继承的复杂性:导论

S. Bartsch, Jue Hou
{"title":"继承的复杂性:导论","authors":"S. Bartsch, Jue Hou","doi":"10.1086/721385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he six essays in this special issue focus on China’s use of antiquity, both its own and that of the West. They treat the various interpretations and appropriations of the “classics,” East and West, in China from the end of the Cultural Revolution (1976) to the present day. Of course, they cannot be representative of the topic in any comprehensive way, but all of them engage with appropriations of antiquity that are in some way relevant to China’s present. And in that focus, they represent a still nascent field. Other ways of engaging with antiquity have been more common; recent studies have focused on the reception of classical literature by Chinese literary authors of the twentieth century; comparative ancient philosophy; comparative ancient medicine and other cultural comparisons related to Greco-Roman and Chinese antiquity; and comparative history, whether of ancient empires or of China’s rise to power without an industrial revolution. While these studies show the growing interest in China as a sort of mirror to the West, or as a culture that is “good to think with,” they are largely scholarly and","PeriodicalId":187662,"journal":{"name":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complexities of Inheritance: Introduction\",\"authors\":\"S. Bartsch, Jue Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T he six essays in this special issue focus on China’s use of antiquity, both its own and that of the West. They treat the various interpretations and appropriations of the “classics,” East and West, in China from the end of the Cultural Revolution (1976) to the present day. Of course, they cannot be representative of the topic in any comprehensive way, but all of them engage with appropriations of antiquity that are in some way relevant to China’s present. And in that focus, they represent a still nascent field. Other ways of engaging with antiquity have been more common; recent studies have focused on the reception of classical literature by Chinese literary authors of the twentieth century; comparative ancient philosophy; comparative ancient medicine and other cultural comparisons related to Greco-Roman and Chinese antiquity; and comparative history, whether of ancient empires or of China’s rise to power without an industrial revolution. While these studies show the growing interest in China as a sort of mirror to the West, or as a culture that is “good to think with,” they are largely scholarly and\",\"PeriodicalId\":187662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊的六篇文章聚焦于中国对古代的利用,包括中国自己的和西方的。他们讨论了从文化大革命(1976)结束到现在,中国东方和西方对“经典”的各种解释和挪用。当然,它们不能以任何全面的方式代表这个主题,但它们都与古代的挪用有关,在某种程度上与中国的现状有关。在这方面,它们代表着一个仍处于萌芽阶段的领域。与古代接触的其他方式更为常见;最近的研究集中在20世纪中国文学作家对古典文学的接受;比较古代哲学;比较古代医学和其他与希腊罗马和中国古代有关的文化比较;以及比较历史,无论是古代帝国的历史,还是中国在没有工业革命的情况下崛起的历史。虽然这些研究表明,人们对中国越来越感兴趣,认为它是西方的一面镜子,或者是一种“值得思考”的文化,但它们主要是学术性的和不具建设性的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Complexities of Inheritance: Introduction
T he six essays in this special issue focus on China’s use of antiquity, both its own and that of the West. They treat the various interpretations and appropriations of the “classics,” East and West, in China from the end of the Cultural Revolution (1976) to the present day. Of course, they cannot be representative of the topic in any comprehensive way, but all of them engage with appropriations of antiquity that are in some way relevant to China’s present. And in that focus, they represent a still nascent field. Other ways of engaging with antiquity have been more common; recent studies have focused on the reception of classical literature by Chinese literary authors of the twentieth century; comparative ancient philosophy; comparative ancient medicine and other cultural comparisons related to Greco-Roman and Chinese antiquity; and comparative history, whether of ancient empires or of China’s rise to power without an industrial revolution. While these studies show the growing interest in China as a sort of mirror to the West, or as a culture that is “good to think with,” they are largely scholarly and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcreation and Postcolonial Knowledge Chomsky versus Foucault, and the Problem of Knowledge in Translation When Dragons Show Themselves: Research, Constructing Knowledge, and the Practice of Translation A Critique of Provincial Reason: Situated Cosmopolitanisms and the Infrastructures of Theoretical Translation Translation and the Archive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1