A. Alarab, Ratib Abu Shameh, Aseel Hajahja, Mohammed Himoni, Aseel Manasra, Suhaib Al Natsha, Muntaser S. Ahmad
{"title":"物理疗法治疗外上髁炎的临床试验:动员技术与冲击波的比较","authors":"A. Alarab, Ratib Abu Shameh, Aseel Hajahja, Mohammed Himoni, Aseel Manasra, Suhaib Al Natsha, Muntaser S. Ahmad","doi":"10.33425/2639-944x.1293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The current study aimed to examine effect of ESWT vs. MWM in the management of tennis elbow. Methods: The study was conducted in the physiotherapy department at PAU. Sample of the study consisted of 22 patients aged between 20-50 years. Patients were selected in the orthopedic clinic and randomly separated into 2 groups. The ESWT group included (12) patients, whereas the MWM group included (10) patients. The first group underwent 3 sessions/week and the latter underwent 2 sessions/week for 4 weeks. The demographic data were assessed. VAS was used for pain intensity. A hand-held dynamometer was used for wrist strength and Quick DASH was used for a functional disability. Results: Inter-group analysis was done using t-test. Comparing pre-post treatments using VAS disclosed that there were not significant differences between groups, P= 0.25. Pre-post treatment for wrist strength uncovered that there wasn't a significant difference between groups, P= 0.47. Pre-post QUICK DASH scores, P=0.35. Therefore, there wasn't a statistically significant difference between groups with functional disabilities. Conclusion: The study found that ESWT and MWM were effective in all outcome measures.","PeriodicalId":443242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"103 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis with Physiotherapy during a Clinical Trial: Comparison of Mobilization Technique and Shock Wave\",\"authors\":\"A. Alarab, Ratib Abu Shameh, Aseel Hajahja, Mohammed Himoni, Aseel Manasra, Suhaib Al Natsha, Muntaser S. Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-944x.1293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The current study aimed to examine effect of ESWT vs. MWM in the management of tennis elbow. Methods: The study was conducted in the physiotherapy department at PAU. Sample of the study consisted of 22 patients aged between 20-50 years. Patients were selected in the orthopedic clinic and randomly separated into 2 groups. The ESWT group included (12) patients, whereas the MWM group included (10) patients. The first group underwent 3 sessions/week and the latter underwent 2 sessions/week for 4 weeks. The demographic data were assessed. VAS was used for pain intensity. A hand-held dynamometer was used for wrist strength and Quick DASH was used for a functional disability. Results: Inter-group analysis was done using t-test. Comparing pre-post treatments using VAS disclosed that there were not significant differences between groups, P= 0.25. Pre-post treatment for wrist strength uncovered that there wasn't a significant difference between groups, P= 0.47. Pre-post QUICK DASH scores, P=0.35. Therefore, there wasn't a statistically significant difference between groups with functional disabilities. Conclusion: The study found that ESWT and MWM were effective in all outcome measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"volume\":\"103 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-944x.1293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-944x.1293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis with Physiotherapy during a Clinical Trial: Comparison of Mobilization Technique and Shock Wave
Objective: The current study aimed to examine effect of ESWT vs. MWM in the management of tennis elbow. Methods: The study was conducted in the physiotherapy department at PAU. Sample of the study consisted of 22 patients aged between 20-50 years. Patients were selected in the orthopedic clinic and randomly separated into 2 groups. The ESWT group included (12) patients, whereas the MWM group included (10) patients. The first group underwent 3 sessions/week and the latter underwent 2 sessions/week for 4 weeks. The demographic data were assessed. VAS was used for pain intensity. A hand-held dynamometer was used for wrist strength and Quick DASH was used for a functional disability. Results: Inter-group analysis was done using t-test. Comparing pre-post treatments using VAS disclosed that there were not significant differences between groups, P= 0.25. Pre-post treatment for wrist strength uncovered that there wasn't a significant difference between groups, P= 0.47. Pre-post QUICK DASH scores, P=0.35. Therefore, there wasn't a statistically significant difference between groups with functional disabilities. Conclusion: The study found that ESWT and MWM were effective in all outcome measures.