开发90秒循环测力仪测试以评估无氧能力

S. Pearman, A. Hackney
{"title":"开发90秒循环测力仪测试以评估无氧能力","authors":"S. Pearman, A. Hackney","doi":"10.1080/15438629609512058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to devise a protocol intended to assess optimal anaerobic glycolytic power (AGP) from a number of maximal power output (PO) responses (mean and peak) to a range of 90‐second performance tests. Subjects (n = 24) completed a 30‐second Wingate (WG) test, and four 90‐second AGP tests on a cycle ergometer. In the 90‐second cycle ergometer test, several different trials were made with an ergometer resistance set at 2%, 6%, 8%, and 10% of a subject's body weight (BW). Physiological measurements (heart rate, blood pressure, blood lactate concentration) and a psychological measurement (rating of perceived exertion) were made before a test, immediately after it, and after 30 minutes of recovery from the exertion. Statistically, both the WG and AGP tests produced a significant change (p ≤ 0.05) in the physiological and psychological measures. These results were variable but did show that the 6% and 8% AGP tests were the most stressful. Polynomial regression analysis was made of all PO r...","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a 90‐second cycle ergometer test to assess anaerobic ability\",\"authors\":\"S. Pearman, A. Hackney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15438629609512058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to devise a protocol intended to assess optimal anaerobic glycolytic power (AGP) from a number of maximal power output (PO) responses (mean and peak) to a range of 90‐second performance tests. Subjects (n = 24) completed a 30‐second Wingate (WG) test, and four 90‐second AGP tests on a cycle ergometer. In the 90‐second cycle ergometer test, several different trials were made with an ergometer resistance set at 2%, 6%, 8%, and 10% of a subject's body weight (BW). Physiological measurements (heart rate, blood pressure, blood lactate concentration) and a psychological measurement (rating of perceived exertion) were made before a test, immediately after it, and after 30 minutes of recovery from the exertion. Statistically, both the WG and AGP tests produced a significant change (p ≤ 0.05) in the physiological and psychological measures. These results were variable but did show that the 6% and 8% AGP tests were the most stressful. Polynomial regression analysis was made of all PO r...\",\"PeriodicalId\":403174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438629609512058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438629609512058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是设计一个方案,旨在评估最佳厌氧糖酵解能力(AGP),从一些最大功率输出(PO)反应(平均和峰值)到一系列90秒性能测试。受试者(n = 24)完成了30秒Wingate (WG)测试和4个90秒AGP测试。在90秒周期的测力仪测试中,进行了几个不同的试验,测力仪的阻力分别为受试者体重(BW)的2%、6%、8%和10%。生理测量(心率、血压、血乳酸浓度)和心理测量(感知运动强度评分)分别在测试前、测试后和运动后30分钟进行。统计学上,WG和AGP试验在生理和心理指标上均产生显著变化(p≤0.05)。这些结果各不相同,但确实表明6%和8% AGP测试的压力最大。对所有PO、r、r值进行多项式回归分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a 90‐second cycle ergometer test to assess anaerobic ability
The purpose of this study was to devise a protocol intended to assess optimal anaerobic glycolytic power (AGP) from a number of maximal power output (PO) responses (mean and peak) to a range of 90‐second performance tests. Subjects (n = 24) completed a 30‐second Wingate (WG) test, and four 90‐second AGP tests on a cycle ergometer. In the 90‐second cycle ergometer test, several different trials were made with an ergometer resistance set at 2%, 6%, 8%, and 10% of a subject's body weight (BW). Physiological measurements (heart rate, blood pressure, blood lactate concentration) and a psychological measurement (rating of perceived exertion) were made before a test, immediately after it, and after 30 minutes of recovery from the exertion. Statistically, both the WG and AGP tests produced a significant change (p ≤ 0.05) in the physiological and psychological measures. These results were variable but did show that the 6% and 8% AGP tests were the most stressful. Polynomial regression analysis was made of all PO r...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power spectrum of heart rate variability in exercising humans: The effect of exercise intensity Effects of drop jump height and technique on ground reaction force with possible implication for injury The Influence of an Aircast Sports Stirrup Ankle Brace on the Ankle Joint Proprioception of Professional Soccer Players A Comparison of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running: Considerations in the Prescription of Exercise Intensity Effects of two entrainment patterns on performance of female novice rowers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1