参与面对面和在线代际学习的代际差异

Chih-Chi Liu, Ya-Ling Wang
{"title":"参与面对面和在线代际学习的代际差异","authors":"Chih-Chi Liu, Ya-Ling Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intergenerational learning has become prominent in the context of an aging population. Does online intergenerational learning also produce beneficial results in the present era of advanced information technology? The purpose of this paper was to explore the differences in satisfaction with basic psychological needs among college students and older adults when they participated in face-to-face versus online intergenerational learning. This study recruited 15 college students (M = 24.07, SD = 1.83, ranging from 21 to 27 years old; 23.08% male) and 33 older adults (M = 64.61, SD = 5.01, ranging from 55 to 92 years old; 33.33% male) in Taiwan. According to the results of the study, when participating in face-to-face learning, college students (M = 6.41, SD = 0.64) and older adults (M = 6.53, SD = 0.62) had similar autonomy needs satisfaction. However, when participating in online learning, older adults’ autonomy needs satisfaction (M = 6.54, SD = 0.75) is significantly greater than that of college students (M = 5.96, SD = 1.04). Besides, when participating in face-to-face learning, college students (M = 6.27, SD = 0.99) and older adults (M = 6.64, SD = 0.49) had similar relatedness needs satisfaction. However, when participating in online learning, older adults’ relatedness needs satisfaction (M = 6.71, SD = 0.47) is significantly greater than that of college students (M = 5.93, SD = 1.13). In general, this study reported that college students’ satisfaction with autonomy and relatedness needs is much lower when learning online than when learning face-to-face.","PeriodicalId":332586,"journal":{"name":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generational Differences between Participating in Face-to-Face and Online Intergenerational Learning\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Chi Liu, Ya-Ling Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intergenerational learning has become prominent in the context of an aging population. Does online intergenerational learning also produce beneficial results in the present era of advanced information technology? The purpose of this paper was to explore the differences in satisfaction with basic psychological needs among college students and older adults when they participated in face-to-face versus online intergenerational learning. This study recruited 15 college students (M = 24.07, SD = 1.83, ranging from 21 to 27 years old; 23.08% male) and 33 older adults (M = 64.61, SD = 5.01, ranging from 55 to 92 years old; 33.33% male) in Taiwan. According to the results of the study, when participating in face-to-face learning, college students (M = 6.41, SD = 0.64) and older adults (M = 6.53, SD = 0.62) had similar autonomy needs satisfaction. However, when participating in online learning, older adults’ autonomy needs satisfaction (M = 6.54, SD = 0.75) is significantly greater than that of college students (M = 5.96, SD = 1.04). Besides, when participating in face-to-face learning, college students (M = 6.27, SD = 0.99) and older adults (M = 6.64, SD = 0.49) had similar relatedness needs satisfaction. However, when participating in online learning, older adults’ relatedness needs satisfaction (M = 6.71, SD = 0.47) is significantly greater than that of college students (M = 5.93, SD = 1.13). In general, this study reported that college students’ satisfaction with autonomy and relatedness needs is much lower when learning online than when learning face-to-face.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人口老龄化的背景下,代际学习变得尤为突出。在线代际学习在当今信息技术发达的时代是否也能产生有益的结果?摘要本研究旨在探讨大学生与老年人在参与面对面代际学习与在线代际学习时对基本心理需求的满意度差异。本研究共招募15名大学生(M = 24.07, SD = 1.83),年龄21 ~ 27岁;老年人33例(M = 64.61, SD = 5.01,年龄55 ~ 92岁;33.33%男性)。研究结果显示,在参与面对面学习时,大学生(M = 6.41, SD = 0.64)和老年人(M = 6.53, SD = 0.62)的自主需求满意度相似。而老年人参与网络学习时的自主需求满意度(M = 6.54, SD = 0.75)显著大于大学生(M = 5.96, SD = 1.04)。此外,在参与面对面学习时,大学生(M = 6.27, SD = 0.99)和老年人(M = 6.64, SD = 0.49)的相关性需求满意度相似。然而,老年人在参与网络学习时的关系需求满意度(M = 6.71, SD = 0.47)显著大于大学生(M = 5.93, SD = 1.13)。总体而言,本研究报告大学生在线学习时对自主性和相关性需求的满意度远低于面对面学习时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generational Differences between Participating in Face-to-Face and Online Intergenerational Learning
Intergenerational learning has become prominent in the context of an aging population. Does online intergenerational learning also produce beneficial results in the present era of advanced information technology? The purpose of this paper was to explore the differences in satisfaction with basic psychological needs among college students and older adults when they participated in face-to-face versus online intergenerational learning. This study recruited 15 college students (M = 24.07, SD = 1.83, ranging from 21 to 27 years old; 23.08% male) and 33 older adults (M = 64.61, SD = 5.01, ranging from 55 to 92 years old; 33.33% male) in Taiwan. According to the results of the study, when participating in face-to-face learning, college students (M = 6.41, SD = 0.64) and older adults (M = 6.53, SD = 0.62) had similar autonomy needs satisfaction. However, when participating in online learning, older adults’ autonomy needs satisfaction (M = 6.54, SD = 0.75) is significantly greater than that of college students (M = 5.96, SD = 1.04). Besides, when participating in face-to-face learning, college students (M = 6.27, SD = 0.99) and older adults (M = 6.64, SD = 0.49) had similar relatedness needs satisfaction. However, when participating in online learning, older adults’ relatedness needs satisfaction (M = 6.71, SD = 0.47) is significantly greater than that of college students (M = 5.93, SD = 1.13). In general, this study reported that college students’ satisfaction with autonomy and relatedness needs is much lower when learning online than when learning face-to-face.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Deep Learning to Track Representational Flexibility Development of Children with Autism in a Virtual World Emotional Responses toward the Flipped Classroom Approach across Academic Disciplines Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the (Java) Object-Oriented Programming Courses Human’s Reaction Time Based Score Calculation of Self-practice Dynamic Yoga System for User’s Feedback by OpenPose and Fuzzy Rules Using 360 Virtual Reality Video in History Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1