{"title":"Eksistensi AAUPB di Indonesia dan Yurisprudensinya Dalam Perkara TUN","authors":"Ikhsan Fatah Yasin","doi":"10.15642/ad.2018.8.02.296-317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the General Principles of Good Governance (AAUPB). It has a long journey from the beginning of its coming in the Netherland to its application in Indonesia today. AAUPB, which previously was only in theoretical realm, it changes into Law No. 30 of 2014 today. The principles contained in the law are legal certainty; expediency; impartiality; accuracy; not to abuse authority; openness; public interest; and good service. In addition to these principles, we can also use other principles as far as they become the basis for the judges' judgments that have permanent legal force. In various cases, the basis of the claim of AAUPB does not stand alone but it is also juxtaposed with violations of statutory regulations. The Supreme Court verdict has become a jurisprudence between Suhaili Saun (shareholder in PT Volex Batamindah) and the Chairman of BKPM, although the plaintiff also argued that violating the AAUPB namely the principle of legal certainty, the defendant also violated article 2 letter b of Law No. 1 of 1967 about Foreign Investment. In the case of the dismissal of Bripda Helga Musa Sitepu by the Head of the North Sumatra Regional Police, the decree has violated article 2 paragraph 2 letter d and article 11 paragraph 1 of KAPOLRI regulation No. 8 of 2006 and was contrary to the principle of the district.","PeriodicalId":441184,"journal":{"name":"Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2018.8.02.296-317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文讨论了善治的一般原则(AAUPB)。它从最初在荷兰提出,到今天在印度尼西亚得到应用,经历了漫长的历程。AAUPB以前只是一个理论领域,今天它变成了2014年第30号法律。法律所包含的原则是法律的确定性;权宜之计;公正;准确;不得滥用职权;开放;公共利益;服务也很好。除了这些原则之外,我们还可以使用其他原则,只要这些原则成为法官判决的基础,并具有永久的法律效力。在各种情况下,AAUPB索赔的依据不是单独的,但它也与违反法定规定并列。最高法院的判决已成为Suhaili Saun (PT Volex Batamindah股东)与BKPM主席之间的判例,尽管原告也辩称违反了AAUPB即法律确定性原则,被告也违反了1967年关于外国投资的第1号法第2条b款。在北苏门答腊地区警察局长解除Bripda Helga Musa Sitepu的案件中,该法令违反了2006年第8号KAPOLRI条例第2条第2款d字母和第11条第1款,并且违反了该地区的原则。
Eksistensi AAUPB di Indonesia dan Yurisprudensinya Dalam Perkara TUN
This article discusses the General Principles of Good Governance (AAUPB). It has a long journey from the beginning of its coming in the Netherland to its application in Indonesia today. AAUPB, which previously was only in theoretical realm, it changes into Law No. 30 of 2014 today. The principles contained in the law are legal certainty; expediency; impartiality; accuracy; not to abuse authority; openness; public interest; and good service. In addition to these principles, we can also use other principles as far as they become the basis for the judges' judgments that have permanent legal force. In various cases, the basis of the claim of AAUPB does not stand alone but it is also juxtaposed with violations of statutory regulations. The Supreme Court verdict has become a jurisprudence between Suhaili Saun (shareholder in PT Volex Batamindah) and the Chairman of BKPM, although the plaintiff also argued that violating the AAUPB namely the principle of legal certainty, the defendant also violated article 2 letter b of Law No. 1 of 1967 about Foreign Investment. In the case of the dismissal of Bripda Helga Musa Sitepu by the Head of the North Sumatra Regional Police, the decree has violated article 2 paragraph 2 letter d and article 11 paragraph 1 of KAPOLRI regulation No. 8 of 2006 and was contrary to the principle of the district.