{"title":"在不精确的统计推理中承认的各种判断","authors":"I. Kozine, L. Utkin","doi":"10.1080/713926640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intending the present paper as a contribution towards precautionary decision-making, the authors give a brief overview and summary of their experience in the modelling of different judgements admitted within the framework of the theory of coherent imprecise previsions and of possible use in reliability analysis. The paper specifically focuses on direct, comparative, structural and unreliable judgements.","PeriodicalId":212131,"journal":{"name":"Risk Decision and Policy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variety of judgements admitted in imprecise statistical reasoning\",\"authors\":\"I. Kozine, L. Utkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/713926640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intending the present paper as a contribution towards precautionary decision-making, the authors give a brief overview and summary of their experience in the modelling of different judgements admitted within the framework of the theory of coherent imprecise previsions and of possible use in reliability analysis. The paper specifically focuses on direct, comparative, structural and unreliable judgements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Decision and Policy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Decision and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/713926640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Decision and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/713926640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variety of judgements admitted in imprecise statistical reasoning
Intending the present paper as a contribution towards precautionary decision-making, the authors give a brief overview and summary of their experience in the modelling of different judgements admitted within the framework of the theory of coherent imprecise previsions and of possible use in reliability analysis. The paper specifically focuses on direct, comparative, structural and unreliable judgements.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
