Android运行时-权限基本原理消息的大规模实证研究

Xueqing Liu, Yue Leng, Wei Yang, Wenyu Wang, ChengXiang Zhai, Tao Xie
{"title":"Android运行时-权限基本原理消息的大规模实证研究","authors":"Xueqing Liu, Yue Leng, Wei Yang, Wenyu Wang, ChengXiang Zhai, Tao Xie","doi":"10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Android 6.0 introduces the runtime-permission system, many apps provide runtime-permission-group rationales for the users to better understand the permissions requested by the apps. To understand the patterns of rationales and to what extent the rationales can improve the users' understanding of the purposes of requesting permission groups, we conduct a large-scale measurement study on five aspects of runtime rationales. We have five main findings: (1) less than 25% apps under study provide rationales; (2) for permission-group purposes that are difficult to understand, the proportions of apps that provide rationales are even lower; (3) the purposes stated in a significant proportion of rationales are incorrect; (4) a large proportion of customized rationales do not provide more information than the default permission-requesting message of Android; (5) apps that provide rationales are more likely to explain the same permission group's purposes in their descriptions than apps that do not provide rationales. We further discuss important implications from these findings","PeriodicalId":444336,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","volume":"262 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Android Runtime-Permission Rationale Messages\",\"authors\":\"Xueqing Liu, Yue Leng, Wei Yang, Wenyu Wang, ChengXiang Zhai, Tao Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After Android 6.0 introduces the runtime-permission system, many apps provide runtime-permission-group rationales for the users to better understand the permissions requested by the apps. To understand the patterns of rationales and to what extent the rationales can improve the users' understanding of the purposes of requesting permission groups, we conduct a large-scale measurement study on five aspects of runtime rationales. We have five main findings: (1) less than 25% apps under study provide rationales; (2) for permission-group purposes that are difficult to understand, the proportions of apps that provide rationales are even lower; (3) the purposes stated in a significant proportion of rationales are incorrect; (4) a large proportion of customized rationales do not provide more information than the default permission-requesting message of Android; (5) apps that provide rationales are more likely to explain the same permission group's purposes in their descriptions than apps that do not provide rationales. We further discuss important implications from these findings\",\"PeriodicalId\":444336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)\",\"volume\":\"262 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

Android 6.0引入运行时-权限系统后,许多应用程序都提供了运行时-权限组的基本原理,以便用户更好地了解应用程序所请求的权限。为了理解基本原理的模式,以及这些基本原理在多大程度上可以提高用户对请求权限组的目的的理解,我们对运行时基本原理的五个方面进行了大规模的度量研究。我们有五个主要发现:(1)少于25%的被研究应用提供了基本原理;(2)对于难以理解的权限组目的,提供基本原理的应用程序比例甚至更低;(三)理由中陈述的目的有很大比例不正确的;(4)很大比例的自定义理由没有提供比Android默认的权限请求消息更多的信息;(5)提供基本原理的应用程序比不提供基本原理的应用程序更有可能在其描述中解释相同权限组的目的。我们进一步讨论这些发现的重要意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Android Runtime-Permission Rationale Messages
After Android 6.0 introduces the runtime-permission system, many apps provide runtime-permission-group rationales for the users to better understand the permissions requested by the apps. To understand the patterns of rationales and to what extent the rationales can improve the users' understanding of the purposes of requesting permission groups, we conduct a large-scale measurement study on five aspects of runtime rationales. We have five main findings: (1) less than 25% apps under study provide rationales; (2) for permission-group purposes that are difficult to understand, the proportions of apps that provide rationales are even lower; (3) the purposes stated in a significant proportion of rationales are incorrect; (4) a large proportion of customized rationales do not provide more information than the default permission-requesting message of Android; (5) apps that provide rationales are more likely to explain the same permission group's purposes in their descriptions than apps that do not provide rationales. We further discuss important implications from these findings
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating Socio-Technical Patches for Information Foraging: A Requirements Traceability Case Study Toward an Efficient User Interface for Block-Based Visual Programming BioWebEngine: A generation environment for bioinformatics research How End Users Express Conditionals in Programming by Demonstration for Mobile Apps Calculation View: multiple-representation editing in spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1