{"title":"“高僧”的创制:从《明僧传》看《高僧传》的传记性","authors":"Sangyop Lee","doi":"10.1163/15685322-10612p04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the compilation process of Huijiao’s (497-554)\n Gaoseng zhuan by utilizing the manuscript fragments of\n Baochang’s (ca. 466–?) Mingseng zhuan. I first\n question the long-standing assumption that the Mingseng zhuan\n was the “base text” of the Gaoseng zhuan, and\n propose to redefine the relationship between the two monastic biography\n collections more loosely by using the notion of “narrative\n community.” I then suggest that, despite the possible absence of a direct\n textual relation between the two collections, due to the Mingseng\n zhuan being more representative of the Buddhist narrative community\n of early medieval China, the comparison of the two collections is nonetheless\n germane to understanding the compilation process of the Gaoseng\n zhuan. Lastly, by comparing the lists of contents of the two\n collections I identify and analyze distinctive patterns in Huijiao’s\n selection and organization of monastic biographies that helped him perfect the\n idealized abstraction of the “eminent monk.”","PeriodicalId":378098,"journal":{"name":"T’oung Pao","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Invention of the “Eminent Monk”: Understanding the Biographical Craft of the Gaoseng zhuan through the Mingseng zhuan\",\"authors\":\"Sangyop Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685322-10612p04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study investigates the compilation process of Huijiao’s (497-554)\\n Gaoseng zhuan by utilizing the manuscript fragments of\\n Baochang’s (ca. 466–?) Mingseng zhuan. I first\\n question the long-standing assumption that the Mingseng zhuan\\n was the “base text” of the Gaoseng zhuan, and\\n propose to redefine the relationship between the two monastic biography\\n collections more loosely by using the notion of “narrative\\n community.” I then suggest that, despite the possible absence of a direct\\n textual relation between the two collections, due to the Mingseng\\n zhuan being more representative of the Buddhist narrative community\\n of early medieval China, the comparison of the two collections is nonetheless\\n germane to understanding the compilation process of the Gaoseng\\n zhuan. Lastly, by comparing the lists of contents of the two\\n collections I identify and analyze distinctive patterns in Huijiao’s\\n selection and organization of monastic biographies that helped him perfect the\\n idealized abstraction of the “eminent monk.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":378098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"T’oung Pao\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"T’oung Pao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10612p04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"T’oung Pao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10612p04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Invention of the “Eminent Monk”: Understanding the Biographical Craft of the Gaoseng zhuan through the Mingseng zhuan
This study investigates the compilation process of Huijiao’s (497-554)
Gaoseng zhuan by utilizing the manuscript fragments of
Baochang’s (ca. 466–?) Mingseng zhuan. I first
question the long-standing assumption that the Mingseng zhuan
was the “base text” of the Gaoseng zhuan, and
propose to redefine the relationship between the two monastic biography
collections more loosely by using the notion of “narrative
community.” I then suggest that, despite the possible absence of a direct
textual relation between the two collections, due to the Mingseng
zhuan being more representative of the Buddhist narrative community
of early medieval China, the comparison of the two collections is nonetheless
germane to understanding the compilation process of the Gaoseng
zhuan. Lastly, by comparing the lists of contents of the two
collections I identify and analyze distinctive patterns in Huijiao’s
selection and organization of monastic biographies that helped him perfect the
idealized abstraction of the “eminent monk.”