紧急医疗小组干预期间的儿科患者

Michał Kucap, K. Biały, K. Nadolny, J. Ładny, Robert Gałązkowski
{"title":"紧急医疗小组干预期间的儿科患者","authors":"Michał Kucap, K. Biały, K. Nadolny, J. Ładny, Robert Gałązkowski","doi":"10.36740/emems202204104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Analysis of Emergency Medical Teams’ responses to patients below 18 years of age in operational region of Kato¬wice Emergency Service between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2017. \nMaterial and methods: Retrospective analysis of medical documentation issued by the dispatcher and by the P and S type EMS teams of Katowice Emergency Service between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2017 (n = 974839). Documents regarding response to patients below 18 years of age were included in research (n = 53643). \nResults: EMS teams’ responses to patients below 18 years of age were selected by patients’ date of birth. These came out to be 5,38% of all responses in the defined time period. P-type EMS teams were dispatched to pediatric patients most frequently. This number decreased in months of summer vacation (July and August). The average number of re¬sponses was calculated for 10 months, January-June and September-December (n = 2322,75) and for July and August (n = 1797). Comparing the average results revealed decrease of responses in summer vacation period by n = 22.63%. \nFurther patients below 18 years of age were divided into 4 age groups. It has been observed that among group I and III there is no statistical significance regarding responses in given daytime interval and given year in the time of research. However among group II and IV significance is high (p = 0.016) for group II and (p = 0.028) for group IV. Distribution between responses by EMS-S teams and EMS-P teams in daytime intervals shows that at night (12:00 am-5:59 am) EMS-S team is most frequently dispatched to patients from first three age groups: group I (69% vs. 31%), group II (64% vs. 36%) and group III (57% vs. 43%). In each age group there is high statistical significance. \nConclusions: Patient below 18 years of age is a problem for Emergency Medical Team because of very few responses, leading to lack of experience in examining such patients and undertaking emergency medical procedures. Research revealed relationship between EMS team responses in given months, daytime intervals, age and gender. Number of responses to patients aged 8-13 and 13-18 decreases during summer vacation months and also decreases at night; there are more responses to male patients.","PeriodicalId":433523,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medical Service","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEDIATRIC PATIENT DURING EMERGENCY MEDICAL TEAM INTERVENTION\",\"authors\":\"Michał Kucap, K. Biały, K. Nadolny, J. Ładny, Robert Gałązkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/emems202204104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Analysis of Emergency Medical Teams’ responses to patients below 18 years of age in operational region of Kato¬wice Emergency Service between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2017. \\nMaterial and methods: Retrospective analysis of medical documentation issued by the dispatcher and by the P and S type EMS teams of Katowice Emergency Service between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2017 (n = 974839). Documents regarding response to patients below 18 years of age were included in research (n = 53643). \\nResults: EMS teams’ responses to patients below 18 years of age were selected by patients’ date of birth. These came out to be 5,38% of all responses in the defined time period. P-type EMS teams were dispatched to pediatric patients most frequently. This number decreased in months of summer vacation (July and August). The average number of re¬sponses was calculated for 10 months, January-June and September-December (n = 2322,75) and for July and August (n = 1797). Comparing the average results revealed decrease of responses in summer vacation period by n = 22.63%. \\nFurther patients below 18 years of age were divided into 4 age groups. It has been observed that among group I and III there is no statistical significance regarding responses in given daytime interval and given year in the time of research. However among group II and IV significance is high (p = 0.016) for group II and (p = 0.028) for group IV. Distribution between responses by EMS-S teams and EMS-P teams in daytime intervals shows that at night (12:00 am-5:59 am) EMS-S team is most frequently dispatched to patients from first three age groups: group I (69% vs. 31%), group II (64% vs. 36%) and group III (57% vs. 43%). In each age group there is high statistical significance. \\nConclusions: Patient below 18 years of age is a problem for Emergency Medical Team because of very few responses, leading to lack of experience in examining such patients and undertaking emergency medical procedures. Research revealed relationship between EMS team responses in given months, daytime intervals, age and gender. Number of responses to patients aged 8-13 and 13-18 decreases during summer vacation months and also decreases at night; there are more responses to male patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202204104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medical Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202204104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析2014年1月1日至2017年12月31日加藤急救服务区急诊医疗队对18岁以下患者的响应情况。材料和方法:回顾性分析2014年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间卡托维兹紧急服务中心调度员以及P和S型EMS团队出具的医疗文件(n = 974839)。有关18岁以下患者反应的文献被纳入研究(n = 53643)。结果:EMS团队对18岁以下患者的反应以患者的出生日期选择。在规定的时间段内,这些问题占所有回答的5.38%。p型急救小组最常被派往儿科患者。在暑假期间(7月和8月),这一数字有所下降。计算10个月、1 - 6月和9 - 12月(n = 2322、75)以及7月和8月(n = 1797)的平均回复数。对比平均结果发现,暑假期间的应答率下降了n = 22.63%。18岁以下患者进一步分为4个年龄组。观察到,在研究时间的给定白天间隔和给定年份中,I组和III组的反应没有统计学意义。然而,在II组和IV组中,II组的显著性很高(p = 0.016), IV组的显著性很高(p = 0.028)。EMS-S小组和EMS-P小组在白天间隔的反应分布表明,在夜间(12:00 am-5:59 am), EMS-S小组最常被派往前三个年龄组的患者:I组(69%对31%),II组(64%对36%)和III组(57%对43%)。各年龄组均有较高的统计学意义。结论:18岁以下的患者是紧急医疗小组的一个问题,因为很少有人回应,导致检查这类患者和采取紧急医疗程序缺乏经验。研究揭示了EMS团队在给定月份、白天间隔、年龄和性别之间的反应关系。8-13岁和13-18岁患者的应答数在暑假期间减少,夜间也减少;对男性患者的反应更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PEDIATRIC PATIENT DURING EMERGENCY MEDICAL TEAM INTERVENTION
Aim: Analysis of Emergency Medical Teams’ responses to patients below 18 years of age in operational region of Kato¬wice Emergency Service between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2017. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of medical documentation issued by the dispatcher and by the P and S type EMS teams of Katowice Emergency Service between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2017 (n = 974839). Documents regarding response to patients below 18 years of age were included in research (n = 53643). Results: EMS teams’ responses to patients below 18 years of age were selected by patients’ date of birth. These came out to be 5,38% of all responses in the defined time period. P-type EMS teams were dispatched to pediatric patients most frequently. This number decreased in months of summer vacation (July and August). The average number of re¬sponses was calculated for 10 months, January-June and September-December (n = 2322,75) and for July and August (n = 1797). Comparing the average results revealed decrease of responses in summer vacation period by n = 22.63%. Further patients below 18 years of age were divided into 4 age groups. It has been observed that among group I and III there is no statistical significance regarding responses in given daytime interval and given year in the time of research. However among group II and IV significance is high (p = 0.016) for group II and (p = 0.028) for group IV. Distribution between responses by EMS-S teams and EMS-P teams in daytime intervals shows that at night (12:00 am-5:59 am) EMS-S team is most frequently dispatched to patients from first three age groups: group I (69% vs. 31%), group II (64% vs. 36%) and group III (57% vs. 43%). In each age group there is high statistical significance. Conclusions: Patient below 18 years of age is a problem for Emergency Medical Team because of very few responses, leading to lack of experience in examining such patients and undertaking emergency medical procedures. Research revealed relationship between EMS team responses in given months, daytime intervals, age and gender. Number of responses to patients aged 8-13 and 13-18 decreases during summer vacation months and also decreases at night; there are more responses to male patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SELF-EVALUATION OF THE COMPLIANCE WITH HAND HYGIENE REGULATIONS BY PARAMEDICS IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAMS White Blood Cells Ratios in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Association with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus METHOD OF ERYTHROCYTE PROTECTION IN URGENT CARDIAC SURGERY POSSIBILITIES OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC BRAIN ISCHEMIA FULMINANT SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS CAUSED BY AEROBIC BACTERIA – A PARAMEDIC’S PERSPECTIVE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1