野外修修补补:女性终端用户程序员的成功秘诀是什么?

L. Lyon, C. Clayton, Emilv Green
{"title":"野外修修补补:女性终端用户程序员的成功秘诀是什么?","authors":"L. Lyon, C. Clayton, Emilv Green","doi":"10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tinkering has been found to be beneficial to learning, yet women report being disinclined to tinker with software even though their tinkering can be more effective than men's. This paper reports on a real-world study of how female end-user programmers tinker with new and existing code and what makes their tinkering successful. Findings show that tinkering falls into two main categories: testing an educated guess (more successful) or haphazard trial and error (less successful). In addition, learners occasionally do not tinker to test a successful solution but rather wait to ask another for confirmation of their educated guess before proceeding. Conclusions from this work show that tinkering leads to success when participants are thinking critically about what the code is doing and have hypothesized expected results from code changes. These findings suggest that designers of end-user programmer instructional materials would assist learners by giving explicit tools and techniques that foster successful tinkering.","PeriodicalId":444336,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","volume":"61 26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tinkering in the Wild: What Leads to Success for Female End-User Programmers?\",\"authors\":\"L. Lyon, C. Clayton, Emilv Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tinkering has been found to be beneficial to learning, yet women report being disinclined to tinker with software even though their tinkering can be more effective than men's. This paper reports on a real-world study of how female end-user programmers tinker with new and existing code and what makes their tinkering successful. Findings show that tinkering falls into two main categories: testing an educated guess (more successful) or haphazard trial and error (less successful). In addition, learners occasionally do not tinker to test a successful solution but rather wait to ask another for confirmation of their educated guess before proceeding. Conclusions from this work show that tinkering leads to success when participants are thinking critically about what the code is doing and have hypothesized expected results from code changes. These findings suggest that designers of end-user programmer instructional materials would assist learners by giving explicit tools and techniques that foster successful tinkering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)\",\"volume\":\"61 26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

修修补补已被发现对学习有益,然而女性报告称她们不愿意修修软件,尽管她们的修修补补可能比男性更有效。本文报告了一项现实世界的研究,研究女性最终用户程序员如何修补新的和现有的代码,以及是什么使她们的修补成功。研究结果表明,修修补补主要分为两类:测试有根据的猜测(更成功)或随意的尝试和错误(不太成功)。此外,学习者有时不会为了测试一个成功的解决方案而进行修修补补,而是在继续之前等待另一个人来确认他们的猜测。这项工作的结论表明,当参与者批判性地思考代码正在做什么,并对代码更改的预期结果进行假设时,修修补补会导致成功。这些发现表明,最终用户程序员教学材料的设计者应该通过提供明确的工具和技术来帮助学习者成功地进行修补。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tinkering in the Wild: What Leads to Success for Female End-User Programmers?
Tinkering has been found to be beneficial to learning, yet women report being disinclined to tinker with software even though their tinkering can be more effective than men's. This paper reports on a real-world study of how female end-user programmers tinker with new and existing code and what makes their tinkering successful. Findings show that tinkering falls into two main categories: testing an educated guess (more successful) or haphazard trial and error (less successful). In addition, learners occasionally do not tinker to test a successful solution but rather wait to ask another for confirmation of their educated guess before proceeding. Conclusions from this work show that tinkering leads to success when participants are thinking critically about what the code is doing and have hypothesized expected results from code changes. These findings suggest that designers of end-user programmer instructional materials would assist learners by giving explicit tools and techniques that foster successful tinkering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating Socio-Technical Patches for Information Foraging: A Requirements Traceability Case Study Toward an Efficient User Interface for Block-Based Visual Programming BioWebEngine: A generation environment for bioinformatics research How End Users Express Conditionals in Programming by Demonstration for Mobile Apps Calculation View: multiple-representation editing in spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1