网络讨论的主体效应与外溢效应:观点变化、信息媒介使用与政治活动

Weiyu Zhang, Carol Soon
{"title":"网络讨论的主体效应与外溢效应:观点变化、信息媒介使用与政治活动","authors":"Weiyu Zhang, Carol Soon","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2017.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the main and spillover effects of online deliberation. According to theoretical arguments of deliberative democracy scholars, we defined the main effects as changes in opinions on discussion issues. The spillover effects refer to changes in behaviors that are not directly related to online deliberation activities. In particular, we look at the spillover effects on informational media use and political activities. Relying on two-wave surveys that interviewed 510 citizen participants who used an online deliberation platform for three weeks, we compared the pre-and post-deliberation measures of the outcome variables. Our analyses reveal that most of opinions changed after deliberation but the nature of the changes depends on specific issues. The spillover effects are found to be particularly significant in online media use and social media based political activities. We conclude that both the main and spillover effects are unneglectable outcomes of online deliberation but their patterns are supported by difference mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":240391,"journal":{"name":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Main and Spillover Effects of Online Deliberation: Changes in Opinions, Informational Media Use and Political Activities\",\"authors\":\"Weiyu Zhang, Carol Soon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CeDEM.2017.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the main and spillover effects of online deliberation. According to theoretical arguments of deliberative democracy scholars, we defined the main effects as changes in opinions on discussion issues. The spillover effects refer to changes in behaviors that are not directly related to online deliberation activities. In particular, we look at the spillover effects on informational media use and political activities. Relying on two-wave surveys that interviewed 510 citizen participants who used an online deliberation platform for three weeks, we compared the pre-and post-deliberation measures of the outcome variables. Our analyses reveal that most of opinions changed after deliberation but the nature of the changes depends on specific issues. The spillover effects are found to be particularly significant in online media use and social media based political activities. We conclude that both the main and spillover effects are unneglectable outcomes of online deliberation but their patterns are supported by difference mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究考察了网络讨论的主要效应和溢出效应。根据协商民主学者的理论论述,我们将协商民主的主要影响定义为讨论议题的意见变化。溢出效应是指与网络讨论活动没有直接关系的行为变化。我们特别关注对信息媒体使用和政治活动的溢出效应。我们对510名使用在线审议平台的公民参与者进行了为期三周的两波调查,比较了审议前后对结果变量的衡量标准。我们的分析显示,大多数意见是经过深思熟虑后改变的,但变化的性质取决于具体问题。研究发现,这种溢出效应在网络媒体使用和基于社交媒体的政治活动中尤为显著。研究发现,网络协商的主要效应和溢出效应都是网络协商不可忽视的结果,但其模式受到不同机制的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Main and Spillover Effects of Online Deliberation: Changes in Opinions, Informational Media Use and Political Activities
This study examines the main and spillover effects of online deliberation. According to theoretical arguments of deliberative democracy scholars, we defined the main effects as changes in opinions on discussion issues. The spillover effects refer to changes in behaviors that are not directly related to online deliberation activities. In particular, we look at the spillover effects on informational media use and political activities. Relying on two-wave surveys that interviewed 510 citizen participants who used an online deliberation platform for three weeks, we compared the pre-and post-deliberation measures of the outcome variables. Our analyses reveal that most of opinions changed after deliberation but the nature of the changes depends on specific issues. The spillover effects are found to be particularly significant in online media use and social media based political activities. We conclude that both the main and spillover effects are unneglectable outcomes of online deliberation but their patterns are supported by difference mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empowering Citizens with Open Data by Urban Hackathons Dark Archives and Edemocracy: Strategies for Overcoming Access Barriers to the Public Record Archives of the Future Open Data as Enabler of Public Service Co-creation: Exploring the Drivers and Barriers Smart Cities of Self-Determined Data Subjects Open Data Hopes and Fears: Determining the Barriers of Open Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1