通信服务自由是数字单一市场的“第五自由”——欧盟的限制

Z. Meskic
{"title":"通信服务自由是数字单一市场的“第五自由”——欧盟的限制","authors":"Z. Meskic","doi":"10.25234/ECLIC/9028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The freedom of services by correspondence should be one of the most important market freedoms in the EU legislative politics and the CJEU jurisprudence. The announcement of the establishment of a fifth market freedom on data flow is directly addressed by the freedom of services by correspondence. The growing importance of the freedom of services in general is in line with the rise of the EU service sector as the main contributor to growth and employment in the EU, accounting for about two thirds of both EU employment and value added. In addition, since 2015 the Digital Single Market is one of European Commission’s political priority that aims at providing free access to online services. Online services are in most part services by correspondence, where neither provider nor recipient travels cross border. The truth is that the freedom of services by correspondence is barely ever mentioned explicitly neither by EU legislator nor by the CJEU. The EU legislator has rather chosen a sectoral approach to the Digital Single Market, fragmenting the fifth market freedom to several narrow pieces of legislation. The paper deals with the question why the freedom of services by correspondence has not acquired the same position as the freedom of goods. The analysis will focus on answering this question on the grounds of the theory of convergence of market freedoms and its limits.","PeriodicalId":246552,"journal":{"name":"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FREEDOM OF SERVICES BY CORRESPONDENCE AS THE “FIFTH FREEDOM” FOR THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET – LIMITATIONS BY THE TFEU\",\"authors\":\"Z. Meskic\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/ECLIC/9028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The freedom of services by correspondence should be one of the most important market freedoms in the EU legislative politics and the CJEU jurisprudence. The announcement of the establishment of a fifth market freedom on data flow is directly addressed by the freedom of services by correspondence. The growing importance of the freedom of services in general is in line with the rise of the EU service sector as the main contributor to growth and employment in the EU, accounting for about two thirds of both EU employment and value added. In addition, since 2015 the Digital Single Market is one of European Commission’s political priority that aims at providing free access to online services. Online services are in most part services by correspondence, where neither provider nor recipient travels cross border. The truth is that the freedom of services by correspondence is barely ever mentioned explicitly neither by EU legislator nor by the CJEU. The EU legislator has rather chosen a sectoral approach to the Digital Single Market, fragmenting the fifth market freedom to several narrow pieces of legislation. The paper deals with the question why the freedom of services by correspondence has not acquired the same position as the freedom of goods. The analysis will focus on answering this question on the grounds of the theory of convergence of market freedoms and its limits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/ECLIC/9028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/ECLIC/9028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通信服务自由应成为欧盟立法政治和欧盟法理中最重要的市场自由之一。宣布建立第五项数据流动市场自由,直接涉及通信服务自由。总体而言,服务业自由的重要性日益增加,与欧盟服务业作为欧盟增长和就业的主要贡献者的崛起是一致的,服务业约占欧盟就业和增加值的三分之二。此外,自2015年以来,数字单一市场是欧盟委员会的政治优先事项之一,旨在提供免费的在线服务。在线服务在很大程度上是通过通信提供的服务,提供者和接受者都不会跨越国界。事实是,无论是欧盟立法者还是欧洲法院,都几乎从未明确提及通信服务的自由。欧盟立法者选择了一种针对数字单一市场的部门方法,将第五市场自由分割为几条狭窄的立法。本文探讨了通信服务自由为何没有获得与货物自由同等地位的问题。分析将集中在市场自由趋同及其限制理论的基础上回答这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FREEDOM OF SERVICES BY CORRESPONDENCE AS THE “FIFTH FREEDOM” FOR THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET – LIMITATIONS BY THE TFEU
The freedom of services by correspondence should be one of the most important market freedoms in the EU legislative politics and the CJEU jurisprudence. The announcement of the establishment of a fifth market freedom on data flow is directly addressed by the freedom of services by correspondence. The growing importance of the freedom of services in general is in line with the rise of the EU service sector as the main contributor to growth and employment in the EU, accounting for about two thirds of both EU employment and value added. In addition, since 2015 the Digital Single Market is one of European Commission’s political priority that aims at providing free access to online services. Online services are in most part services by correspondence, where neither provider nor recipient travels cross border. The truth is that the freedom of services by correspondence is barely ever mentioned explicitly neither by EU legislator nor by the CJEU. The EU legislator has rather chosen a sectoral approach to the Digital Single Market, fragmenting the fifth market freedom to several narrow pieces of legislation. The paper deals with the question why the freedom of services by correspondence has not acquired the same position as the freedom of goods. The analysis will focus on answering this question on the grounds of the theory of convergence of market freedoms and its limits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTIGATION ORDER THE RIGHT TO WATER AND THE RIGHT TO USE HYDROPOWER: THE CASE OF SERBIA AND LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE EU JUDICIAL CONTROL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS AND MEASURES REGARDING UNLAWFUL RESIDENCE OF FOREIGNERS IN CROATIA IN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT FREEDOM OF SERVICES BY CORRESPONDENCE AS THE “FIFTH FREEDOM” FOR THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET – LIMITATIONS BY THE TFEU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL EDUCATION AND ITS RELEVANCE IN A EUROPEAN CONTEXT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1