Ali Öztürk, Nurnehir Baltacı Bozkurt, Tuğba Avan Mutlu
{"title":"某三级医院不同临床标本分离金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的药敏分析","authors":"Ali Öztürk, Nurnehir Baltacı Bozkurt, Tuğba Avan Mutlu","doi":"10.51271/kmj-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Staphylococcus aureus infection rates, which are the cause of infections, have rapidly risen in both hospitals and society, constituting a concern. In this study, it was aimed to examine the antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus strains isolated from patients treated in a tertiary state hospital for four years.\nMethods: A retrospective analysis was performed on S. aureus strains (n=584) identified from clinical samples delivered to the medical microbiology laboratory of Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Training and Research Hospital for bacterial culture between 2016 and 2019. The isolates were identified by standard laboratory procedure. VITEK 2 automated system (bioMerieux, France) was used to identification and antibiotic susceptibilities of evaluate the strains.\nResults: Strains were most commonly isolated from wound swab (n=173) and blood culture (n=107). While the highest resistance rate was observed against Erythromycin (n=232), the least amikacin (n=16) resistant strain was determined. Vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance was not observed.\nConclusion: Multi-drug resistance and MRSA resistance still exist today. The absence of vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance, in addition to the low level of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance, is encouraging. This information about S. aureus's susceptibility may be helpful in determining how to administer antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":369732,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from various clinical specimens in a tertiary hospital\",\"authors\":\"Ali Öztürk, Nurnehir Baltacı Bozkurt, Tuğba Avan Mutlu\",\"doi\":\"10.51271/kmj-0098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: Staphylococcus aureus infection rates, which are the cause of infections, have rapidly risen in both hospitals and society, constituting a concern. In this study, it was aimed to examine the antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus strains isolated from patients treated in a tertiary state hospital for four years.\\nMethods: A retrospective analysis was performed on S. aureus strains (n=584) identified from clinical samples delivered to the medical microbiology laboratory of Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Training and Research Hospital for bacterial culture between 2016 and 2019. The isolates were identified by standard laboratory procedure. VITEK 2 automated system (bioMerieux, France) was used to identification and antibiotic susceptibilities of evaluate the strains.\\nResults: Strains were most commonly isolated from wound swab (n=173) and blood culture (n=107). While the highest resistance rate was observed against Erythromycin (n=232), the least amikacin (n=16) resistant strain was determined. Vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance was not observed.\\nConclusion: Multi-drug resistance and MRSA resistance still exist today. The absence of vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance, in addition to the low level of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance, is encouraging. This information about S. aureus's susceptibility may be helpful in determining how to administer antibiotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kastamonu Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kastamonu Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:金黄色葡萄球菌的感染率是引起感染的原因,在医院和社会中都迅速上升,令人担忧。在这项研究中,目的是检查从三级国立医院治疗四年的患者分离的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的抗生素敏感性。方法:回顾性分析2016 - 2019年送到Niğde Ömer Halisdemir大学培训与研究医院医学微生物实验室进行细菌培养的临床样品中鉴定出的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株(n=584株)。采用标准实验室程序对分离株进行鉴定。采用VITEK 2自动化系统(bioMerieux, France)对菌株进行鉴定和药敏评价。结果:伤口拭子(173例)和血培养(107例)中分离到的细菌最多。对红霉素耐药率最高(n=232),对阿米卡星耐药率最低(n=16)。未见万古霉素和替可普兰耐药。结论:目前仍存在耐多药和MRSA耐药。除了甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的低水平耐药性外,没有万古霉素和替柯planin耐药性,这是令人鼓舞的。这些关于金黄色葡萄球菌敏感性的信息可能有助于决定如何使用抗生素。
Antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from various clinical specimens in a tertiary hospital
Aims: Staphylococcus aureus infection rates, which are the cause of infections, have rapidly risen in both hospitals and society, constituting a concern. In this study, it was aimed to examine the antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus strains isolated from patients treated in a tertiary state hospital for four years.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on S. aureus strains (n=584) identified from clinical samples delivered to the medical microbiology laboratory of Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Training and Research Hospital for bacterial culture between 2016 and 2019. The isolates were identified by standard laboratory procedure. VITEK 2 automated system (bioMerieux, France) was used to identification and antibiotic susceptibilities of evaluate the strains.
Results: Strains were most commonly isolated from wound swab (n=173) and blood culture (n=107). While the highest resistance rate was observed against Erythromycin (n=232), the least amikacin (n=16) resistant strain was determined. Vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance was not observed.
Conclusion: Multi-drug resistance and MRSA resistance still exist today. The absence of vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance, in addition to the low level of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance, is encouraging. This information about S. aureus's susceptibility may be helpful in determining how to administer antibiotics.