正态序列模型中稀疏信号的快速精确贝叶斯推断。

T. Erven, Botond Szabó
{"title":"正态序列模型中稀疏信号的快速精确贝叶斯推断。","authors":"T. Erven, Botond Szabó","doi":"10.1214/20-ba1227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider exact algorithms for Bayesian inference with model selection priors (including spike-and-slab priors) in the sparse normal sequence model. Because the best existing exact algorithm becomes numerically unstable for sample sizes over n=500, there has been much attention for alternative approaches like approximate algorithms (Gibbs sampling, variational Bayes, etc.), shrinkage priors (e.g. the Horseshoe prior and the Spike-and-Slab LASSO) or empirical Bayesian methods. However, by introducing algorithmic ideas from online sequential prediction, we show that exact calculations are feasible for much larger sample sizes: for general model selection priors we reach n=25000, and for certain spike-and-slab priors we can easily reach n=100000. We further prove a de Finetti-like result for finite sample sizes that characterizes exactly which model selection priors can be expressed as spike-and-slab priors. Finally, the computational speed and numerical accuracy of the proposed methods are demonstrated in experiments on simulated data and on a prostate cancer data set. In our experimental evaluation we compute guaranteed bounds on the numerical accuracy of all new algorithms, which shows that the proposed methods are numerically reliable whereas an alternative based on long division is not.","PeriodicalId":186390,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Methodology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast Exact Bayesian Inference for Sparse Signals in the Normal Sequence Model.\",\"authors\":\"T. Erven, Botond Szabó\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/20-ba1227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider exact algorithms for Bayesian inference with model selection priors (including spike-and-slab priors) in the sparse normal sequence model. Because the best existing exact algorithm becomes numerically unstable for sample sizes over n=500, there has been much attention for alternative approaches like approximate algorithms (Gibbs sampling, variational Bayes, etc.), shrinkage priors (e.g. the Horseshoe prior and the Spike-and-Slab LASSO) or empirical Bayesian methods. However, by introducing algorithmic ideas from online sequential prediction, we show that exact calculations are feasible for much larger sample sizes: for general model selection priors we reach n=25000, and for certain spike-and-slab priors we can easily reach n=100000. We further prove a de Finetti-like result for finite sample sizes that characterizes exactly which model selection priors can be expressed as spike-and-slab priors. Finally, the computational speed and numerical accuracy of the proposed methods are demonstrated in experiments on simulated data and on a prostate cancer data set. In our experimental evaluation we compute guaranteed bounds on the numerical accuracy of all new algorithms, which shows that the proposed methods are numerically reliable whereas an alternative based on long division is not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Methodology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-ba1227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-ba1227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们考虑了稀疏正态序列模型中具有模型选择先验(包括尖峰-板先验)的贝叶斯推理的精确算法。由于现有的最佳精确算法对于超过n=500的样本量在数值上变得不稳定,因此有很多人关注替代方法,如近似算法(吉布斯抽样,变分贝叶斯等),收缩先验(例如马蹄先验和钉板LASSO)或经验贝叶斯方法。然而,通过引入在线序列预测的算法思想,我们表明精确的计算对于更大的样本量是可行的:对于一般的模型选择先验,我们达到n=25000,对于某些spike-and-slab先验,我们可以轻松达到n=100000。对于有限样本量,我们进一步证明了一个类似于de finetti的结果,该结果准确地表征了哪些模型选择先验可以表示为尖峰-板先验。最后,在模拟数据和前列腺癌数据集上进行了实验,验证了所提方法的计算速度和数值精度。在我们的实验评估中,我们计算了所有新算法数值精度的保证边界,这表明所提出的方法在数值上是可靠的,而基于长除法的替代方法则不是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fast Exact Bayesian Inference for Sparse Signals in the Normal Sequence Model.
We consider exact algorithms for Bayesian inference with model selection priors (including spike-and-slab priors) in the sparse normal sequence model. Because the best existing exact algorithm becomes numerically unstable for sample sizes over n=500, there has been much attention for alternative approaches like approximate algorithms (Gibbs sampling, variational Bayes, etc.), shrinkage priors (e.g. the Horseshoe prior and the Spike-and-Slab LASSO) or empirical Bayesian methods. However, by introducing algorithmic ideas from online sequential prediction, we show that exact calculations are feasible for much larger sample sizes: for general model selection priors we reach n=25000, and for certain spike-and-slab priors we can easily reach n=100000. We further prove a de Finetti-like result for finite sample sizes that characterizes exactly which model selection priors can be expressed as spike-and-slab priors. Finally, the computational speed and numerical accuracy of the proposed methods are demonstrated in experiments on simulated data and on a prostate cancer data set. In our experimental evaluation we compute guaranteed bounds on the numerical accuracy of all new algorithms, which shows that the proposed methods are numerically reliable whereas an alternative based on long division is not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Empirical Bayes Methods and Applications to Special Types of Data Flexible Bayesian modelling of concomitant covariate effects in mixture models A Critique of Differential Abundance Analysis, and Advocacy for an Alternative Post-Processing of MCMC Conditional variance estimator for sufficient dimension reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1