罗马尼亚宪法法院(ccr): 2021年1月至6月判例法的选择

Marieta Safta
{"title":"罗马尼亚宪法法院(ccr): 2021年1月至6月判例法的选择","authors":"Marieta Safta","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violation of human dignity by failing to regulate guarantees to accompany the adjudication of incapacity. A protective measure such as the adjudication of incapacity must be established only as an ultima ratio, since it is of extreme seriousness, involving the loss of civil rights as a whole. Each time, it should be carefully analyzed, including whether other measures have proved ineffective to support the person’s civil capacity. Therefore, the State must not waive its positive obligation and must provide all necessary support to avoid such an extreme measure. (Decision no. 601 of 16 July 2020, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 88 of 27 January 2021)","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF ROMANIA (CCR): SELECTION OF CASE LAW JANUARY-JUNE 2021\",\"authors\":\"Marieta Safta\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Violation of human dignity by failing to regulate guarantees to accompany the adjudication of incapacity. A protective measure such as the adjudication of incapacity must be established only as an ultima ratio, since it is of extreme seriousness, involving the loss of civil rights as a whole. Each time, it should be carefully analyzed, including whether other measures have proved ineffective to support the person’s civil capacity. Therefore, the State must not waive its positive obligation and must provide all necessary support to avoid such an extreme measure. (Decision no. 601 of 16 July 2020, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 88 of 27 January 2021)\",\"PeriodicalId\":421528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

因未规范保障而侵犯人的尊严的行为伴随着无行为能力的裁决。诸如裁定丧失行为能力之类的保护性措施只能作为最后办法来确定,因为它是极其严重的,涉及到整个公民权利的丧失。每一次,都应该仔细分析,包括其他措施是否证明是无效的,以支持该人的民事行为能力。因此,国家绝不能放弃其积极义务,必须提供一切必要的支持,以避免采取这种极端措施。(没有决定。2020年7月16日第601号法令,发表于罗马尼亚官方公报第1部分,第618号。2021年1月27日第88号公告)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF ROMANIA (CCR): SELECTION OF CASE LAW JANUARY-JUNE 2021
Violation of human dignity by failing to regulate guarantees to accompany the adjudication of incapacity. A protective measure such as the adjudication of incapacity must be established only as an ultima ratio, since it is of extreme seriousness, involving the loss of civil rights as a whole. Each time, it should be carefully analyzed, including whether other measures have proved ineffective to support the person’s civil capacity. Therefore, the State must not waive its positive obligation and must provide all necessary support to avoid such an extreme measure. (Decision no. 601 of 16 July 2020, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 88 of 27 January 2021)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1