异丙酚MCT-LCT与异丙酚纳米乳全麻镇痛的比较研究

S. Shakya, Preeti Vaidya, B. Paudel
{"title":"异丙酚MCT-LCT与异丙酚纳米乳全麻镇痛的比较研究","authors":"S. Shakya, Preeti Vaidya, B. Paudel","doi":"10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pain during injection of propofol continues to be a major discomfort for patients. Different propofol formulations have been introduced to reduce the incidence of pain. \nAims: To know the incidence, severity of pain at induction and post operative amnesic effect of two different formulations of propofol. \nMethods: This double-blinded comparative study involved randomly selected 100 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with physical status score I or II (American Society of Anesthesiologists). Out of 100 patients, 50 received medium and long chain triglyceride Propofol (Group A) while another 50 received nanoemulsion Propofol (Group B) intravenously. Parameters measured and compared were the gender, age, weight, physical status score, pain on injection and postoperative recall of pain during injection of propofol. \nResults: Both groups were comparable with regards to age, gender, physical status score, mean duration of surgery. The presence of pain during injection with propofol in group A was 76% (38 patients) while 36% (18 patients) in group B which was statistically significant (p =0.0001). Severity of pain was more in group A which was statistically significant in comparison to group B (p=0.0001). The arm withdrawal during the injection of propofol was found more in Group A than Group B, 24% vs 0% (p=0.0002). Recall of pain after 4 hours postoperatively was found in 5 patients of Group A (10%) and 3 patients of Group B (6%) which came out to be statistically insignificant (p=0.715). There was no significant difference between  groups regarding heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate and arterial hemoglobin oxygenation at all assessed times (p > 0.05) intraoperatively. \nConclusion: This study clearly shows the incidence and severity of pain on intravenous administration in nanoemulsion Propofol is significantly less. However, amnestic effect was equally present in both the groups.","PeriodicalId":166882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Pain on Injection of Propofol MCT-LCT with Propofol Nanoemulsion for General Anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"S. Shakya, Preeti Vaidya, B. Paudel\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pain during injection of propofol continues to be a major discomfort for patients. Different propofol formulations have been introduced to reduce the incidence of pain. \\nAims: To know the incidence, severity of pain at induction and post operative amnesic effect of two different formulations of propofol. \\nMethods: This double-blinded comparative study involved randomly selected 100 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with physical status score I or II (American Society of Anesthesiologists). Out of 100 patients, 50 received medium and long chain triglyceride Propofol (Group A) while another 50 received nanoemulsion Propofol (Group B) intravenously. Parameters measured and compared were the gender, age, weight, physical status score, pain on injection and postoperative recall of pain during injection of propofol. \\nResults: Both groups were comparable with regards to age, gender, physical status score, mean duration of surgery. The presence of pain during injection with propofol in group A was 76% (38 patients) while 36% (18 patients) in group B which was statistically significant (p =0.0001). Severity of pain was more in group A which was statistically significant in comparison to group B (p=0.0001). The arm withdrawal during the injection of propofol was found more in Group A than Group B, 24% vs 0% (p=0.0002). Recall of pain after 4 hours postoperatively was found in 5 patients of Group A (10%) and 3 patients of Group B (6%) which came out to be statistically insignificant (p=0.715). There was no significant difference between  groups regarding heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate and arterial hemoglobin oxygenation at all assessed times (p > 0.05) intraoperatively. \\nConclusion: This study clearly shows the incidence and severity of pain on intravenous administration in nanoemulsion Propofol is significantly less. However, amnestic effect was equally present in both the groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:注射异丙酚时的疼痛仍然是患者的主要不适。不同的异丙酚制剂已被引入以减少疼痛的发生率。目的:了解两种不同处方异丙酚诱导时疼痛的发生率、严重程度及术后失忆效果。方法:本双盲比较研究随机选择100例全身麻醉下择期手术患者,身体状态评分为I或II(美国麻醉医师协会)。100例患者中,50例接受中长链甘油三酯异丙酚(A组)治疗,50例接受纳米乳异丙酚(B组)静脉注射。测量和比较的参数包括性别、年龄、体重、身体状况评分、注射时疼痛和术后异丙酚注射时疼痛的回忆。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、身体状况评分、平均手术时间等方面具有可比性。A组患者在注射异丙酚时疼痛发生率为76%(38例),B组为36%(18例),差异有统计学意义(p =0.0001)。A组疼痛程度高于B组,差异有统计学意义(p=0.0001)。注射异丙酚时,A组出现较多的断臂现象,分别为24%和0% (p=0.0002)。A组术后4 h疼痛回忆5例(10%),B组术后3例(6%),差异无统计学意义(p=0.715)。两组患者术中心率、平均动脉压、呼吸频率、动脉血红蛋白氧合在各评估时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:本研究清楚地显示纳米乳异丙酚静脉注射后疼痛发生率和严重程度明显降低。然而,遗忘效应在两组中同样存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study of Pain on Injection of Propofol MCT-LCT with Propofol Nanoemulsion for General Anaesthesia
Introduction: Pain during injection of propofol continues to be a major discomfort for patients. Different propofol formulations have been introduced to reduce the incidence of pain. Aims: To know the incidence, severity of pain at induction and post operative amnesic effect of two different formulations of propofol. Methods: This double-blinded comparative study involved randomly selected 100 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with physical status score I or II (American Society of Anesthesiologists). Out of 100 patients, 50 received medium and long chain triglyceride Propofol (Group A) while another 50 received nanoemulsion Propofol (Group B) intravenously. Parameters measured and compared were the gender, age, weight, physical status score, pain on injection and postoperative recall of pain during injection of propofol. Results: Both groups were comparable with regards to age, gender, physical status score, mean duration of surgery. The presence of pain during injection with propofol in group A was 76% (38 patients) while 36% (18 patients) in group B which was statistically significant (p =0.0001). Severity of pain was more in group A which was statistically significant in comparison to group B (p=0.0001). The arm withdrawal during the injection of propofol was found more in Group A than Group B, 24% vs 0% (p=0.0002). Recall of pain after 4 hours postoperatively was found in 5 patients of Group A (10%) and 3 patients of Group B (6%) which came out to be statistically insignificant (p=0.715). There was no significant difference between  groups regarding heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate and arterial hemoglobin oxygenation at all assessed times (p > 0.05) intraoperatively. Conclusion: This study clearly shows the incidence and severity of pain on intravenous administration in nanoemulsion Propofol is significantly less. However, amnestic effect was equally present in both the groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Relationship of Lipid Profile, BMI and Blood Pressure among Non-diabetic Hypertensive Patients - A Hospital Based Study Comparative Study of Opioid Free versus Opioid Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Radiopathological Correlation in Diagnosis of Adnexal Lesions: A Hospital Based Comparative Study Correlation of Mastoid Pneumatization with Middle Ear Pathology in Unilateral Squamous Type of Chronic Otitis Media Functional Outcome of Isolated Middle to Distal Third Ulnar Shaft Fracture in Adults with Square Nail Fixation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1