Wely Dozan
{"title":"TELAAH ASBĀB AL-KHATĀ’ FI AL-TAFSĪR (Sebab-sebab Kesalahan dalam Tafsir)","authors":"Wely Dozan","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v4i1.2549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to explain several reasons for interpretation. The dynamics of interpretation that occurred in the first century of the emergence of Islam occurred in at least three phases: the Prophet Muhammad, the companions, and the tabi'in. The prophet's interpretation of the Qur'anic verses was not carried out thoroughly, thus leaving some empty space for the next generation, namely the companions to understand and interpret verses that were not explained by the prophet. In subsequent periods, interpretation tended to ideology as was done by the Khawarij and al-Zamakhsyari groups in al-Kasysyāf's interpretation. First, the emergence of the interpretation of the Khawarij ideology (the group that left the ranks of 'Ali) stems from the giving of the stigma of being kafir for the perpetrators of grave sins. As a consequence they deny the existence of intercession for perpetrators of grave sins based on the verses of the al-Qur'an. Second, the interpretation of al-Zamakhsyari transparently represents Mu'tazilah in certain cases, especially verses that are theological in nature.","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"el-'Umdah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v4i1.2549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图解释解释的几个原因。伊斯兰教出现后的第一个世纪,对经文的解读至少经历了三个阶段:先知穆罕默德、追随者和塔比因。先知对古兰经经文的解释没有进行彻底,从而给下一代留下了一些空间,即同伴们理解和解释先知没有解释的经文。在随后的时期,解释倾向于意识形态,就像al-Kasysyāf中Khawarij和al-Zamakhsyari团体的解释一样。首先,对Khawarij意识形态(离开阿里行列的组织)的解释的出现源于对犯下严重罪行的肇事者给予卡菲尔的耻辱。因此,他们否认存在根据《古兰经》的经文为犯有严重罪行的人代祷。第二,al-Zamakhsyari的解释在某些情况下透明地代表了Mu'tazilah,特别是那些本质上是神学的经文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TELAAH ASBĀB AL-KHATĀ’ FI AL-TAFSĪR (Sebab-sebab Kesalahan dalam Tafsir)
This paper intends to explain several reasons for interpretation. The dynamics of interpretation that occurred in the first century of the emergence of Islam occurred in at least three phases: the Prophet Muhammad, the companions, and the tabi'in. The prophet's interpretation of the Qur'anic verses was not carried out thoroughly, thus leaving some empty space for the next generation, namely the companions to understand and interpret verses that were not explained by the prophet. In subsequent periods, interpretation tended to ideology as was done by the Khawarij and al-Zamakhsyari groups in al-Kasysyāf's interpretation. First, the emergence of the interpretation of the Khawarij ideology (the group that left the ranks of 'Ali) stems from the giving of the stigma of being kafir for the perpetrators of grave sins. As a consequence they deny the existence of intercession for perpetrators of grave sins based on the verses of the al-Qur'an. Second, the interpretation of al-Zamakhsyari transparently represents Mu'tazilah in certain cases, especially verses that are theological in nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS RELEVANSI TEORI ILMU DAN KEPENTINGAN JURGEN HABERMAS DENGAN KAJIAN AL-QUR’AN TELAAH ASBĀB AL-KHATĀ’ FI AL-TAFSĪR (Sebab-sebab Kesalahan dalam Tafsir) KARAKTERISTIK PENAFSIRAN AL-QUR’AN DALAM TAFSIR AN-NUR DAN AL-AZHAR LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, TRANSGENDER PERSPEKTIF AL-QUR’AN DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA KAJIAN KRITIS ATAS KITAB AL-TAFSIR AL-TAUHIDI KARYA HASAN AL-TURABI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1