7 - 10)。对于所有感染综合征和个体生物体,持续时间反应通常是5、7、10和14天的离散选择。70%的应答者赞成延长免疫功能低下患者的抗生素治疗。结论:该调查显示了治疗bsi的实践差异,并支持有必要进行足够有力的随机对照试验,评估各种菌血症综合征、病原体和耐药模式的最佳抗生素持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: A national survey of Kuwaiti infectious diseases and critical care specialists
Context: Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections (BSIs) is an area of controversy and uncertainty. Aims: Our objective was to assess antibiotic treatment duration practices for critically ill patients with BSIs in Kuwait. Subjects and Methods: A survey consisting of clinical scenarios followed by questions about recommended antibiotic treatment duration for each scenario was sent to Kuwaiti infectious diseases, critical care specialists, and anesthetists with critical care experience. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive analysis (medians and interquartile ranges) and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The survey response rate was 68% (112/164). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) ranges for antibiotic duration recommendations were similar for each bacteremic syndrome: central line-associated BSIs, 10 days (7–14); pneumonia, 10 days (7–14); urinary tract infection, 10 days (7–14); intra-abdominal infection, 10 days (7–14); and skin and soft-tissue infection, 10 days (7–14). The median (IQR) antibiotic durations for the following bacteria were as follows: Staphylococcus aureus, 14 days (10–14); extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli, 10 days (7–14); multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 14 days (10–14); MDR Acinetobacter baumannii, 14 days (10–14); vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, 14 days (10–14); carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, 14 days (10–14); and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, 7 days (7–10). For all infectious syndromes and individual organisms, duration responses often followed discrete choices of 5, 7, 10, and 14 days. Prolonging antibiotic therapy for immunocompromised patients was favored among 70% of respondents. Conclusions: This survey demonstrates practice variation in treating BSIs and supports the need for adequately powered randomized controlled trials assessing optimal antibiotic duration for various bacteremic syndromes, pathogens, and resistance patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A National Survey of Kuwaiti Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Specialists Characteristics and outcomes of adolescents requiring admission to the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: A national survey of Kuwaiti infectious diseases and critical care specialists Use of critical care ultrasound in Saudi Arabia: Questionnaire analysis Effects of different regimens of sedation on mechanically ventilated patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1