韦伯对加尔文预定论的“使用和滥用”

C. Adair‐Toteff
{"title":"韦伯对加尔文预定论的“使用和滥用”","authors":"C. Adair‐Toteff","doi":"10.1080/20566093.2018.1525900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Max Weber demonstrates his mastery in many different fields. However, Weber acknowledged that he was no expert in theology and he admitted that he had relied on a number of theological sources for his treatment of Calvin. Unfortunately, an examination of his sources reveals that Weber was highly selective. He not only chose what he wanted to use; he also dismissed those theologians whose ideas did not seem to fit his interpretation. Weber did not provide us with an account of Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination as it was, but he gave us one as he wanted it to be.","PeriodicalId":252085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weber’s ‘use and abuse’ of Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination\",\"authors\":\"C. Adair‐Toteff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20566093.2018.1525900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Max Weber demonstrates his mastery in many different fields. However, Weber acknowledged that he was no expert in theology and he admitted that he had relied on a number of theological sources for his treatment of Calvin. Unfortunately, an examination of his sources reveals that Weber was highly selective. He not only chose what he wanted to use; he also dismissed those theologians whose ideas did not seem to fit his interpretation. Weber did not provide us with an account of Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination as it was, but he gave us one as he wanted it to be.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Religious and Political Practice\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Religious and Political Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2018.1525900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2018.1525900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在《新教伦理与资本主义精神》一书中,马克斯·韦伯展示了他在许多不同领域的精通。然而,韦伯承认他不是神学方面的专家,他承认他对加尔文的看法依赖于一些神学资料。不幸的是,对他的资料的研究表明,韦伯是高度选择性的。他不仅选择了他想要使用的东西;他也摒弃了那些观点似乎不符合他的解释的神学家。韦伯并没有给我们提供加尔文预定论的原初解释,但他给了我们一个他想要的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weber’s ‘use and abuse’ of Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination
ABSTRACT In the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Max Weber demonstrates his mastery in many different fields. However, Weber acknowledged that he was no expert in theology and he admitted that he had relied on a number of theological sources for his treatment of Calvin. Unfortunately, an examination of his sources reveals that Weber was highly selective. He not only chose what he wanted to use; he also dismissed those theologians whose ideas did not seem to fit his interpretation. Weber did not provide us with an account of Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination as it was, but he gave us one as he wanted it to be.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
State use of public order and social cohesion concerns in the securitisation of non-mainstream Muslims in Malaysia Which Islam? Whose Shariah? Islamisation and citizen recognition in contemporary Indonesia Quest for justice: Islamism, social justice, and civility in Islamic history Speaking Islamic: self-actualisation and justice in Malaysia and India Islamisation in the Indonesian media spaces new sites for a conservative push
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1