多重世界的公民:社会立宪主义与民主的二律背反

C. Thornhill
{"title":"多重世界的公民:社会立宪主义与民主的二律背反","authors":"C. Thornhill","doi":"10.1111/jols.12104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that Gunther Teubner's theory of societal constitutionalism can be used to examine the realities of citizenship in contemporary society. Teubner's thought illuminates how the rise of global law has directed classical practices of citizenship – claims to rights and participation in law making – away from centralized political institutions, and located them in distinct functional spheres. On this basis, we see that the integration of the democratic citizen only evolved as society assumed an acentric sectoral design, and we observe that the core processes of national integration only approached completion in a post‐national constellation. However, it is also argued here that the contemporary figure of the citizen appears, not as a figure that contradicts, but as a figure that arises directly from the classical form of national citizenship. This fact may be obscured by Teubner's emphasis on societal constitutionalism as a normative construct that emerges beyond the state.","PeriodicalId":142986,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Citizen of Many Worlds: Societal Constitutionalism and the Antinomies of Democracy\",\"authors\":\"C. Thornhill\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jols.12104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that Gunther Teubner's theory of societal constitutionalism can be used to examine the realities of citizenship in contemporary society. Teubner's thought illuminates how the rise of global law has directed classical practices of citizenship – claims to rights and participation in law making – away from centralized political institutions, and located them in distinct functional spheres. On this basis, we see that the integration of the democratic citizen only evolved as society assumed an acentric sectoral design, and we observe that the core processes of national integration only approached completion in a post‐national constellation. However, it is also argued here that the contemporary figure of the citizen appears, not as a figure that contradicts, but as a figure that arises directly from the classical form of national citizenship. This fact may be obscured by Teubner's emphasis on societal constitutionalism as a normative construct that emerges beyond the state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,冈瑟·图布纳的社会宪政理论可以用来考察当代社会的公民权现实。Teubner的思想阐明了全球法律的兴起如何指导公民的经典实践–权利要求与立法参与–远离中央集权的政治机构,并将它们置于不同的功能领域。在此基础上,我们看到,民主公民的整合只有在社会假设了一个非中心的部门设计时才会发展,我们观察到,国家整合的核心过程只有在后国家星座中才接近完成。然而,这里也有人认为,当代公民的形象,不是作为一个矛盾的形象出现的,而是作为一个直接从国家公民的古典形式中产生的形象。这一事实可能被图布纳强调的社会宪政作为一种超越国家的规范性结构所掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Citizen of Many Worlds: Societal Constitutionalism and the Antinomies of Democracy
This article argues that Gunther Teubner's theory of societal constitutionalism can be used to examine the realities of citizenship in contemporary society. Teubner's thought illuminates how the rise of global law has directed classical practices of citizenship – claims to rights and participation in law making – away from centralized political institutions, and located them in distinct functional spheres. On this basis, we see that the integration of the democratic citizen only evolved as society assumed an acentric sectoral design, and we observe that the core processes of national integration only approached completion in a post‐national constellation. However, it is also argued here that the contemporary figure of the citizen appears, not as a figure that contradicts, but as a figure that arises directly from the classical form of national citizenship. This fact may be obscured by Teubner's emphasis on societal constitutionalism as a normative construct that emerges beyond the state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disability, Reasonable Accommodation and the Employer's Obligations: Nano Nagle School V Daly ‘Reasonable Offers’ as a Defence to Unfair Prejudice Petitions: Prescott v Potamianos The Problematic Development of the Stalking Protection Order Equal Civil Partnerships, Discrimination and the Indulgence of Time: R (on the Application of Steinfeld and Keidan) V Secretary of State for International Development Reason‐Giving in Administrative Law: Where are We and Why Have the Courts Not Embraced the ‘General Common Law Duty to Give Reasons’?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1