{"title":"投资收益递减的社会贴现","authors":"Marc H. Vatter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1078502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I estimate the social discount rate allowing returns on investment to differ from returns on wealth. The rate of return on investment is below that on wealth, and both are declining. U.S. data imply pure time preference of 1% and relative risk aversion of 3, which I use to project returns going forward. The analysis suggests a descriptive social discount rate of 7.1%, and a prescriptive rate of 6.1%. Zero pure time preference implies only a modest increase in investment over historical and projected rates.","PeriodicalId":170505,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics eJournal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Discounting with Diminishing Returns on Investment\",\"authors\":\"Marc H. Vatter\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1078502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I estimate the social discount rate allowing returns on investment to differ from returns on wealth. The rate of return on investment is below that on wealth, and both are declining. U.S. data imply pure time preference of 1% and relative risk aversion of 3, which I use to project returns going forward. The analysis suggests a descriptive social discount rate of 7.1%, and a prescriptive rate of 6.1%. Zero pure time preference implies only a modest increase in investment over historical and projected rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1078502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1078502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social Discounting with Diminishing Returns on Investment
I estimate the social discount rate allowing returns on investment to differ from returns on wealth. The rate of return on investment is below that on wealth, and both are declining. U.S. data imply pure time preference of 1% and relative risk aversion of 3, which I use to project returns going forward. The analysis suggests a descriptive social discount rate of 7.1%, and a prescriptive rate of 6.1%. Zero pure time preference implies only a modest increase in investment over historical and projected rates.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
