利用结构指标改进聚类评价

Mark Shtern, Vassilios Tzerpos
{"title":"利用结构指标改进聚类评价","authors":"Mark Shtern, Vassilios Tzerpos","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the effectiveness of software clustering algorithms is a challenging research question. Several approaches that compare clustering results to an authoritative decomposition have been presented in the literature. Existing evaluation methods typically compress the evaluation results into a single number. They also often disagree with each other for reasons that are not well understood. In this paper, we introduce a novel set of indicators that evaluate structural discrepancies between software decompositions. They also allow researchers to investigate the differences between existing evaluation approaches in a reduced search space. Several experiments with real software systems showcase the usefulness of the introduced indicators.","PeriodicalId":247441,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining clustering evaluation using structure indicators\",\"authors\":\"Mark Shtern, Vassilios Tzerpos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of the effectiveness of software clustering algorithms is a challenging research question. Several approaches that compare clustering results to an authoritative decomposition have been presented in the literature. Existing evaluation methods typically compress the evaluation results into a single number. They also often disagree with each other for reasons that are not well understood. In this paper, we introduce a novel set of indicators that evaluate structural discrepancies between software decompositions. They also allow researchers to investigate the differences between existing evaluation approaches in a reduced search space. Several experiments with real software systems showcase the usefulness of the introduced indicators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

软件聚类算法的有效性评价是一个具有挑战性的研究问题。文献中提出了几种将聚类结果与权威分解进行比较的方法。现有的评价方法通常将评价结果压缩为单个数字。他们也经常因为一些不太清楚的原因而意见不一致。在本文中,我们引入了一套新的指标来评估软件分解之间的结构差异。它们还允许研究人员在减少的搜索空间中调查现有评估方法之间的差异。在实际软件系统上的几个实验表明了所引入的指标的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refining clustering evaluation using structure indicators
The evaluation of the effectiveness of software clustering algorithms is a challenging research question. Several approaches that compare clustering results to an authoritative decomposition have been presented in the literature. Existing evaluation methods typically compress the evaluation results into a single number. They also often disagree with each other for reasons that are not well understood. In this paper, we introduce a novel set of indicators that evaluate structural discrepancies between software decompositions. They also allow researchers to investigate the differences between existing evaluation approaches in a reduced search space. Several experiments with real software systems showcase the usefulness of the introduced indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive views for analyzing problem reports Recovering design rationale from email repositories Maintenance, or the 3rd dimension of eXtreme model-driven design What's hot and what's not: Windowed developer topic analysis On predicting the time taken to correct bug reports in open source projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1