将游戏习惯与学生在游戏化学习体验中的表现联系起来

Gabriel Barata, S. Gama, J. Jorge, D. Gonçalves
{"title":"将游戏习惯与学生在游戏化学习体验中的表现联系起来","authors":"Gabriel Barata, S. Gama, J. Jorge, D. Gonçalves","doi":"10.1145/2658537.2658692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gamified education is a novel concept, and early trials show its potential to engage students and improve their performance. However, little is known about how different students learn with gamification, and how their gaming habits influence their experience. In this paper we present a study where data regarding student performance and gaming preferences, from a gamified engineering course, was collected and analyzed. We performed cluster analysis to understand what different kinds of students could be observed in our gamified experience, and how their behavior could be correlated to their gaming characteristics. We identified four main student types: the Achievers, the Regular students, the Halfhearted students, and the Underachievers, all representing different strategies towards the course and with different gaming preferences. Here we will thoroughly describe each student type and address how different gaming preferences might have impacted the students' learning experience.","PeriodicalId":126882,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relating gaming habits with student performance in a gamified learning experience\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Barata, S. Gama, J. Jorge, D. Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2658537.2658692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gamified education is a novel concept, and early trials show its potential to engage students and improve their performance. However, little is known about how different students learn with gamification, and how their gaming habits influence their experience. In this paper we present a study where data regarding student performance and gaming preferences, from a gamified engineering course, was collected and analyzed. We performed cluster analysis to understand what different kinds of students could be observed in our gamified experience, and how their behavior could be correlated to their gaming characteristics. We identified four main student types: the Achievers, the Regular students, the Halfhearted students, and the Underachievers, all representing different strategies towards the course and with different gaming preferences. Here we will thoroughly describe each student type and address how different gaming preferences might have impacted the students' learning experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

游戏化教育是一个新颖的概念,早期的试验表明,它有可能吸引学生并提高他们的表现。然而,对于不同的学生如何通过游戏化学习,以及他们的游戏习惯如何影响他们的体验,我们却知之甚少。在本文中,我们提出了一项研究,从游戏化工程课程中收集和分析了有关学生表现和游戏偏好的数据。我们进行了聚类分析,以了解在我们的游戏化体验中可以观察到哪些不同类型的学生,以及他们的行为如何与他们的游戏特征相关联。我们确定了四种主要的学生类型:成功者、普通学生、半心半意的学生和差生,他们都代表着不同的课程策略和不同的游戏偏好。在这里,我们将详细描述每种学生类型,并说明不同的游戏偏好如何影响学生的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relating gaming habits with student performance in a gamified learning experience
Gamified education is a novel concept, and early trials show its potential to engage students and improve their performance. However, little is known about how different students learn with gamification, and how their gaming habits influence their experience. In this paper we present a study where data regarding student performance and gaming preferences, from a gamified engineering course, was collected and analyzed. We performed cluster analysis to understand what different kinds of students could be observed in our gamified experience, and how their behavior could be correlated to their gaming characteristics. We identified four main student types: the Achievers, the Regular students, the Halfhearted students, and the Underachievers, all representing different strategies towards the course and with different gaming preferences. Here we will thoroughly describe each student type and address how different gaming preferences might have impacted the students' learning experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding expectations with multiple controllers in an augmented reality videogame Maze commander: a collaborative asynchronous game using the oculus rift & the sifteo cubes Engines of play: how player motivation changes over time Little Newton: an educational physics game Herbert: a motion-controlled mobile game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1