自主机器人的法律和道德规范的未来

Huan Xu, Joseph E. Borson
{"title":"自主机器人的法律和道德规范的未来","authors":"Huan Xu, Joseph E. Borson","doi":"10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Autonomous robotics” promise significant improvements across a host of different complex systems, which will need to be managed within regulatory frameworks to promote, at a minimum, device safety. Contrary to how they are often portrayed, however, these systems do not necessarily require fundamentally new approaches to engineering or regulatory challenges, i.e., the development of a novel “autonomy framework” applicable to different types of devices. Rather, because autonomous systems generally represent a progressive improvement of existing complex systems, preexisting regulatory scheme offer the best guidance for considering future regulation of autonomous elements. Moreover, the regulatory landscape differs considerably based on the type of device at issue (e.g., consumer electronics vis-à-vis medical devices).’ This talk argues that users and regulators must consider future autonomy regulations within the specific framework those devices currently inhabit, rather than focusing on a novel set of rules divorced from the preexisting context.","PeriodicalId":441318,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Legal and Ethical Regulations for Autonomous Robotics\",\"authors\":\"Huan Xu, Joseph E. Borson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Autonomous robotics” promise significant improvements across a host of different complex systems, which will need to be managed within regulatory frameworks to promote, at a minimum, device safety. Contrary to how they are often portrayed, however, these systems do not necessarily require fundamentally new approaches to engineering or regulatory challenges, i.e., the development of a novel “autonomy framework” applicable to different types of devices. Rather, because autonomous systems generally represent a progressive improvement of existing complex systems, preexisting regulatory scheme offer the best guidance for considering future regulation of autonomous elements. Moreover, the regulatory landscape differs considerably based on the type of device at issue (e.g., consumer electronics vis-à-vis medical devices).’ This talk argues that users and regulators must consider future autonomy regulations within the specific framework those devices currently inhabit, rather than focusing on a novel set of rules divorced from the preexisting context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“自主机器人”有望在许多不同的复杂系统上取得重大进步,这些系统需要在监管框架内进行管理,以至少提高设备的安全性。然而,与人们经常描述的相反,这些系统并不一定需要从根本上解决工程或监管挑战的新方法,即开发适用于不同类型设备的新型“自主框架”。相反,由于自治系统通常代表着对现有复杂系统的逐步改进,预先存在的监管方案为考虑未来对自治元素的监管提供了最佳指导。此外,根据问题设备的类型(例如,消费电子产品与-à-vis医疗设备),监管环境有很大差异。这次演讲认为,用户和监管机构必须在这些设备目前所处的特定框架内考虑未来的自主监管,而不是专注于一套脱离现有环境的新规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Future of Legal and Ethical Regulations for Autonomous Robotics
“Autonomous robotics” promise significant improvements across a host of different complex systems, which will need to be managed within regulatory frameworks to promote, at a minimum, device safety. Contrary to how they are often portrayed, however, these systems do not necessarily require fundamentally new approaches to engineering or regulatory challenges, i.e., the development of a novel “autonomy framework” applicable to different types of devices. Rather, because autonomous systems generally represent a progressive improvement of existing complex systems, preexisting regulatory scheme offer the best guidance for considering future regulation of autonomous elements. Moreover, the regulatory landscape differs considerably based on the type of device at issue (e.g., consumer electronics vis-à-vis medical devices).’ This talk argues that users and regulators must consider future autonomy regulations within the specific framework those devices currently inhabit, rather than focusing on a novel set of rules divorced from the preexisting context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative robots system in a photography service using Kukanchi Ethical and Social Considerations for the Introduction of Human-Centered Technologies at Work Perceived Effects of Cycle Time in Human-Robot-Interaction Challenges and Requirements for Employee Qualification in the Context of Human-Robot-Collaboration Advancing Human-Robot Collaboration through Online Human Inverse Dynamics Estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1