{"title":"Ryu和泛光灯控制器在不同SDN拓扑下的性能比较","authors":"Ravin Chouhan, M. Atulkar, N. K. Nagwani","doi":"10.1109/ICATIECE45860.2019.9063806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ryu and Floodlight controllers are being used in academia and industries for different research and development purposes. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance of these controllers under different topologies namely single, linear, tree, torus and custom. Experiments are performed under a much known emulator, mininet. Four parameters were valuated under this experimental setups namely throughput, jitter, latency and packet loss. Valuation of results clearly shows that Ryu is giving better throughput as compared to Floodlight in all the topologies. In case of latency and jitter Ryu is performing better in all the topologies except Torus. Similar is the case with packet loss.","PeriodicalId":106496,"journal":{"name":"2019 1st International Conference on Advanced Technologies in Intelligent Control, Environment, Computing & Communication Engineering (ICATIECE)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Ryu and Floodlight Controllers in Different SDN Topologies\",\"authors\":\"Ravin Chouhan, M. Atulkar, N. K. Nagwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICATIECE45860.2019.9063806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ryu and Floodlight controllers are being used in academia and industries for different research and development purposes. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance of these controllers under different topologies namely single, linear, tree, torus and custom. Experiments are performed under a much known emulator, mininet. Four parameters were valuated under this experimental setups namely throughput, jitter, latency and packet loss. Valuation of results clearly shows that Ryu is giving better throughput as compared to Floodlight in all the topologies. In case of latency and jitter Ryu is performing better in all the topologies except Torus. Similar is the case with packet loss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 1st International Conference on Advanced Technologies in Intelligent Control, Environment, Computing & Communication Engineering (ICATIECE)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 1st International Conference on Advanced Technologies in Intelligent Control, Environment, Computing & Communication Engineering (ICATIECE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATIECE45860.2019.9063806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 1st International Conference on Advanced Technologies in Intelligent Control, Environment, Computing & Communication Engineering (ICATIECE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATIECE45860.2019.9063806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance Comparison of Ryu and Floodlight Controllers in Different SDN Topologies
Ryu and Floodlight controllers are being used in academia and industries for different research and development purposes. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance of these controllers under different topologies namely single, linear, tree, torus and custom. Experiments are performed under a much known emulator, mininet. Four parameters were valuated under this experimental setups namely throughput, jitter, latency and packet loss. Valuation of results clearly shows that Ryu is giving better throughput as compared to Floodlight in all the topologies. In case of latency and jitter Ryu is performing better in all the topologies except Torus. Similar is the case with packet loss.