多点触控设备业务流程建模的实证研究

Hauke Wittern
{"title":"多点触控设备业务流程建模的实证研究","authors":"Hauke Wittern","doi":"10.1109/SWSTE.2012.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During business process modeling sessions it is difficult to prevent misunderstandings due to different expertise of the participants. Computers are supporting single persons at their work in various scenarios for quite a while. However, computers could not support reaching consensus yet and were not well suited for collaborative enterprise modeling. But now multi-touch input enables computer supported co-located collaborative work. Particularly, multi-touch tables seem promising to be beneficial for collaborative modeling sessions as sitting around a table supports discussions which can uncover misunderstandings. In this paper a collaborative business process modeling application is presented and evaluated in an empirical study. The study was carried out in 4 different test environments, including a multi-touch table. Finally, it is argued whether multi-touch tables really keep what they promise and whether they are better suited for business process modeling than other work environments.","PeriodicalId":190562,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering","volume":"878 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Study Evaluating Business Process Modeling on Multi-touch Devices\",\"authors\":\"Hauke Wittern\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SWSTE.2012.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During business process modeling sessions it is difficult to prevent misunderstandings due to different expertise of the participants. Computers are supporting single persons at their work in various scenarios for quite a while. However, computers could not support reaching consensus yet and were not well suited for collaborative enterprise modeling. But now multi-touch input enables computer supported co-located collaborative work. Particularly, multi-touch tables seem promising to be beneficial for collaborative modeling sessions as sitting around a table supports discussions which can uncover misunderstandings. In this paper a collaborative business process modeling application is presented and evaluated in an empirical study. The study was carried out in 4 different test environments, including a multi-touch table. Finally, it is argued whether multi-touch tables really keep what they promise and whether they are better suited for business process modeling than other work environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"878 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SWSTE.2012.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SWSTE.2012.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在业务流程建模会议期间,很难避免由于参与者的专业知识不同而产生的误解。很长一段时间以来,计算机一直在各种情况下支持单身人士的工作。然而,计算机还不能支持达成共识,也不适合协作企业建模。但现在多点触控输入使计算机支持协同工作。特别是,多点触控表似乎有利于协作建模会议,因为围坐在桌子旁支持讨论,可以发现误解。本文提出了一个协作式业务流程建模应用,并对其进行了实证研究。该研究在4种不同的测试环境中进行,包括一个多点触控表。最后,本文讨论了多点触控表是否真的信守承诺,以及它们是否比其他工作环境更适合业务流程建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical Study Evaluating Business Process Modeling on Multi-touch Devices
During business process modeling sessions it is difficult to prevent misunderstandings due to different expertise of the participants. Computers are supporting single persons at their work in various scenarios for quite a while. However, computers could not support reaching consensus yet and were not well suited for collaborative enterprise modeling. But now multi-touch input enables computer supported co-located collaborative work. Particularly, multi-touch tables seem promising to be beneficial for collaborative modeling sessions as sitting around a table supports discussions which can uncover misunderstandings. In this paper a collaborative business process modeling application is presented and evaluated in an empirical study. The study was carried out in 4 different test environments, including a multi-touch table. Finally, it is argued whether multi-touch tables really keep what they promise and whether they are better suited for business process modeling than other work environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining Embedded Software Modelling Decisions Software Modeling from Life-Cycle Perspective Resource-Oriented Middleware Abstractions for Pervasive Computing Empirical Study Evaluating Business Process Modeling on Multi-touch Devices Safety Process Patterns: Demystifying Safety Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1