{"title":"修改和重写","authors":"P. Eggert","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474456623.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though relatively short-lived, Lawrence was a prolific writer. Characteristically, he would be writing and revising multiple works, often across genres, at or around the same time. Taking a break from one to write the other became habitual – and understandable given the extended period that, say, a novel might take to bring to completion. Each work became an element in the fertile soil from which the others sprang. To demonstrate the truth and implications of this it is only necessary to take a cross-section of his contemporaneous writings at any one creative moment. Immediately, his oeuvre appears differently. The surprisingly provisional nature of his usually forcefully expressed ideas comes into focus when we privilege textual process; and accepted practices of interpretation, based on the published forms of his writings taken as individual objects, as separate works, become problematic. An unfamiliar Lawrence emerges. Examples are taken from Twilight in Italy, ‘The Blind Man’ and The Boy in the Bush.","PeriodicalId":198046,"journal":{"name":"The Edinburgh Companion to D. H. Lawrence and the Arts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revising and Rewriting\",\"authors\":\"P. Eggert\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474456623.003.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though relatively short-lived, Lawrence was a prolific writer. Characteristically, he would be writing and revising multiple works, often across genres, at or around the same time. Taking a break from one to write the other became habitual – and understandable given the extended period that, say, a novel might take to bring to completion. Each work became an element in the fertile soil from which the others sprang. To demonstrate the truth and implications of this it is only necessary to take a cross-section of his contemporaneous writings at any one creative moment. Immediately, his oeuvre appears differently. The surprisingly provisional nature of his usually forcefully expressed ideas comes into focus when we privilege textual process; and accepted practices of interpretation, based on the published forms of his writings taken as individual objects, as separate works, become problematic. An unfamiliar Lawrence emerges. Examples are taken from Twilight in Italy, ‘The Blind Man’ and The Boy in the Bush.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Edinburgh Companion to D. H. Lawrence and the Arts\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Edinburgh Companion to D. H. Lawrence and the Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474456623.003.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Edinburgh Companion to D. H. Lawrence and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474456623.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然寿命相对较短,但劳伦斯是一位多产的作家。典型的是,他会在同一时间写作和修改多部作品,通常是跨流派的。从一本书中休息一下写另一本书成为了一种习惯——考虑到长篇小说可能要花很长时间才能完成,这是可以理解的。每一项工作都成为肥沃土壤中的一种元素,其他工作从中生长出来。为了证明这一点的真实性和含义,只需要在任何一个创作时刻采取他同时代作品的横截面。很快,他的作品看起来就不一样了。当我们对文本过程给予特权时,他通常强有力表达的思想令人惊讶的临时性质就会得到关注;公认的解读实践,基于他的作品的出版形式,作为单独的对象,作为单独的作品,变得有问题。一个陌生的劳伦斯出现了。例如《意大利的暮光之城》、《盲人》和《丛林里的男孩》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revising and Rewriting
Though relatively short-lived, Lawrence was a prolific writer. Characteristically, he would be writing and revising multiple works, often across genres, at or around the same time. Taking a break from one to write the other became habitual – and understandable given the extended period that, say, a novel might take to bring to completion. Each work became an element in the fertile soil from which the others sprang. To demonstrate the truth and implications of this it is only necessary to take a cross-section of his contemporaneous writings at any one creative moment. Immediately, his oeuvre appears differently. The surprisingly provisional nature of his usually forcefully expressed ideas comes into focus when we privilege textual process; and accepted practices of interpretation, based on the published forms of his writings taken as individual objects, as separate works, become problematic. An unfamiliar Lawrence emerges. Examples are taken from Twilight in Italy, ‘The Blind Man’ and The Boy in the Bush.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clothing and Jewellery Historiography and Life Writing Practitioner Criticism: Painting Drama and the Dramatic Practitioner Criticism: Poetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1