评估联合国经济制裁:1990年至2014年11个制裁目标国家的制裁与进口的关系

G. Bagarella
{"title":"评估联合国经济制裁:1990年至2014年11个制裁目标国家的制裁与进口的关系","authors":"G. Bagarella","doi":"10.18003/AJPA.201605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While scholars have conducted ample studies of sanctions’ policy effectiveness, there has been a limited effort so far in determining their economic and trade costs to target countries. By focusing on sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council on 11 states between the end of the Cold War in 1990 and 2014, this analysis seeks to determine whether UN sanctions are associated with a decrease in target state goods imports and whether there are differential relationships for imports from advanced as opposed to emerging economies. Using a panel data regression methodology and controlling for socioeconomic, political, sanctions-related, financial, and governance factors, this study finds no link between UN sanctions and decreased imports by target states and contrasting evidence for different trade patterns with advanced and emerging economies for other sanction types. These findings, coupled with the costs and externalities sanctions have on both senders and targets, suggest that sanctions yield unclear results in target states and that policymakers should weigh these considerations seriously before using this tool.","PeriodicalId":107878,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing United Nations Economic Sanctions: The Relationship between Sanctions and Imports in Eleven Targeted States from 1990 to 2014\",\"authors\":\"G. Bagarella\",\"doi\":\"10.18003/AJPA.201605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While scholars have conducted ample studies of sanctions’ policy effectiveness, there has been a limited effort so far in determining their economic and trade costs to target countries. By focusing on sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council on 11 states between the end of the Cold War in 1990 and 2014, this analysis seeks to determine whether UN sanctions are associated with a decrease in target state goods imports and whether there are differential relationships for imports from advanced as opposed to emerging economies. Using a panel data regression methodology and controlling for socioeconomic, political, sanctions-related, financial, and governance factors, this study finds no link between UN sanctions and decreased imports by target states and contrasting evidence for different trade patterns with advanced and emerging economies for other sanction types. These findings, coupled with the costs and externalities sanctions have on both senders and targets, suggest that sanctions yield unclear results in target states and that policymakers should weigh these considerations seriously before using this tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18003/AJPA.201605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18003/AJPA.201605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然学者们对制裁的政策有效性进行了大量研究,但迄今为止,在确定制裁对目标国家的经济和贸易成本方面所做的努力有限。通过关注联合国安理会(United Nations Security Council)在1990年至2014年冷战结束期间对11个国家实施的制裁,本分析试图确定联合国制裁是否与目标国家商品进口减少有关,以及从发达经济体和新兴经济体进口是否存在差异关系。本研究采用面板数据回归方法,并控制了社会经济、政治、制裁相关、金融和治理因素,发现联合国制裁与目标国家进口减少之间没有联系,并对比了其他制裁类型与发达经济体和新兴经济体之间不同贸易模式的证据。这些发现,再加上制裁对输出国和目标国造成的成本和外部性,表明制裁在目标国产生的结果不明确,政策制定者在使用这一工具之前应认真权衡这些考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing United Nations Economic Sanctions: The Relationship between Sanctions and Imports in Eleven Targeted States from 1990 to 2014
While scholars have conducted ample studies of sanctions’ policy effectiveness, there has been a limited effort so far in determining their economic and trade costs to target countries. By focusing on sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council on 11 states between the end of the Cold War in 1990 and 2014, this analysis seeks to determine whether UN sanctions are associated with a decrease in target state goods imports and whether there are differential relationships for imports from advanced as opposed to emerging economies. Using a panel data regression methodology and controlling for socioeconomic, political, sanctions-related, financial, and governance factors, this study finds no link between UN sanctions and decreased imports by target states and contrasting evidence for different trade patterns with advanced and emerging economies for other sanction types. These findings, coupled with the costs and externalities sanctions have on both senders and targets, suggest that sanctions yield unclear results in target states and that policymakers should weigh these considerations seriously before using this tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Globalization and Female Economic Participation in MINT and BRICS countries Digital Media Discourse on the Blockage of Huawei by the US Government 2019 World Pensions Forum Held in EU Capital Before G7 Summit Impact of additional equity capital on bank funding costs: Australian evidence Monetary Policy and Financial System Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1