自然法与普通法之争

David B. Schorr
{"title":"自然法与普通法之争","authors":"David B. Schorr","doi":"10.35562/cliothemis.1240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article recovers a debate, played out over the course of a century, in courts across the « common law world », over whether nature had normative force in water law. It explores areas of water law, such as the extent of public ownership in rivers and the effects of shifting watercourses on ownership, in which some courts, not without controversy, departed from the established rules of English law in order to make rules more appropriate, as they saw it, to the local environment.","PeriodicalId":311580,"journal":{"name":"La nature comme norme","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature Versus the Common Law\",\"authors\":\"David B. Schorr\",\"doi\":\"10.35562/cliothemis.1240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article recovers a debate, played out over the course of a century, in courts across the « common law world », over whether nature had normative force in water law. It explores areas of water law, such as the extent of public ownership in rivers and the effects of shifting watercourses on ownership, in which some courts, not without controversy, departed from the established rules of English law in order to make rules more appropriate, as they saw it, to the local environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"La nature comme norme\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"La nature comme norme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35562/cliothemis.1240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La nature comme norme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35562/cliothemis.1240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章恢复了一场辩论,这场辩论在“普通法世界”的法庭上进行了一个世纪,争论的焦点是自然是否在水法中具有规范性力量。它探讨了水法的一些领域,比如河流的公共所有权的范围,以及改变水道对所有权的影响,在这些领域,一些法院(并非没有争议)偏离了英国法律的既定规则,以便制定更适合当地环境的规则,正如他们所看到的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nature Versus the Common Law
This article recovers a debate, played out over the course of a century, in courts across the « common law world », over whether nature had normative force in water law. It explores areas of water law, such as the extent of public ownership in rivers and the effects of shifting watercourses on ownership, in which some courts, not without controversy, departed from the established rules of English law in order to make rules more appropriate, as they saw it, to the local environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Commentaire de la Déclaration finale de la Conférence Mondiale des Peuples sur le Changement Climatique et les Droits de la Terre-Mère Loi de nature et droit naturel : deux descendants de la révolution scientifique des xviie et xviiie siècles Nature et « artificialité » du droit Commentaire de La solution scientifique de la question sociale, résumés et fragments de l’organisation du bonheur Commentaire d’ « Un empoisonnement au xxie siècle », dans Fantasmagories : histoires rapides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1